Re: [xml] Entering freeze for release of libxml2-2.9.9

2018-11-25 Thread Stefan Behnel 
Nikolai Weibull schrieb am 24.11.18 um 00:12:
> Yes, it seems that my patch for data in interleaves was added and this may
> be the cause of these issues.  The regression tests didn’t display them, so
> this is something different.  Could we perhaps get a minimal test that breaks?

Here is what I could come up with so far. Since it's heavily stripped down,
it probably isn't very reasonable anymore. The original schema is here:

https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/82601a09d015bc3e7a4090223fcbb9a5d5d4590d/src/lxml/isoschematron/resources/rng/iso-schematron.rng

If any of the "interleave" tags is removed or otherwise modified (as far as
I tried), it either validates (i.e. stops failing) or fails with a
different error than the one I was chasing. The validation succeeds in
xmllint 2.9.4 (and probably later versions), and fails in 2.9.9-rc1.

Does this help?

Stefan


iso-schematron.rng
Description: XML document
http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron";>
Open Model

 BBB element is not present
 CCC element is not present


___
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Re: [xml] Entering freeze for release of libxml2-2.9.9

2018-11-25 Thread Stefan Behnel 
Nikolai Weibull schrieb am 24.11.18 um 00:12:
> Yes, it seems that my patch for data in interleaves was added and this may
> be the cause of these issues.  The regression tests didn’t display them, so
> this is something different.  Could we perhaps get a minimal test that breaks?

It's a bit tricky to cut it down, but I'll try.

In any case, you can already reproduce it with the files I sent, maybe
there's something obvious that goes wrong.

Stefan
___
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml