[Bug 14594] xf86-video-ati 6.8. 0 uses #pragma pack incorrectly--server fails to load
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 --- Comment #13 from Blair Sadewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 19:53:23 PST --- Modern NetBSD platforms usually have a tuple like: i386--netbsdelf (note the null second field) for the GNU platform, so something like *-netbsd*) is probably what should be used. Have you received any feedback from e.g. Solaris users about this issue? I'm wondering what other platforms might be affected ... Regards, --Blair -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Bug#468475: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Can't ignore/disable monitor
Brice Goglin skrev: >>> Is this supposed to confirm that Disable works while Ignore does not? >> Yeah, that seems to be the case. > > Good to know, I am closing this bug then. Well, personally, I wouldn't do that. After all, the "correct" and documented option, Ignore, is still broken. I'd say that if you want to report it upstream, then mark the bug as forwarded; if it's a bug in the X server itself, reassign it. (Or maybe even leave the bug open and assigned to xserver-xorg-video-ati, so that others who might scratch their heads over the same problem might find this bug report, and discover this workaround.) But it's up to you, I suppose. (My packages have way too many open bugs, so maybe my way has its drawbacks too...) ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Bug#468475: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Can't ignore/disable monitor
Brice Goglin skrev: > Ove Kaaven wrote: >>> I think the ignore option may be broken in the xserver. What you >>> really want is: >>> Option "Disable" "True" >> Yay for poorly documented options... > > Is this supposed to confirm that Disable works while Ignore does not? Yeah, that seems to be the case. > If so, we need to report the problem upstream. Probably a good idea... > Is everythings working for you now? I think so. GNOME runs at full resolution on my external monitor with the internal LCD panel disabled, using the Disable option. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Bug#468475: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Can't ignore/disable monitor
Ove Kaaven wrote: >> I think the ignore option may be broken in the xserver. What you >> really want is: >> Option "Disable" "True" > > Yay for poorly documented options... Is this supposed to confirm that Disable works while Ignore does not? If so, we need to report the problem upstream. Is everythings working for you now? Brice ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Re: Final split of -ati wrapper and -radeon?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Luc Verhaegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > > Now that -mach64 and -r128 are separate drivers, is there any reason to > > > still keep the ati wrapper and the radeon driver in the same tree? > > yeah, doesn't really matter to me. > Splitting the -ati wrapper out even further would be nice, I'd still like to have it as we need to not trash current users xorg.conf. Granted we could just special case ati in the server ;-) Dave. > Alex > > > ___ > xorg-driver-ati mailing list > xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org > http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati > ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14594] xf86-video-ati 6.8. 0 uses #pragma pack incorrectly--server fails to load
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14594
Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #12 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 11:40:45 PST
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Unfortunately this fix doesn't fix the issue for me (my bug was marked as a
> dupe of this one). While it LOOKS correct, with autoconf 2.5.9 FGL_LINUX is
> still defined after rerunning auto{conf,make} and building.
>
I guess $host_os isn't matching properly on your platform? Any chance you
could find out what autoconf setup is needed in your case? I'm not really an
autoconf expert.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14594] xf86-video-ati 6.8. 0 uses #pragma pack incorrectly--server fails to load
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14594
--- Comment #11 from Owain Ainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 11:22:38
PST ---
Unfortunately this fix doesn't fix the issue for me (my bug was marked as a
dupe of this one). While it LOOKS correct, with autoconf 2.5.9 FGL_LINUX is
still defined after rerunning auto{conf,make} and building.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Re: rv530 AGP + nvidia-agp Problems
Alex Deucher wrote: > AGP cards will probably have issues with enabling the dri (only for 2D > at the moment) since they have a special bridge chip that translates > between AGP and PCIE. We are working on sorting out the info on that > chip. OK, I'll keep a look out. I am subscribed now. Andy. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Re: Final split of -ati wrapper and -radeon?
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:59:27AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Luc Verhaegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > > Now that -mach64 and -r128 are separate drivers, is there any reason to > > > still keep the ati wrapper and the radeon driver in the same tree? > > yeah, doesn't really matter to me. > > Alex So George, when you have the time, put the icing on that cake :) Luc Verhaegen. SUSE/Novell X Driver Developer. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14594] xf86-video-ati 6.8. 0 uses #pragma pack incorrectly--server fails to load
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #10 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 09:04:02 PST --- committed: 74eb981287d76836327830bd51272f605a07e0cc -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Re: Final split of -ati wrapper and -radeon?
Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > >> Now that -mach64 and -r128 are separate drivers, is there any reason to >> still keep the ati wrapper and the radeon driver in the same tree? >> >> Seeing from the commits for mach64 and r128, it seemed like there is >> just a tiny bit of busywork left to make this final split reality. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Luc Verhaegen. >> > > George? Alex? > > Luc Verhaegen. > SUSE/Novell X Driver Developer. > I like this idea myself. If it were finally done, then there'd be a nice example of a highly modular driver architecture for the other drivers to work from. I would think, for instance, that the Intel guys and the NVidia crew both have rather bloated drivers and could stand to have them carved up into more pieces (intel: i810, i830, i915, i945), but still get the benefit of having a single "master driver name" so that users don't get confused. -- Coleman Kane ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Re: Final split of -ati wrapper and -radeon?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Luc Verhaegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > Now that -mach64 and -r128 are separate drivers, is there any reason to > > still keep the ati wrapper and the radeon driver in the same tree? yeah, doesn't really matter to me. Alex ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14594] xf86-video-ati 6.8. 0 uses #pragma pack incorrectly--server fails to load
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 --- Comment #9 from Blair Sadewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 08:53:35 PST --- Yes, it does; thanks. --Blair -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Re: Final split of -ati wrapper and -radeon?
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:55:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > Now that -mach64 and -r128 are separate drivers, is there any reason to > still keep the ati wrapper and the radeon driver in the same tree? > > Seeing from the commits for mach64 and r128, it seemed like there is > just a tiny bit of busywork left to make this final split reality. > > Thanks, > > Luc Verhaegen. George? Alex? Luc Verhaegen. SUSE/Novell X Driver Developer. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14594] xf86-video-ati 6.8. 0 uses #pragma pack incorrectly--server fails to load
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 --- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 07:23:17 PST --- Created an attachment (id=14789) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14789) autoconf patch Does this patch work for you? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Re: rv530 AGP + nvidia-agp Problems
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I've been trying to get my Sapphire X1600pro AGP to work with the latest > git ati/drm on an nforce-2 mobo and have a few problems. > > I have new drm/radeon .ko from git in /lib/modules.. and git/module/.. > > If I don't modprobe nvidia-agp then X starts and functions OK until I > try and use xv - I then get a hard lockup (have tried specifying ports > with mplayer). > > Log (attached - log-xorg-no-nvid) shows AGP not initialising correctly > though drm,agpgart and radeon modules are autoloaded. > > If I first modprobe nvidia-agp then X fails to start, though the box is > still up. > > Log (log-xorg-nvid-loaded) shows some warnings and is truncated, kernel > log ends with a r300 microcode message. > > Mar 2 22:19:14 amd kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.102 > Mar 2 22:19:14 amd kernel: agpgart: Detected NVIDIA nForce2 chipset > Mar 2 22:19:14 amd kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xc000 > Mar 2 22:19:52 amd kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > Mar 2 22:19:52 amd kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC4] enabled at > IRQ 19 > Mar 2 22:19:52 amd kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:00.0[A] -> Link > [APC4] -> GSI 19 (level, high) -> IRQ 19 > Mar 2 22:19:52 amd kernel: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.28.0 20060524 on > minor 0 > Mar 2 22:19:53 amd kernel: agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device > at :00:00.0. > Mar 2 22:19:53 amd kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at > :00:00.0 into 4x mode > Mar 2 22:19:53 amd kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at > :02:00.0 into 4x mode > Mar 2 22:19:53 amd kernel: [drm] Setting GART location based on new > memory map > Mar 2 22:19:53 amd kernel: [drm] Loading R300 Microcode > Mar 2 22:19:53 amd kernel: [drm] writeback test failed > > xorg.config is almost empty - just a keyboard section. > > I am not subscribed to the list. AGP cards will probably have issues with enabling the dri (only for 2D at the moment) since they have a special bridge chip that translates between AGP and PCIE. We are working on sorting out the info on that chip. Alex ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14594] xf86-video-ati 6.8. 0 uses #pragma pack incorrectly--server fails to load
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 06:14:15 PST --- *** Bug 14770 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14770] xf86-video-ati fails on my x800. Doesn't start.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14770 Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 06:14:15 PST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 14594 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14770] xf86-video-ati fails on my x800. Doesn't start.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14770 --- Comment #9 from Owain Ainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 02:04:44 PST --- Actually, sorry. User error I actually made sure i reran autoconf and it worked fine with that patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 14770] xf86-video-ati fails on my x800. Doesn't start.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14770 --- Comment #8 from Owain Ainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-03 01:44:49 PST --- I'm afraid not. Same failure in the same place. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
Bug#467235: xserver-xorg-video-ati: [radeon] images not scaled properly when using EXA
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:09:46 +0100 Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it does not help, please send the corresponding Xorg.0.log. OK, attached is the Xorg.0.log from 1:6.7.197-1 > By the way, you have some useless/not-recommended options in your > xorg.conf, see below. I commented most of those out: Section "Device" Identifier "ATI Radeon Mobility M6 LY" Driver "radeon" #Option "UseFBDev" "false" #Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "true" Option "EnablePageFlip""on" Option "AGPFastWrite" "on" Option "AccelMethod" "EXA" Option "DynamicClocks" "on" Option "BIOSHotkeys" "on" #Option "BackingStore" "true" Option "ColorTiling" "on" Option "AccelDFS" "on" #Option "RenderAccel" "off" #Option "CRT2Position" "Clone" Option "Monitor-LVDS" "Internal Panel" Option "Monitor-VGA" "External VGA" EndSection -- Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA X.Org X Server 1.4.0 Release Date: 5 September 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4-3) Current Operating System: Linux evinrude 2.6.24.2 #1 PREEMPT Sat Feb 16 16:34:57 EST 2008 i686 Build Date: 29 September 2007 04:19:41PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Mar 1 18:04:08 2008 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" (==) ServerLayout "Default Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "" (**) | |-->Device "ATI Radeon Mobility M6 LY" (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen". Using a default monitor configuration. (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard" (**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse" (**) |-->Input Device "Wacom Cursor" (**) |-->Input Device "Wacom Stylus" (**) |-->Input Device "Wacom Eraser" (==) Automatically adding devices (==) Automatically enabling devices (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/CID" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (==) Including the default font path /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc,/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic,/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1,/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi,/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi,/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType. (**) FontPath set to: unix/:7100, /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc, /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1, /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi, /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi, /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc, /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic, /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled, /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled, /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1, /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi, /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi, /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType (==) RgbPath set to "/etc/X11/rgb" (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib/xorg/modules" (**) Extension "Composite" is enabled (**) Extension "RENDER" is enabled (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket) (II) Loader magic: 0x81d7b40 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 X.Org Video Driver: 2.0 X.Org XInput driver : 2.0 X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libpcidata.so (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.4.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, vers
