Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread Mark Wagner
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:50, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
 Greetings all;

 One of the problems that was confusing me recently is that I had replaced
 the old samsung crt monitor with a much newer cheap AOC lcd that runs at
 1360x724 at best, but under the vesa driver on an ati x1650 video card, it
 apparently is running in 1024x768.  This results in a pixel that is far
 from square unless I use a button on the monitor which shrinks the display
 sideways, leaving 2 wide black stripes on the sides.

 From Xorg.0.log:

 (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using hsync range of 30.00-81.00 kHz
 (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using vrefresh range of 55.00-75.00 Hz
 (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using maximum pixel clock of 90.00 MHz
 (II) VESA(0): Not using mode 1360x768 (no mode of this name) ---native

Looks to me like the server is telling you it doesn't know how to
generate a resolution of 1360x768.  If this was a CRT, I'd say to
provide a custom modeline in the xorg.conf file.  Since you've got a
LCD, I don't know if this is the correct solution or not.

-- 
Mark
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread gene heskett
On Monday, August 15, 2011 04:20:49 PM Mark Wagner did opine:

 On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:50, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
  Greetings all;
  
  One of the problems that was confusing me recently is that I had
  replaced the old samsung crt monitor with a much newer cheap AOC lcd
  that runs at 1360x724 at best, but under the vesa driver on an ati
  x1650 video card, it apparently is running in 1024x768. آ This
  results in a pixel that is far from square unless I use a button on
  the monitor which shrinks the display sideways, leaving 2 wide black
  stripes on the sides.
  
  From Xorg.0.log:
  
  (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using hsync range of 30.00-81.00 kHz
  (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using vrefresh range of 55.00-75.00 Hz
  (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using maximum pixel clock of 90.00 MHz
  (II) VESA(0): Not using mode 1360x768 (no mode of this name)
  ---native
 
 Looks to me like the server is telling you it doesn't know how to
 generate a resolution of 1360x768.  If this was a CRT, I'd say to
 provide a custom modeline in the xorg.conf file.  Since you've got a
 LCD, I don't know if this is the correct solution or not.

None of my machines have an xorg.conf with a sample modeline for that.

Could someone post an example I could try please?

Or even better, are there docs someplace that would describe how to do 
that?  I just looked at the modeline description in a man xorg.conf, and 
that lacks the specifics I'd need to make a quasi-intelligent first guess.

Thanks all.

Cheers, gene
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Brogan's Constant:
People tend to congregate in the back of the church and the
front of the bus.
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread Alex Deucher
2011/8/15 gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com:
 On Monday, August 15, 2011 04:20:49 PM Mark Wagner did opine:

 On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:50, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
  Greetings all;
 
  One of the problems that was confusing me recently is that I had
  replaced the old samsung crt monitor with a much newer cheap AOC lcd
  that runs at 1360x724 at best, but under the vesa driver on an ati
  x1650 video card, it apparently is running in 1024x768. آ This
  results in a pixel that is far from square unless I use a button on
  the monitor which shrinks the display sideways, leaving 2 wide black
  stripes on the sides.
 
  From Xorg.0.log:
 
  (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using hsync range of 30.00-81.00 kHz
  (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using vrefresh range of 55.00-75.00 Hz
  (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using maximum pixel clock of 90.00 MHz
  (II) VESA(0): Not using mode 1360x768 (no mode of this name)
  ---native

 Looks to me like the server is telling you it doesn't know how to
 generate a resolution of 1360x768.  If this was a CRT, I'd say to
 provide a custom modeline in the xorg.conf file.  Since you've got a
 LCD, I don't know if this is the correct solution or not.

 None of my machines have an xorg.conf with a sample modeline for that.

 Could someone post an example I could try please?

 Or even better, are there docs someplace that would describe how to do
 that?  I just looked at the modeline description in a man xorg.conf, and
 that lacks the specifics I'd need to make a quasi-intelligent first guess.

The problem with vesa is that you are limited to standard vesa modes
that are implemented in the vbios.  You cannot define arbitrary modes.
 For that you need to use a real driver specific to your video chip.

Alex
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread gene heskett
On Monday, August 15, 2011 06:07:09 PM Alex Deucher did opine:

 2011/8/15 gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com:
  On Monday, August 15, 2011 04:20:49 PM Mark Wagner did opine:
  On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:50, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
   Greetings all;
   
   One of the problems that was confusing me recently is that I had
   replaced the old samsung crt monitor with a much newer cheap AOC
   lcd that runs at 1360x724 at best, but under the vesa driver on an
   ati x1650 video card, it apparently is running in 1024x768. آ This
   results in a pixel that is far from square unless I use a button
   on the monitor which shrinks the display sideways, leaving 2 wide
   black stripes on the sides.
   
   From Xorg.0.log:
   
   (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using hsync range of 30.00-81.00 kHz
   (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using vrefresh range of 55.00-75.00 Hz
   (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using maximum pixel clock of 90.00 MHz
   (II) VESA(0): Not using mode 1360x768 (no mode of this name)
   ---native
  
  Looks to me like the server is telling you it doesn't know how to
  generate a resolution of 1360x768.  If this was a CRT, I'd say to
  provide a custom modeline in the xorg.conf file.  Since you've got a
  LCD, I don't know if this is the correct solution or not.
  
  None of my machines have an xorg.conf with a sample modeline for that.
  
  Could someone post an example I could try please?
  
  Or even better, are there docs someplace that would describe how to do
  that?  I just looked at the modeline description in a man xorg.conf,
  and that lacks the specifics I'd need to make a quasi-intelligent
  first guess.
 
 The problem with vesa is that you are limited to standard vesa modes
 that are implemented in the vbios.  You cannot define arbitrary modes.
  For that you need to use a real driver specific to your video chip.
 
 Alex

I was afraid of that Alex.  And I tried some Modelines suggested on the EMC 
mailing list  got thrown under the bus just as it was leaving.  This 
application that must run, is a realtime application with a base loop of 
its i/o running every 20-40 u-secs.  _NO_ real driver allows that, 
wrecking carving of parts in wholesale numbers because the IRQ's that drive 
this apps base thread can be locked out by the real driver for intervals 
in excess of 100 milliseconds.  The 'vesa' driver is the only driver that 
allows the base thread to keep some semblance of a steady beat.

This particular card is an ATI X1650.  Does it perchance have an available 
vesa bios update that would add some of the 16x9 modes like this?

Cheers, gene
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Guns don't kill people.  It's those damn bullets.  Guns just make them go
really really fast.
-- Jake Johanson
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread Alex Deucher
2011/8/15 gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com:
 On Monday, August 15, 2011 06:07:09 PM Alex Deucher did opine:

 2011/8/15 gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com:
  On Monday, August 15, 2011 04:20:49 PM Mark Wagner did opine:
  On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:50, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
   Greetings all;
  
   One of the problems that was confusing me recently is that I had
   replaced the old samsung crt monitor with a much newer cheap AOC
   lcd that runs at 1360x724 at best, but under the vesa driver on an
   ati x1650 video card, it apparently is running in 1024x768. آ This
   results in a pixel that is far from square unless I use a button
   on the monitor which shrinks the display sideways, leaving 2 wide
   black stripes on the sides.
  
   From Xorg.0.log:
  
   (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using hsync range of 30.00-81.00 kHz
   (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using vrefresh range of 55.00-75.00 Hz
   (II) VESA(0): SAMSUNG: Using maximum pixel clock of 90.00 MHz
   (II) VESA(0): Not using mode 1360x768 (no mode of this name)
   ---native
 
  Looks to me like the server is telling you it doesn't know how to
  generate a resolution of 1360x768.  If this was a CRT, I'd say to
  provide a custom modeline in the xorg.conf file.  Since you've got a
  LCD, I don't know if this is the correct solution or not.
 
  None of my machines have an xorg.conf with a sample modeline for that.
 
  Could someone post an example I could try please?
 
  Or even better, are there docs someplace that would describe how to do
  that?  I just looked at the modeline description in a man xorg.conf,
  and that lacks the specifics I'd need to make a quasi-intelligent
  first guess.

 The problem with vesa is that you are limited to standard vesa modes
 that are implemented in the vbios.  You cannot define arbitrary modes.
  For that you need to use a real driver specific to your video chip.

 Alex

 I was afraid of that Alex.  And I tried some Modelines suggested on the EMC
 mailing list  got thrown under the bus just as it was leaving.  This
 application that must run, is a realtime application with a base loop of
 its i/o running every 20-40 u-secs.  _NO_ real driver allows that,
 wrecking carving of parts in wholesale numbers because the IRQ's that drive
 this apps base thread can be locked out by the real driver for intervals
 in excess of 100 milliseconds.  The 'vesa' driver is the only driver that
 allows the base thread to keep some semblance of a steady beat.

 This particular card is an ATI X1650.  Does it perchance have an available
 vesa bios update that would add some of the 16x9 modes like this?

Not likely.  I don't think vesa ever officially added any 16:9 modes
as standard vesa modes.  Have you tried turning off acceleration?
Add:
Option NoAccel True
in the device section of your xorg.conf.  That should significantly
reduce the number of irqs generated.

Alex
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread Felix Miata

On 2011/08/15 18:16 (GMT-0400) gene heskett composed:


On Monday, August 15, 2011 06:07:09 PM Alex Deucher did opine:



gene heskett wrote:



 One of the problems that was confusing me recently is that I had
 replaced the old samsung crt monitor with a much newer cheap AOC
 lcd that runs at 1360x724 at best, but under the vesa driver on an
 ati x1650 video card, it apparently is running in 1024x768. Â This
 results in a pixel that is far from square unless I use a button
 on the monitor which shrinks the display sideways, leaving 2 wide
 black stripes on the sides.



 The problem with vesa is that you are limited to standard vesa modes
 that are implemented in the vbios.  You cannot define arbitrary modes.
  For that you need to use a real driver specific to your video chip.



I was afraid of that Alex.  And I tried some Modelines suggested on the EMC
mailing list  got thrown under the bus just as it was leaving.  This
application that must run, is a realtime application with a base loop of
its i/o running every 20-40 u-secs.  _NO_ real driver allows that,
wrecking carving of parts in wholesale numbers because the IRQ's that drive
this apps base thread can be locked out by the real driver for intervals
in excess of 100 milliseconds.  The 'vesa' driver is the only driver that
allows the base thread to keep some semblance of a steady beat.



This particular card is an ATI X1650.  Does it perchance have an available
vesa bios update that would add some of the 16x9 modes like this?


If http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions#Modes_defined_by_VESA is 
any guide, I'd be really surprised if anyone anywhere found any video card of 
any age that provides BIOS support for the abortion that are the 136Zx7zz 
modes found only in lower cost widescreen desktop displays. If you were to 
spend a bunch of money on lots of video cards you might find something with 
some amount of 16:9 or 16:10 support, but not likely 136Zx7zz would be any of 
them.


I noted the keyword cheap above in reference to your new display. If cheap 
is what you're after for your VESA environment, I suggest going back to one 
of the readily available CRTs that are so hard for most people to give away, 
or replace that new widescreen with a new 4:3 LCD display.

--
The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread gene heskett
On Monday, August 15, 2011 07:01:27 PM Felix Miata did opine:

 On 2011/08/15 18:16 (GMT-0400) gene heskett composed:
  On Monday, August 15, 2011 06:07:09 PM Alex Deucher did opine:
  gene heskett wrote:
   One of the problems that was confusing me recently is that I
   had replaced the old samsung crt monitor with a much newer
   cheap AOC lcd that runs at 1360x724 at best, but under the
   vesa driver on an ati x1650 video card, it apparently is
   running in 1024x768. آ This results in a pixel that is far
   from square unless I use a button on the monitor which
   shrinks the display sideways, leaving 2 wide black stripes
   on the sides.
   
   The problem with vesa is that you are limited to standard vesa modes
   that are implemented in the vbios.  You cannot define arbitrary
   modes.
   
For that you need to use a real driver specific to your video chip.
  
  I was afraid of that Alex.  And I tried some Modelines suggested on
  the EMC mailing list  got thrown under the bus just as it was
  leaving.  This application that must run, is a realtime application
  with a base loop of its i/o running every 20-40 u-secs.  _NO_ real
  driver allows that, wrecking carving of parts in wholesale numbers
  because the IRQ's that drive this apps base thread can be locked out
  by the real driver for intervals in excess of 100 milliseconds. 
  The 'vesa' driver is the only driver that allows the base thread to
  keep some semblance of a steady beat.
  
  This particular card is an ATI X1650.  Does it perchance have an
  available vesa bios update that would add some of the 16x9 modes like
  this?
 
 If
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions#Modes_defined_by_VESA
 is any guide, I'd be really surprised if anyone anywhere found any
 video card of any age that provides BIOS support for the abortion that
 are the 136Zx7zz modes found only in lower cost widescreen desktop
 displays. If you were to spend a bunch of money on lots of video cards
 you might find something with some amount of 16:9 or 16:10 support, but
 not likely 136Zx7zz would be any of them.
 
 I noted the keyword cheap above in reference to your new display. If
 cheap is what you're after for your VESA environment, I suggest going
 back to one of the readily available CRTs that are so hard for most
 people to give away, or replace that new widescreen with a new 4:3 LCD
 display.

Chuckle, rotsa ruck finding one of those without mail ordering it  putting 
up with a 40 day back order because they have to get one of those from 
China.

As for the crt, that's 4x the power and weight.  and dying like flies 
around here.  That old Samsung that smoked was may last tube monitor  
getting fuzzy when it let all the magic smoke out.

Cheers, gene
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The more I see of men the more I admire dogs.
-- Mme De Sevigne, 1626-1696
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread Felix Miata

On 2011/08/15 19:05 (GMT-0400) gene heskett composed:


Chuckle, rotsa ruck finding one of those without mail ordering it  putting
up with a 40 day back order because they have to get one of those from
China.


compatible
cheap
fast

Pick any two.  :-)

Pittsburg ought to have 1024x768 and/or 1280x1024 in stock somewhere if local 
fails and Amazon, JR Music World, Newegg  places like that don't work for you.



As for the crt, that's 4x the power and weight.  and dying like flies
around here.


Some newer ones just need caps, like motherboards  power supplies from the 
early-mid 00s.



  That old Samsung that smoked was may last tube monitor
getting fuzzy when it let all the magic smoke out.


Gummint auction sites should have piles of them around unless your area has 
dumpstered them all already.

--
The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: Emc vs modern lcd monitors

2011-08-15 Thread gene heskett
On Monday, August 15, 2011 08:01:26 PM Felix Miata did opine:

 On 2011/08/15 19:05 (GMT-0400) gene heskett composed:
  Chuckle, rotsa ruck finding one of those without mail ordering it 
  putting up with a 40 day back order because they have to get one of
  those from China.
 
 compatible
 cheap
 fast
 
 Pick any two.  :-)
 
 Pittsburg ought to have 1024x768 and/or 1280x1024 in stock somewhere if
 local fails and Amazon, JR Music World, Newegg  places like that
 don't work for you.
 
  As for the crt, that's 4x the power and weight.  and dying like flies
  around here.
 
 Some newer ones just need caps, like motherboards  power supplies from
 the early-mid 00s.
 
That old Samsung that smoked was may last tube monitor
  
  getting fuzzy when it let all the magic smoke out.
 
 Gummint auction sites should have piles of them around unless your area
 has dumpstered them all already.

That all took place about 8-10 years ago around here, when dumpster diving 
netted Jim and I 2 pickup loads worth of 17 NEC's in great shape.  Haven't 
seen much since that hasn't been stored out in the weather for a year+.

I'll do some more scouting for a 4x3 model though.

Thanks.

Cheers, gene
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way.
-- Henry Spencer
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com