Question #275459 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/275459
lichangsheng posted a new comment:
Hi Bettina,
I had a look at (tsuji, 1992). I think your understanding of the paper of
(Tsuji et at., 1992) is correct. It is described differently in the paper of
(tsuji, 1992). The difference between (tsuji, 1992) and (cundall, 1979) may be
that when the contact damping should be addad, before (Tsuji et at., 1992) or
after (cundall, 1979) the check for Mohr-Coloumb criterion.I have thought for a
few days. In the source code of yade(HertzMindlin.cpp lines 407-420), I think
Mohr-Coulomb criterion may be violated as you described,although it is hard to
happen. However, I'm not really sure which approach is better/more correct
today.
In the past, I also felt confused about this question. At present, I often
adopt the local damping used in PFC2D (see PFC2D manual, Version 4.0 , Theory
and Background). I will ask other people for this question. I will tell you, if
I have a answer. I really hope some experts or you can give a reasonable
interpretation.
Thanks,
LI Chang-Sheng
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
