Re: [PATCH inputproto] specs: Clarify rejection for touch events on current owner

2012-01-04 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 06:07:50PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
 Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net

Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org

Cheers,
Daniel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel


Re: [PATCH inputproto] specs: Clarify rejection for touch events on current owner

2011-12-23 Thread Chase Douglas
On 12/23/2011 12:07 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
 The current owner never gets a TouchUpdate(PendingEnd), that event is
 superfluous for the owner. The owner receives a TouchEnd when the touch
 physically ends. If the touch is still active, the owner receives a
 TouchEnd after rejecting the touch.
 
 Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
 ---
 This is the current server behaviour, the spec was wrong.
 
 Note that this section needs rearranging, ownership is described a bit
 out-of-order and possibly hard to understand if you don't already know what
 it is. Will do that in a later patch.

I don't have any issues with this. I believe this came up way back, and
Daniel fought to have it as it is currently written in the protocol. I
suggest waiting for his comments before merging.

Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel