Re: evdev and Trust TB-5300 tablet: wrong axis labels

2009-12-14 Thread Matthew Helsley
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Peter Hutterer
 wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 01:06:07AM +0200, Daniil V. Kolpakov wrote:
>> В сообщении от 14 декабря 2009 Matthew Helsley написал(a):
>> [...]
>> > Looks like they may have re-branded the "Genius MousePen 5x4 Tablet"
>> > to your "Trust TB-5300".
>> [...]
>> > If you search for "Genius MousePen 5x4 Tablet" or something like it
>> > then perhaps you'll find more ideas for fixing your tablet.
>>
>> Nothing interesting -- mostly I get howtos on installing some (proprietary?)
>> driver called "wizardpen", and usually with xorg.conf instead of HAL rules.
>>
>> I've tried enabling "MULTI_INPUT" quirk, as you've suggested:
>>
>> [r...@shinestar:~]$ modprobe -r usbhid
>> [r...@shinestar:~]$ modprobe usbhid "quirks=0x5543:0x0004:0x0040"
>>
>> It "splitted" the tablet to three devices, as in your case:
>>
>> I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0004 Version=0100
>> N: Name="UC-LOGIC Tablet WP5540U"
>> P: Phys=usb-:03:00.0-2/input0
>> S:
>> Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:06.0/:03:00.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.0/input/input15
>> U: Uniq=
>> H: Handlers=mouse2 event6
>> B: EV=1b
>> B: KEY=c01 1 0 0 0 0
>> B: ABS=103
>> B: MSC=10
>>
>> I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0004 Version=0100
>> N: Name="UC-LOGIC Tablet WP5540U"
>> P: Phys=usb-:03:00.0-2/input0
>> S:
>> Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:06.0/:03:00.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.0/input/input16
>> U: Uniq=
>> H: Handlers=mouse3 event7
>> B: EV=17
>> B: KEY=7 0 0 0 0
>> B: REL=303
>> B: MSC=10
>>
>> I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0004 Version=0100
>> N: Name="UC-LOGIC Tablet WP5540U"
>> P: Phys=usb-:03:00.0-2/input0
>> S:
>> Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:06.0/:03:00.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.0/input/input17
>> U: Uniq=
>> H: Handlers=mouse4 event8
>> B: EV=1b
>> B: KEY=400 7 0 0 0 0
>> B: ABS=103
>> B: MSC=10
>>
>> But xinput only gets two of them. They don't send events (xinput test shows
>> this). But, looking at Xorg.0.log now, I see that the first device is hooked
>> by synaptics driver which cannot init because hardware is unsupported. I know
>> why, I've seen overriding rules in hal config. I'll try to reconfigure it to
>> use evdev driver.
>
> synaptics kicks in after the catchall evdev configuration and overwrites it.
> the reason why it overrides for this device is that anything with absolute
> x/y coordinates and buttons are labelled as touchpads by HAL and the default
> configurations then hook onto this label.
>
> easiest workaround is to drop in your custom configuration into
> /etc/hal/fdi/policies/ and (if you already have another one there) make sure
> that it's loaded last.  HAL uses alphasort when reading the directories.
>
> the match rule needed is something like this:
>
> 

Mine reports "UC-Logic Technology Corp." as the usb.vendor string. My
"input.product" for that device is exactly "Tablet PF1209" (space
included). So the rule would have to check the usb.vendor_id of the
parent "node".

For my tablet I chose to be quite specific:





(I chose the last since evdev is a Linux driver and I didn't know
whether my changes to these .fdi files might eventually be useful on a
*BSD.)

>   evdev
> 

Yes, I've hit this problem and I keep forgetting about it because it's
hidden in the .fdi files, waiting for whenever my distro "upgrades"
them. Sorry, Daniil, I completely forgot to mention this problem :(.


The .fdi file that assigns the synaptic driver to these devices based
solely on the "input.touchpad" capability seems quite wrong to me. My
guess is most tablets that rely on evdev will report absolute
coordinates. If anything, based on their comparably-small physical
size, I'd expect "touchpads" would report relative coordinates. Plus
synaptic can't be the only touchpad vendor/whatnot, can it? Why should
its driver try to claim them all?

Perhaps it should have it's own match key:



(which works for my touchpad at least) rather than:



Sorry, I don't know: Who maintains the .fdi files -- the driver
developer, the distro, or HAL developers? In my distro they're in
/usr/share/hal/policy and the way its packaged suggests the driver
developers are responsible.

Peter am I way off here?


Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: evdev and Trust TB-5300 tablet: wrong axis labels

2009-12-13 Thread Matthew Helsley
2009/12/13 Daniil V. Kolpakov :
> Matthew, thanks for the info!

You're quite welcome!

> В сообщении от 13 декабря 2009 Matthew Helsley написал(a):
>> What does /proc/bus/input/devices say about your tablet? I've got a
>> UC-LOGIC "Genius Pensketch 12x9" which had (and still has) some USB
>> quirks. The worst was it reported the X axis as the Z axis. It turned
>> out that the hid descriptor was bad and thus the kernel hid parser got
>> confused. Specifying the "MULTI" quirk seemed to fix the axis
>> labelling problem. You can test it and other quirks out by writing to
>> a sysfs file -- though I'm looking and can't seem to find it on my
>> 2.6.31 distro kernel :(.
>
> /proc/bus/input/devices says pretty much the same as it does in your case:
>
> I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0004 Version=0100
> N: Name="UC-LOGIC Tablet WP5540U"

Looks like they may have re-branded the "Genius MousePen 5x4 Tablet"
to your "Trust TB-5300". Here's the usb.ids section which suggests
that:

5543  UC-Logic Technology Corp.
0002  SuperPen WP3325U Tablet
0003  Genius MousePen 4x3 Tablet/Aquila L1 Tablet
0004  Genius MousePen 5x4 Tablet
0005  Genius MousePen 8x6 Tablet
0041  Genius PenSketch 6x8 Tablet
0042  Genius PenSketch 12x9 Tablet

If you search for "Genius MousePen 5x4 Tablet" or something like it
then perhaps you'll find more ideas for fixing your tablet. Of course
this could be misleading -- I believe there are examples of vendors
re-using USB vendor:product pairs for different products.

> P: Phys=usb-:03:00.0-2/input0
> S:
> Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:06.0/:03:00.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.0/input/input6
> U: Uniq=
> H: Handlers=mouse2 event6

To decode the following you can use /usr/include/linux/input.h
(assuming you have a libc devel package installed. I've decoded it
below:

> B: EV=1f
> B: KEY=c01 3f0001 0 0 0 0
> B: REL=303

This is: 00110011
which says it reports REL_MISC, REL_WHEEL, REL_Y, and REL_X events.

> B: ABS=10f

This one says it reports ABS_X, ABS_Y, ABS_Z, ABS_RX and ABS_PRESSURE.

So, as you can see, the evdev driver properly decoded what the kernel
told it about the device. It seems like the events produced by the
kernel are wrong because the hid descriptor is probably broken.
Incidentally, you can get a copy of that too.
This isn't what I used -- it looks even more helpful:


http://old.nabble.com/How-to-dump-HID-report-descriptor-under-Linux-td19609562.html

With the example, decoded HID descriptor printed here:

http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-How-to-dump-HID-report-descriptor-under-Linux-p20159409.html

Which suggests (running as root user):

u...@localhost: ~/$ less /proc/bus/input/devices
  ...
  I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0042 Version=0100
^  
  N: Name="Tablet PF1209"
  P: Phys=usb-:00:1d.1-2/input0
  S: Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.1/usb6/6-2/6-2:1.0/input/input10

   ^^^
  ...
r...@localhost: ~/# echo '6-2:1.0' > /sys/bus/usb/drivers/usbhid/unbind
r...@localhost: ~/# lsusb -vvv -d '5543:0042'
Bus 006 Device 002: ID 5543:0042 UC-Logic Technology Corp. Genius
PenSketch 12x9 Tablet
Device Descriptor:
  bLength18
  bDescriptorType 1
  bcdUSB   1.10
  bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level)
  bDeviceSubClass 0
  bDeviceProtocol 0
  bMaxPacketSize0 8
  idVendor   0x5543 UC-Logic Technology Corp.
  idProduct  0x0042 Genius PenSketch 12x9 Tablet
  bcdDevice0.00
  iManufacturer   1
  iProduct2 Tablet PF1209
  iSerial 0
  bNumConfigurations  1
  Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength   34
bNumInterfaces  1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration  0
bmAttributes 0xa0
  (Bus Powered)
  Remote Wakeup
MaxPower  100mA
Interface Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 4
  bInterfaceNumber0
  bAlternateSetting   0
  bNumEndpoints   1
  bInterfaceClass 3 Human Interface Device
  bInterfaceSubClass  1 Boot Interface Subclass
  bInterfaceProtocol  2 Mouse
  iInterface  2 Tablet PF1209
  ** UNRECOGNIZED:  09 21 00 01 00 01 22 ea 00
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81  EP 1 IN
bmAttributes3
  Transfer TypeInterrupt
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSiz

Re: evdev and Trust TB-5300 tablet: wrong axis labels

2009-12-12 Thread Matthew Helsley
2009/12/12 Daniil Kolpakov :
> (Sorry, the email was send from wrong address. Resending it.)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm playing with Trust TB-5300 tablet, which gets identified as "UC-LOGIC
> Tablet WP5540U" by HAL and xorg loads evdev driver for it on plug.
>
> I'm getting the following list of axes with xinput list --long:
> Abs X, Abs Y, Abs Z, Abs Rotary X, Abs Pressure (5 axes). xinput test shows
> output like this:
>
> motion a[0]=0 a[1]=0 a[2]=32045 a[3]=16538 a[4]=55
> motion a[0]=0 a[1]=0 a[2]=32072 a[3]=16575 a[4]=54
> motion a[0]=0 a[1]=0 a[2]=32114 a[3]=16596 a[4]=49
>
> a[0] and a[1] is always 0, a[2] is X, a[3] is Y and a[4] is pressure.

What does /proc/bus/input/devices say about your tablet? I've got a
UC-LOGIC "Genius Pensketch 12x9" which had (and still has) some USB
quirks. The worst was it reported the X axis as the Z axis. It turned
out that the hid descriptor was bad and thus the kernel hid parser got
confused. Specifying the "MULTI" quirk seemed to fix the axis
labelling problem. You can test it and other quirks out by writing to
a sysfs file -- though I'm looking and can't seem to find it on my
2.6.31 distro kernel :(.

(Cc'ing linux-input and linux-usb in case they can offer help with any
potential kernel-level workarounds/fixes/etc)

The rest of this email is my own experience with a UC-LOGIC tablet and
may or may not be useful to you.

Cheers,
-Matt Helsley

For example, here's my tablet's description in /proc/bus/input/devices
before (circa 2.6.24) and after applying the quirk (circa 2.6.31)
respectively:

BEFORE (1 entry):

I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0042 Version=0100
N: Name="Tablet PF1209"
P: Phys=usb-:00:02.0-8/input0
S: Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb1/1-8/1-8:1.0/input/input9
U: Uniq=
H: Handlers=mouse1 event1
B: EV=1f
B: KEY=c01 3f0001 0 0 0 0
B: REL=303
B: ABS=10f
B: MSC=10


AFTER (3 entries):

I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0042 Version=0100
N: Name="Tablet PF1209"
P: Phys=usb-:00:1d.1-2/input0
S: Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.1/usb6/6-2/6-2:1.0/input/input6
U: Uniq=
H: Handlers=mouse2 event6 evbug
B: EV=1b
B: KEY=c01 1 0 0 0 0
B: ABS=103
B: MSC=10

I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0042 Version=0100
N: Name="Tablet PF1209"
P: Phys=usb-:00:1d.1-2/input0
S: Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.1/usb6/6-2/6-2:1.0/input/input7
U: Uniq=
H: Handlers=mouse3 event7 evbug
B: EV=17
B: KEY=7 0 0 0 0
B: REL=303
B: MSC=10

I: Bus=0003 Vendor=5543 Product=0042 Version=0100
N: Name="Tablet PF1209"
P: Phys=usb-:00:1d.1-2/input0
S: Sysfs=/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.1/usb6/6-2/6-2:1.0/input/input8
U: Uniq=
H: Handlers=mouse4 event8 evbug
B: EV=1b
B: KEY=400 7 0 0 0 0
B: ABS=103
B: MSC=10


Note how REL and ABS reports don't appear in the same entry anymore.
In the original entry, if you decode the bits, you can see that it was
claiming to report both relative and absolute axis. Of course this is
not, strictly speaking, an indicator of a bug either. However the fact
is the "puck" reports relative events while the pen reports absolute
events. I could determine this by running a test program on the
/dev/input/eventX device mentioned and seeing what kinds of events
each triggered. Now with the "MULTI" quirk it produces 3 entries.

Some other fun quirks you may look forward too:

Unfortunately, only two of the event devices actually emit events. The
resolutions and ranges of the axii aren't properly reported on every
device. Also the device occaisionally enters a state where all but a
thin border of the active area is disabled. "Fixing" this requires
hooking the tablet up to a windows box with a usb switch and then
"switching" it to the Linux box without powering off. So it seems
there are some magic commands the windows driver knows about which I
couldn't see in the HID descriptor table (would they be there?) which
re-enable/specify the active area. Since getting into the state never
happens with the computer/tablet powered on I can't debug this
problem.
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg


Re: XI2 pull warning

2009-06-04 Thread Matthew Helsley
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:29 AM, John Tapsell  wrote:
> 2009/5/29 Peter Hutterer :
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:54:22PM -0400, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
>>> Thanks for the work you've put into this.  I haven't spent a lot of time
>>>  testing the new code, but here are my first impressions.  You're
>>> probably aware of most of the issues below already, but I'll mention
>>> them just in case.
>
> Has anyone from wine had a look at the patch?  Might it be good to get
> someone from there to sign off on this, since they need the XI2 stuff
> to have fairly specific behaviour?
>
> John

Back in April Wine Weekly News mentioned Paul Hampson is working with XInput2:

http://www.winehq.org/wwn/357#XInput 2 Spec
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-April/074957.html

Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg


Re: Adding support for a (multi-)touchscreen - where best to add it?

2009-03-17 Thread Matthew Helsley
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Peter Hutterer
 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 06:21:04AM -0500, David Hagood wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 11:43 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 01:40:29PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>>
>> > I agree. getting something sensible in the kernel prevents us from 
>> > replicating
>> > the "one X driver per device" hilarity.
>> > Once we have that support in the kernel, we can look at how to get it to
>> > applications in a sensible manner. Real multi-touch is hard, and there are 
>> > a
>> > few roadblocks that I'm not looking forward to.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >   Peter
>>
>> OK, let me break it down into steps:
>>
>> Step 1: add the code to the kernel HID system to
>>   1a) identify this device as being a special case within the HID system
>>   1b) send the device the needed special packet to tell it to start
>> sending data (otherwise it does nothing).
>>   1c) Parse the incoming data (it uses a specific format) into HID
>> events.
>>
>> Alternatively 1a-1c could be done in a userspace library e.g. tslib.
>>
>> Step 2: Add support at the X input layer to handle those packets, in one
>> of the several candidate drivers (e.g. input-tslib, input-evtouch,
>> input-evdev).
>>   As I understand it the consensus here is that this should be in evdev.
>> NOTE: currently the other touchscreens I have from 3M and Dannotech do
>> NOT work under evdev - when evdev is bound to them it doesn't generate
>> any events to X. They do work under tslib and evtouch.
>
> that's probably because they advertise a button/axis combination that evdev
> does interpret correctly, or because they're posting the axis information
> wrongly. I had my hands on an HP Touchsmart for a short while and it was
> posting x/y through Z/Rx.

My Genius PenSketch tablet used to do the same thing. It turned out to
be a quirky HID descriptor which was fixed with the MULTI quirk. Once
I added that quirk it produced correct HID reports. You can try the
quirk with some simple sysfs manipulations or by writing a kernel
patch. I went the patch route and only noticed the sysfs method while
reading the code -- so I don't know the sysfs details. Other quirks
may apply.

Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg