[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1680417] [NEW] There is no validation DVR is enabled before running -neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_dvr.NetworkDvrTest tests
Public bug reported: When I am running neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_dvr.NetworkDvrTest tests on non-DVR environment they failed as expected. The problem is those tests should not run if the environment did not configure with DVR. We should add a mechanism that checks if DVR is configured before it runs. Version Ocata How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run the test neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_dvr.NetworkDvrTest on non-DVR environment. ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1680417 Title: There is no validation DVR is enabled before running -neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_dvr.NetworkDvrTest tests Status in neutron: New Bug description: When I am running neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_dvr.NetworkDvrTest tests on non-DVR environment they failed as expected. The problem is those tests should not run if the environment did not configure with DVR. We should add a mechanism that checks if DVR is configured before it runs. Version Ocata How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run the test neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_dvr.NetworkDvrTest on non-DVR environment. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1680417/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1679816] [NEW] There is no validation for image type in test.neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_trunk.TrunkTest.test_subport_connectivity
Public bug reported: Description of problem: test.neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_trunk.TrunkTest.test_subport_connectivity To run this test we should not use Cirros image. Before running the test we should verify which image is in use. If the test run with an unsupported image like Cirros image, it will fail with: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/neutron/tests/tempest/scenario/test_trunk.py", line 240, in test_subport_connectivity server['ssh_client'].exec_command(command) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tempest/common/utils/linux/remote_client.py", line 36, in wrapper return function(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tempest/common/utils/linux/remote_client.py", line 92, in exec_command return self.ssh_client.exec_command(cmd) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tempest/lib/common/ssh.py", line 201, in exec_command stderr=err_data, stdout=out_data) tempest.lib.exceptions.SSHExecCommandFailed: Command 'set -eu -o pipefail; PATH=$PATH:/sbin; IFACE=$(ip l | grep "^[0-9]*: e" | cut -d \: -f 2) && sudo su -c "ip l a link $IFACE name $IFACE.10 type vlan id 10 && ip l s up dev $IFACE.10 && dhclient $IFACE.10"', exit status: 2, stderr: ip: RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Ocata How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run the test with Cirros image 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436756/8/neutron/tests/tempest/api/test_trunk.py@242 ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679816 Title: There is no validation for image type in test.neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_trunk.TrunkTest.test_subport_connectivity Status in neutron: New Bug description: Description of problem: test.neutron.tests.tempest.scenario.test_trunk.TrunkTest.test_subport_connectivity To run this test we should not use Cirros image. Before running the test we should verify which image is in use. If the test run with an unsupported image like Cirros image, it will fail with: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/neutron/tests/tempest/scenario/test_trunk.py", line 240, in test_subport_connectivity server['ssh_client'].exec_command(command) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tempest/common/utils/linux/remote_client.py", line 36, in wrapper return function(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tempest/common/utils/linux/remote_client.py", line 92, in exec_command return self.ssh_client.exec_command(cmd) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tempest/lib/common/ssh.py", line 201, in exec_command stderr=err_data, stdout=out_data) tempest.lib.exceptions.SSHExecCommandFailed: Command 'set -eu -o pipefail; PATH=$PATH:/sbin; IFACE=$(ip l | grep "^[0-9]*: e" | cut -d \: -f 2) && sudo su -c "ip l a link $IFACE name $IFACE.10 type vlan id 10 && ip l s up dev $IFACE.10 && dhclient $IFACE.10"', exit status: 2, stderr: ip: RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Ocata How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run the test with Cirros image 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436756/8/neutron/tests/tempest/api/test_trunk.py@242 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1679816/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1679703] [NEW] Unable to boot instance with VF( direct-port ) because the PF is not online
Public bug reported: Description of problem: Booted VM with Direct-physical port (The entire PF is associated to the instance). When I deleted the instance I expected that PF will be available and online. Actually when I am trying to boot instance with direct port (VF) I get this error message : VM in error state- fault | {"message": "Exceeded maximum number of retries. Exceeded max scheduling attempts 3 for instance 102fde1b-22d3-4b05-8246-0f1af520455a. Last exception: internal error: Unable to configure VF 4 of PF 'p1p1' because the PF is not online. Please change host network config", "code": 500, "details": " File \"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/conductor/manager.py\", line 524, in build_instances | filter_properties, instances[0].uuid) [root@compute-0 ~]# ifconfig |grep p1p1 --->PF is not online it's impossible to create an instance with a direct port (VF) version: Ocata How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Deploy SRIOV setup with PF support 2. boot instance with Direct-physical port 3. Delete VM that is associated to PF 4. boot instance with Direct port (VF) Expected results: VM with direct port should be booted. PF should be released Additional info: Workaround - systemctl restart network ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "failure.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679703/+attachment/4854330/+files/failure.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679703 Title: Unable to boot instance with VF( direct-port ) because the PF is not online Status in neutron: New Bug description: Description of problem: Booted VM with Direct-physical port (The entire PF is associated to the instance). When I deleted the instance I expected that PF will be available and online. Actually when I am trying to boot instance with direct port (VF) I get this error message : VM in error state- fault | {"message": "Exceeded maximum number of retries. Exceeded max scheduling attempts 3 for instance 102fde1b-22d3-4b05-8246-0f1af520455a. Last exception: internal error: Unable to configure VF 4 of PF 'p1p1' because the PF is not online. Please change host network config", "code": 500, "details": " File \"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/conductor/manager.py\", line 524, in build_instances | filter_properties, instances[0].uuid) [root@compute-0 ~]# ifconfig |grep p1p1 --->PF is not online it's impossible to create an instance with a direct port (VF) version: Ocata How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Deploy SRIOV setup with PF support 2. boot instance with Direct-physical port 3. Delete VM that is associated to PF 4. boot instance with Direct port (VF) Expected results: VM with direct port should be booted. PF should be released Additional info: Workaround - systemctl restart network To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1679703/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1671478] [NEW] Tests in neutron.tests.tempest.api.test_revisions.TestRevisions don't clean up network resources
Public bug reported: Tests in neutron.tests.tempest.api.test_revisions.TestRevisions create networks but don't remove them when each test is finished. Cleanup only occurs after all the tests in RoutersTest finish to run. ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671478 Title: Tests in neutron.tests.tempest.api.test_revisions.TestRevisions don't clean up network resources Status in neutron: New Bug description: Tests in neutron.tests.tempest.api.test_revisions.TestRevisions create networks but don't remove them when each test is finished. Cleanup only occurs after all the tests in RoutersTest finish to run. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1671478/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1616769] Re: Cant revert neutron-port PF to VF because sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value
I think it valid case that user will revert from PF to VF port. When we create vm with PF port (direct physical ) /sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs parameter gets "0" value which is expected , but when I delete this port I expected that /sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs will return to previous value so I can set VF ports. the problem still exist on OSP-1o - newton ** Summary changed: - When assigning neutron-port to PF sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value + Cant revert neutron-port PF to VF because sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value ** Summary changed: - Cant revert neutron-port PF to VF because sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value + Cant revert from neutron-port PF to VF because sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value ** Changed in: nova Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616769 Title: Cant revert from neutron-port PF to VF because sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: Description of problem: When manage SR-IOV PFs as Neutron ports I can see that /sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs parameter gets "0" value. When I delete the PF port so I can switch to SRIOV - direct port (VF) I can't boot vm because sriov_numvfs parameter equal to "0" value Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-lib-0.3.0-0.20160803002107.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160813031056.7cf5e07.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-5.0.0-0.20160812094704.ec20f7f.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch $ rpm -qa |grep nova python-novaclient-5.0.1-0.20160724130722.6b11a1c.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch puppet-nova-9.1.0-0.20160813014843.b94f0a0.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-novncproxy-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-conductor-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch python-nova-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-cert-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-console-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Set SRIOV ENV and PF support : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQbJlLI1hSlE4uwKpmVd0BoGSDBd8Z0lTzx5itQ6WL0/edit# 2. BOOT VM that assign to PF (neutron port- direct-physical) - should boot well 3. check cat /sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs (= 0) 4. delete vm and check again sriov_numvfs (=0) 5. I expect that numvfs should return to the default value that was configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1616769/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1666864] [NEW] function does not return correct create router timestamp
Public bug reported: Version: OSP-10 Newton Test failed : neutron.tests.tempest.api.test_timestamp.TestTimeStampWithL3.test_show_router_attribute_with_timestamp At creation the timestamp is correct: u'created_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'updated_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z' when "show" function display the timestamp it display it with ~3 sec difference: u'created_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'updated_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:26Z' show function display incorrect timestamp 218 def test_show_router_attribute_with_timestamp(self): 219 router = self.create_router(router_name='test') 220 import ipdb;ipdb.set_trace() --> 221 body = self.client.show_router(router['id']) 222 show_router = body['router'] 223 # verify the timestamp from creation and showed is same 224 import ipdb;ipdb.set_trace() 225 self.assertEqual(router['created_at'], 226 show_router['created_at']) ipdb> router {u'status': u'ACTIVE', u'external_gateway_info': None, u'availability_zone_hints': [], u'availability_zones': [], u'description': u'', u'admin_state_up': False, u'tenant_id': u'8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2', u'created_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'updated_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'flavor_id': None, u'revision_number': 3, u'routes': [], u'project_id': u'8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2', u'id': u'545e74b0-2f3d-43b8-8678-93bbb3f1f6f3', u'name': u'test'} ipdb> n 2017-02-22 10:47:55.084 6919 INFO tempest.lib.common.rest_client [req-eef7ded4-bb01-4401-96cd-325c01b2230b ] Request (TestTimeStampWithL3:test_show_router_attribute_with_timestamp): 200 GET http://10.0.0.104:9696/v2.0/routers/545e74b0-2f3d-43b8-8678-93bbb3f1f6f3 0.224s 2017-02-22 10:47:55.086 6919 DEBUG tempest.lib.common.rest_client [req-eef7ded4-bb01-4401-96cd-325c01b2230b ] Request - Headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Accept': 'application/json', 'X-Auth-Token': ''} Body: None Response - Headers: {'status': '200', u'content-length': '462', 'content-location': 'http://10.0.0.104:9696/v2.0/routers/545e74b0-2f3d-43b8-8678-93bbb3f1f6f3', u'date': 'Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:47:56 GMT', u'content-type': 'application/json', u'connection': 'close', u'x-openstack-request-id': 'req-eef7ded4-bb01-4401-96cd-325c01b2230b'} Body: {"router": {"status": "ACTIVE", "external_gateway_info": null, "availability_zone_hints": [], "availability_zones": ["nova"], "description": "", "admin_state_up": false, "tenant_id": "8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2", "created_at": "2017-02-22T10:47:24Z", "updated_at": "2017-02-22T10:47:26Z", "flavor_id": null, "revision_number": 8, "routes": [], "project_id": "8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2", "id": "545e74b0-2f3d-43b8-8678-93bbb3f1f6f3", "name": "test"}} _log_request_full tempest/lib/common/rest_client.py:431 > /home/centos/tempest-upstream/neutron/neutron/tests/tempest/api/test_timestamp.py(222)test_show_router_attribute_with_timestamp() ipdb> router {u'status': u'ACTIVE', u'external_gateway_info': None, u'availability_zone_hints': [], u'availability_zones': [], u'description': u'', u'admin_state_up': False, u'tenant_id': u'8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2', u'created_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'updated_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'flavor_id': None, u'revision_number': 3, u'routes': [], u'project_id': u'8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2', u'id': u'545e74b0-2f3d-43b8-8678-93bbb3f1f6f3', u'name': u'test'} ipdb> show_router {u'status': u'ACTIVE', u'external_gateway_info': None, u'availability_zone_hints': [], u'availability_zones': [u'nova'], u'description': u'', u'admin_state_up': False, u'tenant_id': u'8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2', u'created_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'updated_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:26Z', u'flavor_id': None, u'revision_number': 8, u'routes': [], u'project_id': u'8b9cd1ebd13f4172a0c63789ee9c0de2', u'id': u'545e74b0-2f3d-43b8-8678-93bbb3f1f6f3', u'name': u'test'} ipdb> ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666864 Title: function does not return correct create router timestamp Status in neutron: New Bug description: Version: OSP-10 Newton Test failed : neutron.tests.tempest.api.test_timestamp.TestTimeStampWithL3.test_show_router_attribute_with_timestamp At creation the timestamp is correct: u'created_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'updated_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z' when "show" function display the timestamp it display it with ~3 sec difference: u'created_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:24Z', u'updated_at': u'2017-02-22T10:47:26Z' show function display incorrect timestamp 218 def test_show_router_attribute_with_timestamp(self): 219 router = self.create_router(router_name='test') 220 import ipdb
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1504941] Re: RBAC-RFE- neutron net-show command should display all tenant that using the network
** Changed in: neutron Status: Expired => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504941 Title: RBAC-RFE- neutron net-show command should display all tenant that using the network Status in neutron: New Bug description: On rdo- liberty I thested neutron rbac feature . when network assigned to more then 1 tenant we still see one tenant in neutron net-show [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron net-show 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc +---+--+ | Field | Value| +---+--+ | admin_state_up| True | | id| 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | | mtu | 0| | name | internal_ipv4_a | | provider:network_type | vxlan| | provider:physical_network | | | provider:segmentation_id | 70 | | router:external | False| | shared| False| | status| ACTIVE | | subnets | 9a1a387e-88cf-484a-8b12-5a1834be0233 | | tenant_id | fa4add4659704239b771b0bccb8b6829 | +---+--+ this network shared in 2 tenants : [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron rbac-list +--+--+ | id | object_id | +--+--+ | 4f1a9c9d-e820-46e4-b431-b3142c6bb245 | 818dd42f-f627-45d4-a578-dd475b9e19e4 | | 8c995ab1-dea6-411b-854c-a405cf5365fa | 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | | abb375b9-95d0-4297-80f1-3f22f0f84a9e | b071a769-0d50-4d25-8730-fed3dea13a2f | | f3122b92-f47a-4a0f-a422-c9f7ed482341 | 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.1-dev1.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1504941/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1658689] [NEW] unclear error message while booting VM with security group when port_security_enabled=false
Public bug reported: When port_security_enabled = False its not possible to boot instance with security group. The instance is in "ERROR" state . The log display unclear error message : [root@controller-0 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-6.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.4.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-bigswitch-lldp-9.40.0-1.1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.4.2-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-tests-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-9.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-bigswitch-agent-9.40.0-1.1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch [root@controller-0 ~]# rpm -qa |grep nova openstack-nova-cert-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch python-novaclient-6.0.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-novncproxy-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-console-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-conductor-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-compute-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch puppet-nova-9.4.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-nova-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "log bug" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658689/+attachment/4808071/+files/log%20bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658689 Title: unclear error message while booting VM with security group when port_security_enabled=false Status in neutron: New Bug description: When port_security_enabled = False its not possible to boot instance with security group. The instance is in "ERROR" state . The log display unclear error message : [root@controller-0 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-6.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.4.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-bigswitch-lldp-9.40.0-1.1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.4.2-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-tests-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-9.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-bigswitch-agent-9.40.0-1.1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.1.0-8.el7ost.noarch [root@controller-0 ~]# rpm -qa |grep nova openstack-nova-cert-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch python-novaclient-6.0.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-novncproxy-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-console-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-conductor-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-compute-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch puppet-nova-9.4.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-nova-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-14.0.2-8.el7ost.noarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1658689/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1625570] [NEW] fullstack : should add test of ensure traffic is using DSCP marks outbound
Public bug reported: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190285/57/specs/newton/ml2-qos-with- dscp.rst we should add in fullstack a test that ensure traffic is using DSCP marks outbound ** Affects: neutron Importance: Medium Status: New ** Tags: qos -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625570 Title: fullstack : should add test of ensure traffic is using DSCP marks outbound Status in neutron: New Bug description: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190285/57/specs/newton/ml2-qos-with- dscp.rst we should add in fullstack a test that ensure traffic is using DSCP marks outbound To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1625570/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1616769] [NEW] When assigning neutron-port to PF sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value
Public bug reported: escription of problem: When manage SR-IOV PFs as Neutron ports I can see that /sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs parameter gets "0" value . when I delete the PF port so I can switch to SRIOV - direct port (VF) I cant boot vm because sriov_numvfs parameter equal to "0" value Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-lib-0.3.0-0.20160803002107.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160813031056.7cf5e07.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-5.0.0-0.20160812094704.ec20f7f.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch [root@controller1 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep nova python-novaclient-5.0.1-0.20160724130722.6b11a1c.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch puppet-nova-9.1.0-0.20160813014843.b94f0a0.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-novncproxy-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-conductor-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch python-nova-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-cert-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-console-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Set SRIOV ENV and PF support : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQbJlLI1hSlE4uwKpmVd0BoGSDBd8Z0lTzx5itQ6WL0/edit# 2. BOOT VM that assign to PF (neutron port- direct-physical) - should boot well 3. check cat /sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs (=0) 4. delete vm and check again sriov_numvfs (=0) 5. I expect that numvfs should return to the default value that was configured ** Affects: nova Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616769 Title: When assigning neutron-port to PF sriov_numvfs parameter get "0" value Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: escription of problem: When manage SR-IOV PFs as Neutron ports I can see that /sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs parameter gets "0" value . when I delete the PF port so I can switch to SRIOV - direct port (VF) I cant boot vm because sriov_numvfs parameter equal to "0" value Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-lib-0.3.0-0.20160803002107.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160813031056.7cf5e07.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-5.0.0-0.20160812094704.ec20f7f.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch [root@controller1 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep nova python-novaclient-5.0.1-0.20160724130722.6b11a1c.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch puppet-nova-9.1.0-0.20160813014843.b94f0a0.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-novncproxy-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-conductor-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch python-nova-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-cert-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-console-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Set SRIOV ENV and PF support : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQbJlLI1hSlE4uwKpmVd0BoGSDBd8Z
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1616442] [NEW] SRIOV agent error when VM booted with direct-physical port
Public bug reported: When assigning neutron port to PF (neutron port type - direct-physical ) the vm is booted and active but there is errors in sriov agent log attached file with the errors Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHOS-10 [root@controller1 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-lib-0.3.0-0.20160803002107.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160813031056.7cf5e07.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-5.0.0-0.20160812094704.ec20f7f.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch [root@controller1 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep nova python-novaclient-5.0.1-0.20160724130722.6b11a1c.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch puppet-nova-9.1.0-0.20160813014843.b94f0a0.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-novncproxy-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-conductor-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch python-nova-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-cert-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-console-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.deploy SRIOV setup and set PF functionality you can use guide : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQbJlLI1hSlE4uwKpmVd0BoGSDBd8Z0lTzx5itQ6WL0/edit# 2.boot vm & assign it to PF 3.check in compute node sriov agent log ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "sriov agent log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616442/+attachment/4727004/+files/sriov%20agent%20log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616442 Title: SRIOV agent error when VM booted with direct-physical port Status in neutron: New Bug description: When assigning neutron port to PF (neutron port type - direct-physical ) the vm is booted and active but there is errors in sriov agent log attached file with the errors Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHOS-10 [root@controller1 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-lib-0.3.0-0.20160803002107.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160813031056.7cf5e07.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160816191643.4e7301e.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-5.0.0-0.20160812094704.ec20f7f.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160817153328.b9169e3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160817171450.e1ac68f.el7ost.noarch [root@controller1 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep nova python-novaclient-5.0.1-0.20160724130722.6b11a1c.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch puppet-nova-9.1.0-0.20160813014843.b94f0a0.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-novncproxy-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-conductor-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch python-nova-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-cert-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-console-14.0.0-0.20160817225441.04cef3b.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.deploy SRIOV setup and set PF functionality you can use guide : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQbJlLI1hSlE4uwKpmVd0BoGSDBd8Z0lTzx5itQ6WL0/edit# 2.boot vm & assign it to PF 3.check in compute node sriov agent log To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1616442/+subscrip
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1614092] [NEW] SRIOV - PF / VM that assign to PF does not get vlan tag
Public bug reported: During RFE testing Manage SR-IOV PFs as Neutron ports, I found VM booted with Neutron port vnic_type direct-physical but it does not get access to DHCP server. The problem is that the PF / VM does not get VLAN tag with the internal vlan. Workaround : Enter to the VM via console and set vlan interface. version RHOS 10 python-neutronclient-4.2.1-0.20160721230146.3b1c538.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160720211704.c3e491c.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160725142451.4061b39.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.2.1-0.20160726025313.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614092 Title: SRIOV - PF / VM that assign to PF does not get vlan tag Status in neutron: New Bug description: During RFE testing Manage SR-IOV PFs as Neutron ports, I found VM booted with Neutron port vnic_type direct-physical but it does not get access to DHCP server. The problem is that the PF / VM does not get VLAN tag with the internal vlan. Workaround : Enter to the VM via console and set vlan interface. version RHOS 10 python-neutronclient-4.2.1-0.20160721230146.3b1c538.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160720211704.c3e491c.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160725142451.4061b39.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.2.1-0.20160726025313.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1614092/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1614086] [NEW] SRIOV- when numvfs=0 SRIOV agent is failed to start
Public bug reported: Deployed SRIOV ENV with X VFs (for example 4 ). After that I wanted to move the VFs. When setting SRIOV system with numvfs=0 and restart SRIOV agent it failed to start # echo 0> sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs # systemctl restart neutron-sriov-nic-agent # systemctl status neutron-sriov-nic-agent version - RHOS10 python-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160722053816.0c73910.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-4.2.1-0.20160721230146.3b1c538.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160720211704.c3e491c.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160725142451.4061b39.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.2.1-0.20160726025313.405f896.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160720211704.c3e491c.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160722053816.0c73910.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch attached the log file ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "sriov log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614086/+attachment/4722621/+files/agent%20fail -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614086 Title: SRIOV- when numvfs=0 SRIOV agent is failed to start Status in neutron: New Bug description: Deployed SRIOV ENV with X VFs (for example 4 ). After that I wanted to move the VFs. When setting SRIOV system with numvfs=0 and restart SRIOV agent it failed to start # echo 0> sys/class/net/enp5s0f1/device/sriov_numvfs # systemctl restart neutron-sriov-nic-agent # systemctl status neutron-sriov-nic-agent version - RHOS10 python-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160722053816.0c73910.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-4.2.1-0.20160721230146.3b1c538.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160720211704.c3e491c.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch puppet-neutron-9.1.0-0.20160725142451.4061b39.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.2.1-0.20160726025313.405f896.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-9.0.0-0.20160720211704.c3e491c.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.0.0-0.20160722053816.0c73910.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch attached the log file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1614086/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1613610] [NEW] SRIOV- PFs aren't showing up as available
Public bug reported: Description of problem: PFs aren't showing up as available making it not possible to boot vms with PFs When I am trying to boot VM with Neutron port with vnic type - direct - physical there is an error. attached the error. The ENV is SRIOV 1 compute & 1 controller Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): python-nova-14.0.0-0.20160726054215.02421fc.el7ost.noarch python-novaclient-5.0.1-0.20160724130722.6b11a1c.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-compute-14.0.0-0.20160726054215.02421fc.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.0-0.20160726054215.02421fc.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.2.1-0.20160726025313.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-4.2.1-0.20160721230146.3b1c538.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Deploy SRIOV ENV 2.Config the ENV to work with PF (no VFS configured ) 3.Create neutron port vnic type= direct physical 4.boot vm with neutrn port that created Actual results: VM is in ERROR state ** Affects: nova Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "pf nova boot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613610/+attachment/4721723/+files/pf%20nova%20boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613610 Title: SRIOV- PFs aren't showing up as available Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: Description of problem: PFs aren't showing up as available making it not possible to boot vms with PFs When I am trying to boot VM with Neutron port with vnic type - direct - physical there is an error. attached the error. The ENV is SRIOV 1 compute & 1 controller Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): python-nova-14.0.0-0.20160726054215.02421fc.el7ost.noarch python-novaclient-5.0.1-0.20160724130722.6b11a1c.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-compute-14.0.0-0.20160726054215.02421fc.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-14.0.0-0.20160726054215.02421fc.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.2.1-0.20160726025313.405f896.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-sriov-nic-agent-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-9.0.0-0.20160726001729.6a23add.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-4.2.1-0.20160721230146.3b1c538.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Deploy SRIOV ENV 2.Config the ENV to work with PF (no VFS configured ) 3.Create neutron port vnic type= direct physical 4.boot vm with neutrn port that created Actual results: VM is in ERROR state To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1613610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1608176] [NEW] SRIOV-port creation : its possible to create more direct ports than available vif.
Public bug reported: When creating sriov ports we can create more ports than vif's are avalible for example we have 4 vifs and created more than 4 direct ports . [root@compute1 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron port-list +--+--+---+- | id | name | mac_address | fixed_ips | | 22e0ae33-1f9e-47f5-9b20-2a3277b15959 | | fa:16:3e:82:52:ea | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.13"} | | 2f6c4371-fffe-4834-a6aa-725ae72f4d02 | | fa:16:3e:9c:e9:bb | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.4"} | | 98b62507-e21b-49e6-880e-34fa14f6b986 | | fa:16:3e:8e:73:40 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.5"} | | a9a28d02-4342-4575-9f9a-8ae70ab8bd2a | | fa:16:3e:7d:3f:04 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.14"} | | b466da32-fff4-46d8-a134-d861105e966f | | fa:16:3e:3c:81:a5 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.6"} | | d3601592-0133-4c65-ab85-cc142325ce29 | | fa:16:3e:c1:81:01 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.3"} | | d67e2fa6-6805-4baa-882e-9cf54714ba20 | | fa:16:3e:32:26:f5 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.2"} | | e5b5290d-1824-4bd9-aecb-81032b38ac60 | | fa:16:3e:58:8f:c9 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.7"} | +--+--+---+- [root@compute1 ~(keystone_admin)]# ip link show 4: enp5s0f1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovs-system state UP mode DEFAULT qlen 1000 link/ether a0:36:9f:7f:28:ba brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff vf 0 MAC fa:16:3e:3c:81:a5, vlan 208, spoof checking on, link-state auto vf 1 MAC fa:16:3e:9c:e9:bb, vlan 208, spoof checking on, link-state auto vf 2 MAC fa:16:3e:8e:73:40, vlan 208, spoof checking on, link-state auto vf 3 MAC fa:16:3e:c1:81:01, vlan 208, spoof checking on, link-state auto [root@controller1 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-7.0.4-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.4-3.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-7.0.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-7.0.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.4-3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.4-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.4-3.el7ost.noarch osp 8 ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608176 Title: SRIOV-port creation : its possible to create more direct ports than available vif. Status in neutron: New Bug description: When creating sriov ports we can create more ports than vif's are avalible for example we have 4 vifs and created more than 4 direct ports . [root@compute1 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron port-list +--+--+---+- | id | name | mac_address | fixed_ips | | 22e0ae33-1f9e-47f5-9b20-2a3277b15959 | | fa:16:3e:82:52:ea | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.13"} | | 2f6c4371-fffe-4834-a6aa-725ae72f4d02 | | fa:16:3e:9c:e9:bb | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.4"} | | 98b62507-e21b-49e6-880e-34fa14f6b986 | | fa:16:3e:8e:73:40 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.5"} | | a9a28d02-4342-4575-9f9a-8ae70ab8bd2a | | fa:16:3e:7d:3f:04 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.14"} | | b466da32-fff4-46d8-a134-d861105e966f | | fa:16:3e:3c:81:a5 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.6"} | | d3601592-0133-4c65-ab85-cc142325ce29 | | fa:16:3e:c1:81:01 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.3"} | | d67e2fa6-6805-4baa-882e-9cf54714ba20 | | fa:16:3e:32:26:f5 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.2"} | | e5b5290d-1824-4bd9-aecb-81032b38ac60 | | fa:16:3e:58:8f:c9 | {"subnet_id": "212d47a3-93b7-400d-8322-84717c780e21", "ip_address": "192.168.1.7"} | +--+--+---+
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1571657] [NEW] it's possible to create IPv6 subnet without address & RA mode
Public bug reported: We can create IPv6 subnet without address mode & Ra_mode parameters . When creating this kind of subnet and attach it to network that have ipv4 when booting VM it does not get any ip address . No Meaning produce ipv6 subnet without those parameters [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neut openstack-neutron-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-common-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch python-neutronclient-4.1.2-0.20160304195803.5d28651.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.0.3-0.20160227020344.999828a.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron net-list +--+--+-+ | id | name | subnets | +--+--+-+ | e1af28fe-6725-471f-9dcb-21139dd815af | tempest-network-smoke--922626247 | dd3f38b2-ba3d-49cf-b5c5-9fd05af1b207 2003::/64 | | | | bdd6fe30-d278-437f-97a1-10a93862a338 10.100.0.0/28 | | ae26ce01-d0f4-46ac-ac74-f652477b0a4c | external_network | 1771fd81-9c6c-4f5b-a7e9-246221e28577 10.35.166.0/24 | +--+--+-+ [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron subnet-create e1af28fe-6725-471f-9dcb-21139dd815af 2001:db1:0::2/64 --name dhcpv6_slaac_subnete --ip-version 6Created a new subnet: +---+--+ | Field | Value | +---+--+ | allocation_pools | {"start": "2001:db1::2", "end": "2001:db1:::::"} | | cidr | 2001:db1::/64 | | dns_nameservers | | | enable_dhcp | True | | gateway_ip| 2001:db1::1 | | host_routes | | | id| 6d30c5c2-c7a7-4439-aa7b-24c10bd26ec8 | | ip_version| 6 | | ipv6_address_mode | | | ipv6_ra_mode | | | name | dhcpv6_slaac_subnete | | network_id| e1af28fe-6725-471f-9dcb-21139dd815af | | subnetpool_id | | | tenant_id | 9a0058cf974c47ecb4f778d8e199f7ae | +---+--+ ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571657 Title: it's possible to create IPv6 subnet without address & RA mode Status in neutron: New Bug description: We can create IPv6 subnet without address mode & Ra_mode parameters . When creating this kind of subnet and attach it to network that have ipv4 when booting VM it does not get any ip address . No Meaning produce ipv6 subnet without those parameters [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neut openstack-neutron-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-common-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a3.el7.centos.noarch python-neutronclient-4.1.2-0.20160304195803.5d28651.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-lib-0.0.3-0.20160227020344.999828a.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-metering-agent-8.0.0.0b4-0.20160304174813.0ae20a
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1570241] Re: ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error during type the command: nova virtual-interface-list
less /var/log/nova/nova-api.log 2016-04-17 05:19:12.697 24505 WARNING keystonemiddleware.auth_token [-] Authorization failed for token 2016-04-17 05:19:12.698 24505 WARNING keystonemiddleware.auth_token [-] Identity response: {"error": {"message": "Could not find token: 058d81b26ee34f36b0e5b4de334ef5be", "code": 404, "title": "Not Found"}} 2016-04-17 05:19:12.700 24505 WARNING keystonemiddleware.auth_token [-] Authorization failed for token 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions [req-606035da-18cf-4a79-bbf6-657dd4685597 2221c6978efd43df8e634932691fa06f 6d3b7a1a69cf4bb1ac75224f2cfaa12e - - -] Unexpected exception in API method 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions Traceback (most recent call last): 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/api/openstack/extensions.py", line 478, in wrapped 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions return f(*args, **kwargs) 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/api/openstack/compute/virtual_interfaces.py", line 69, in index 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions entity_maker=_translate_vif_summary_view) 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/api/openstack/compute/virtual_interfaces.py", line 60, in _items 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions vifs = self.network_api.get_vifs_by_instance(context, instance) 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/network/neutronv2/api.py", line 1451, in get_vifs_by_instance 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions raise NotImplementedError() 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions NotImplementedError 2016-04-17 06:05:49.290 24504 ERROR nova.api.openstack.extensions less /var/log/nova/nova-compute.log 383e04ac, exception: Requested operation is not valid: cpu affinity is not supported 2016-04-17 06:07:49.635 19328 WARNING nova.virt.libvirt.driver [req-d9c8320c-bfd6-40ed-a8e7-32f5d8bf4ed5 - - - - -] couldn't obtain the vpu count from domain id: bae94215-cda7-4307-9425-f491f2be2343, exception: Requested operation is not valid: cpu affinity is not supported 2016-04-17 06:08:51.632 19328 WARNING nova.virt.libvirt.driver [req-d9c8320c-bfd6-40ed-a8e7-32f5d8bf4ed5 - - - - -] couldn't obtain the vpu count from domain id: 37fecbe8-82bf-4b3b-83a9-559e383e04ac, exception: Requested operation is not valid: cpu affinity is not supported 2016-04-17 06:08:51.635 19328 WARNING nova.virt.libvirt.driver [req-d9c8320c-bfd6-40ed-a8e7-32f5d8bf4ed5 - - - - -] couldn't obtain the vpu count from domain id: bae94215-cda7-4307-9425-f491f2be2343, exception: Requested operation is not valid: cpu affinity is not supported ** Changed in: nova Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570241 Title: ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error during type the command: nova virtual-interface-list Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: [stack@undercloud ~]$ nova virtual-interface-list bae94215-cda7-4307-9425-f491f2be2343 ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/ and attach the Nova API log if possible. (HTTP 500) (Request-ID: req-2dc1eff6-874c-4a7c-b731-a56a6b9796fb) I run the test with tempest on ospd setup 1 controller one compute after the test failed and I got this log : Traceback (most recent call last): File "/root/tempest-dir/tempest/test.py", line 113, in wrapper return f(self, *func_args, **func_kwargs) File "/root/tempest-dir/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_virtual_interfaces.py", line 56, in test_list_virtual_interfaces self.client.list_virtual_interfaces(self.server_id) File "/root/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/services/compute/servers_client.py", line 478, in list_virtual_interfaces 'os-virtual-interfaces'])) File "/root/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/common/rest_client.py", line 274, in get return self.request('GET', url, extra_headers, headers) File "/root/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/services/compute/base_compute_client.py", line 53, in request method, url, extra_headers, headers, body) File "/root/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/common/rest_client.py", line 642, in request resp, resp_body) File "/root/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/common/rest_client.py", line 761, in _error_checker message=message) ServerFault: Got server fault Details: Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/ and attach the
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1570241] [NEW] ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error during type the command: nova virtual-interface-list
Public bug reported: [stack@undercloud ~]$ nova virtual-interface-list bae94215-cda7-4307-9425-f491f2be2343 ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/ and attach the Nova API log if possible. (HTTP 500) (Request-ID: req-2dc1eff6-874c-4a7c-b731-a56a6b9796fb) [stack@undercloud ~]$ rpm -qa |grep -i nova openstack-nova-conductor-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-compute-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch python-nova-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-cert-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch python-novaclient-3.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch ** Affects: nova Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570241 Title: ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error during type the command: nova virtual-interface-list Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: [stack@undercloud ~]$ nova virtual-interface-list bae94215-cda7-4307-9425-f491f2be2343 ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/ and attach the Nova API log if possible. (HTTP 500) (Request-ID: req-2dc1eff6-874c-4a7c-b731-a56a6b9796fb) [stack@undercloud ~]$ rpm -qa |grep -i nova openstack-nova-conductor-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-compute-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-scheduler-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-api-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch python-nova-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-cert-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-nova-common-12.0.2-5.el7ost.noarch python-novaclient-3.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1570241/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1421239] Re: LBaaS- overwrite when associate 2 different Vip's to same external IP
** Changed in: neutron Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Changed in: neutron Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1421239 Title: LBaaS- overwrite when associate 2 different Vip's to same external IP Status in neutron: New Bug description: Version : [root@puma15 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.9-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch I created in LBaaS 2 VIP's . I associate one vip (192.168.1.8) to external IP (10.35.166.4). When I try to associate the second vip(192.168.1.9) to same external IP 10.35.166.4 I success but it overwrite the first vip , there is no warning message. We should prevent it as we cannot associate VM to external IP that already associated to other VM (we get an error message : Conflict (HTTP 409) (Request-ID: req-35eeddc9-d264-4fc5-a336-d201e4a66231 ]) **If we not prevent it we should send warning message about it . How to Reproduce : Create in your tenant 2 VM's with internal network & external network. 1. Create LB pool on subnet of tenant A > 2. Log into VM1 and VM2, enable httpd 3. Create 2 members into webpool (use VM’s Ips) --protocol-port 80 webpool> 4.Create a Healthmonitor and associated it with the webpool Run: webpool 5.Create a VIP for the webpool webpool> 6.Check HAproxy created (for example) 7. Create a floating IP from external network 8.Check port id of LB VIP 9.Associate floating IP with the LB VIP 10.From external network, try to connect the floating IP by curl http://IP> create for same VM's VIP to other service FTP or SSH for example and try to associate it to same external floating ip that we used already. see the command I entered : __ [root@puma15 ~(keystone_eran1)]# neutron port-list +--+--+---+-+ | id | name | mac_address | fixed_ips | +--+--+---+-+ | 17552712-9b66-466b-8836-7e09a15f439a | | fa:16:3e:6d:93:c3 | {"subnet_id": "cff1967c-dd18-4247-849d-97c363c39b4f", "ip_address": "10.35.166.5"} | | 2668a4e8-7ddf-4242-813b-5febe7269d1b | | fa:16:3e:9d:d0:cd | {"subnet_id": "c86dbc71-78f8-47a6-9531-fd84a78c5fed", "ip_address": "192.168.1.3"} | | 3f9691df-9e33-4ea2-812a-83d51fdf45a1 | | fa:16:3e:12:18:fb | {"subnet_id": "c86dbc71-78f8-47a6-9531-fd84a78c5fed", "ip_address": "192.168.1.6"} | | 4004c3d0-390a-4db6-9c2c-b96b4a920af8 | | fa:16:3e:df:08:6f | {"subnet_id": "c86dbc71-78f8-47a6-9531-fd84a78c5fed", "ip_address": "192.168.1.1"} | | 460dafb7-3d05-4494-a83d-416b82b4eace | vip-adc9c688-97d2-425b-abd0-29505ac10a76 | fa:16:3e:65:8d:ff | {"subnet_id": "c86dbc71-78f8-47a6-9531-fd84a78c5fed", "ip_address": "192.168.1.56"} | | 6eba1c27-d202-470b-b89b-73a569d9da00 | | fa:16:3e:4d:b9:18 | {"subnet_id": "c86dbc71-78f8-47a6-9531-fd84a78c5fed", "ip_address": "192.168.1.7"} | | 73149116-32e8-4960-a0a5-286bdb117d96 | vip-bc9c9025-db2c-40cd-8663-50c687639ff1 | fa:16:3e:75:53:33 | {"subnet_id": "c86dbc71-78f8-47a6-9531-fd84a78c5fed", "ip_address": "192.168.1.55"} | | 8f6ba5ab-12d8-4b1c-b78f-60bf90210dc9 | | fa:16:3e:ee:a7:a3 | {"subnet_id": "65bfd326-7912-4ce6-91fd-04d81476d20e", "ip_address": "192.168.2.4"} | | aad2870a-4f18-4471-985f-943911dfaaf3 | | fa:16:3e:d9:d7:85 | {"subnet_id": "65bfd326-7912-4ce6-91fd-04d81476d20e", "ip_address": "192.168.2.3"} | | b359ba1f-dde1-4576-9904-644acb032c4f | | fa:16:3e:92:d9:8c | {"subnet_id": "cff1967c-dd18-4247-849d-97c363c39b4f", "ip_address": "10.35.166.4"} | | b471ddb4-d1b8-4df0-b098-60a2a45a1d4f | | fa:16:3e:8c:5b:4c | {"subnet_id": "65bfd326-7912-4ce6-91fd-04d81476d20e", "ip_address": "192.168.2.1"} | | c0fe10e3-32b8-4373-b848-8d9ba5879a41 | | fa:16:
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1567334] [NEW] RFE: Add ethertype field when creating security group rule
Public bug reported: In CLI when creating security group rule there is separation between IPv4 & IPv6 type . I would like to add in Horizon this option so we have separation between IPv4 & IPv6 rules . In cli: neutron security-group-rule-create --direction ingress --ethertype IPv6 Version: Liberty ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567334 Title: RFE: Add ethertype field when creating security group rule Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: In CLI when creating security group rule there is separation between IPv4 & IPv6 type . I would like to add in Horizon this option so we have separation between IPv4 & IPv6 rules . In cli: neutron security-group-rule-create --direction ingress --ethertype IPv6 Version: Liberty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1567334/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1565682] [NEW] OVS-DPDK failed to boot more than 1 instance on OVS-DPDK setup
Public bug reported: vm failed Description of problem: On OVS-DPDK setup 1 controller & 1 compute with data tenant/network type vlan I failed to boot instances. When create 1 VM it success. From the second vm all vm's failed .When I created multiplae VM's - Instance Count 4 for example few of the instances will boot as active and few will be failed. When using DPDK we should boot vm with flavor that use hugepages - : $ nova flavor-create m1.medium_dpdk 6 2048 20 2 $ nova flavor-key m1.medium_dpdk set "hw:mem_page_size=large" attached all log nic type: Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet 10G 2P X520 Adapter driver: ixgbe Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@puma48 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutro openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch [root@puma48 ~]# rpm -qa |grep dpd openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K_ku6_08ooq46dFLiE7fAJ0ByFdPCb0W_q6kKqF3Y0o/edit 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: ** Affects: nova Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "nova dpdk" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565682/+attachment/4622775/+files/nova%20dpdk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565682 Title: OVS-DPDK failed to boot more than 1 instance on OVS-DPDK setup Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: vm failed Description of problem: On OVS-DPDK setup 1 controller & 1 compute with data tenant/network type vlan I failed to boot instances. When create 1 VM it success. From the second vm all vm's failed .When I created multiplae VM's - Instance Count 4 for example few of the instances will boot as active and few will be failed. When using DPDK we should boot vm with flavor that use hugepages - : $ nova flavor-create m1.medium_dpdk 6 2048 20 2 $ nova flavor-key m1.medium_dpdk set "hw:mem_page_size=large" attached all log nic type: Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet 10G 2P X520 Adapter driver: ixgbe Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@puma48 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutro openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.1-6.el7ost.noarch [root@puma48 ~]# rpm -qa |grep dpd openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K_ku6_08ooq46dFLiE7fAJ0ByFdPCb0W_q6kKqF3Y0o/edit 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1565682/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1530038] [NEW] when external_network_bridge is set to br-ex ovs does not create flow to EXT access
Public bug reported: Under /etc/neutron/l3_agent.ini when configuring external_network_bridge = br-ex OVS does not create dump-flow for this vlan so we get external access. version : # rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma06 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep openvswitch python-openvswitch-2.4.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openvswitch-2.4.0-1.el7.x86_64 Installed by packstack OSP-8 step to reproduce : 1. Deploy with packstack OSP-8 , set ETX bridge parameter --> CONFIG_NEUTRON_L3_EXT_BRIDGE= br-ex 2. setup ENV : # neutron net-create external_network --provider:network_type=vlan --provider:segmentation_id=181 --provider:physical_network physnet --router:external # neutron subnet-create external_network 10.35.166.0/24 --disable-dhcp --gateway 10.35.166.254 --allocation-pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.100 # neutron net-create int_net # neutron subnet-create int_net 192.168.1.0/24 --dns_nameservers list=true 10.35.28.28 --name int_sub # neutron router-create Router_eNet # neutron router-interface-add Router_eNet subnet=int_sub # neutron router-gateway-set Router_eNet external_network 3. ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-ex NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=57707.344s, table=0, n_packets=21, n_bytes=1638, idle_age=60, priority=2,in_port=2 actions=drop cookie=0x0, duration=57707.394s, table=0, n_packets=1233857, n_bytes=85172234, idle_age=0, priority=0 actions=NORMAL try to ping EXT network (8.8.8.8) -- no connectivity 4. When we change external_network_bridge = provider and creating the ENV again (new router & new routr ports ) I get EXT access and the flow created : # ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-ex NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=105.955s, table=0, n_packets=5, n_bytes=402, idle_age=97, priority=4,in_port=2,dl_vlan=2 actions=mod_vlan_vid:181,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=58222.490s, table=0, n_packets=39, n_bytes=3174, idle_age=105, priority=2,in_port=2 actions=drop cookie=0x0, duration=58222.540s, table=0, n_packets=1244856, n_bytes=85931346, idle_age=0, priority=0 actions=NORMAL ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530038 Title: when external_network_bridge is set to br-ex ovs does not create flow to EXT access Status in neutron: New Bug description: Under /etc/neutron/l3_agent.ini when configuring external_network_bridge = br-ex OVS does not create dump-flow for this vlan so we get external access. version : # rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma06 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep openvswitch python-openvswitch-2.4.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.1-2.el7ost.noarch openvswitch-2.4.0-1.el7.x86_64 Installed by packstack OSP-8 step to reproduce : 1. Deploy with packstack OSP-8 , set ETX bridge parameter --> CONFIG_NEUTRON_L3_EXT_BRIDGE= br-ex 2. setup ENV : # neutron net-create external_network --provider:network_type=vlan --provider:segmentation_id=181 --provider:physical_network physnet --router:external # neutron subnet-create external_network 10.35.166.0/24 --disable-dhcp --gateway 10.35.166.254 --allocation-pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.100 # neutron net-create int_net # neutron subnet-create int_net 192.168.1.0/24 --dns_nameservers list=true 10.35.28.28 --name int_sub # neutron router-create Router_eNet # neutron router-interface-add Router_eNet subnet=int_sub # neutron router-gateway-set Router_eNet external_network 3. ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-ex NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=57707.344s, table=0, n_packets=21, n_bytes=1638, idle_age=60, priority=2,in_port=2 actions=drop cookie=0x0, duration=57707.394s, table=0, n_packets=1233857, n_bytes=85172234, idle_age=0, priority=0 actions=NORMAL try to ping EXT network (8.8.8.8) -- no connectivity 4. When we change external_network_bridge = provider and creating the ENV again (new router & new routr ports ) I get EXT access and the flow created : # ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-ex NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=105.955s, table=0, n_packets=5, n_bytes=402, idle_age=97, priority=4,in_port=2,dl_vlan=2 actions=mod_vlan_vid:181,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=58222.490s, table=0, n_packets=39, n_bytes=3174, idle_age=105, p
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1525796] Re: After OVS-DPDK package installation host responds very slowly
** Changed in: neutron Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525796 Title: After OVS-DPDK package installation host responds very slowly Status in neutron: Invalid Bug description: Description of problem: Install OVS-DPDK packages dpdk-tools-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 After that every command or action taking too long. THe host response very slowly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dpdk-tools-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 [root@puma06 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install OSP-8 ENV with packstack {AIO ENV} 2.install ovs-DPDK packages 3.your user experience now is very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1525796/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1525796] [NEW] After OVS-DPDK package installation host responds very slowly
Public bug reported: Description of problem: Install OVS-DPDK packages dpdk-tools-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 After that every command or action taking too long. THe host response very slowly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dpdk-tools-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 [root@puma06 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install OSP-8 ENV with packstack {AIO ENV} 2.install ovs-DPDK packages 3.your user experience now is very slow ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "DPDK resourches" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525796/+attachment/4534439/+files/DPDK%20resourches -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525796 Title: After OVS-DPDK package installation host responds very slowly Status in neutron: New Bug description: Description of problem: Install OVS-DPDK packages dpdk-tools-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 After that every command or action taking too long. THe host response very slowly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dpdk-tools-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 openvswitch-dpdk-2.4.0-0.10346.git97bab959.2.el7.x86_64 dpdk-2.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 [root@puma06 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0-5.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install OSP-8 ENV with packstack {AIO ENV} 2.install ovs-DPDK packages 3.your user experience now is very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1525796/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1515597] [NEW] OSP-8- neutron-server service in failed status after reboot
Public bug reported: In OSP-8-liberty I deployed environment with 2 nodes controller & compute all services was active . when I reboot the controller neutron-server & l3-agent services upload with "failed" status. The bug found in version : # rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma06 ~]# rpm -qa |grep sql python-sqlalchemy-1.0.8-1.el7ost.x86_64 python-sqlparse-0.1.16-1.1.el7ost.noarch sqlite-3.7.17-8.el7.x86_64 ^[[A[root@puma06 ~]# rpm -qa |grep packstack openstack-packstack-puppet-7.0.0-0.7.dev1661.gaf13b7e.el7ost.noarch openstack-packstack-7.0.0-0.7.dev1661.gaf13b7e.el7ost.noarch try to check if it is SeLinux issue but its not . attached all relevant logs ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "neutron serverlog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515597/+attachment/4517522/+files/neutron%20serverlog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515597 Title: OSP-8- neutron-server service in failed status after reboot Status in neutron: New Bug description: In OSP-8-liberty I deployed environment with 2 nodes controller & compute all services was active . when I reboot the controller neutron-server & l3-agent services upload with "failed" status. The bug found in version : # rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-3.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma06 ~]# rpm -qa |grep sql python-sqlalchemy-1.0.8-1.el7ost.x86_64 python-sqlparse-0.1.16-1.1.el7ost.noarch sqlite-3.7.17-8.el7.x86_64 ^[[A[root@puma06 ~]# rpm -qa |grep packstack openstack-packstack-puppet-7.0.0-0.7.dev1661.gaf13b7e.el7ost.noarch openstack-packstack-7.0.0-0.7.dev1661.gaf13b7e.el7ost.noarch try to check if it is SeLinux issue but its not . attached all relevant logs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1515597/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1512969] [NEW] DHCP-HA-RFE- there is no command that show us with network node is the DHCP proviider
Public bug reported: version : [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.1-dev1.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch When deploying HA environment we have HA of DHCP service . There is no command that gave us information about which network node is provide the DHCP service. The only way to get this info is by search in /var/log/messages which network node sent ack for DHCP request. I think that we need to add neutron command that show which network node is providing DHCP services. for example $ neutron dhcp-show ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512969 Title: DHCP-HA-RFE- there is no command that show us with network node is the DHCP proviider Status in neutron: New Bug description: version : [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.1-dev1.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch When deploying HA environment we have HA of DHCP service . There is no command that gave us information about which network node is provide the DHCP service. The only way to get this info is by search in /var/log/messages which network node sent ack for DHCP request. I think that we need to add neutron command that show which network node is providing DHCP services. for example $ neutron dhcp-show To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1512969/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1504942] [NEW] no support for rbac in horizon
Public bug reported: we need to add support for rbac feature support in horizon- GUI http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/rbac-networks.html bug in version : http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/rbac-networks.html ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504942 Title: no support for rbac in horizon Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: we need to add support for rbac feature support in horizon- GUI http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/rbac-networks.html bug in version : http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/rbac-networks.html To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1504942/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1504941] [NEW] RBAC-RFE- neutron net-show command should display all tenant that using the network
Public bug reported: On rdo- liberty I thested neutron rbac feature . when network assigned to more then 1 tenant we still see one tenant in neutron net-show [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron net-show 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc +---+--+ | Field | Value| +---+--+ | admin_state_up| True | | id| 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | | mtu | 0| | name | internal_ipv4_a | | provider:network_type | vxlan| | provider:physical_network | | | provider:segmentation_id | 70 | | router:external | False| | shared| False| | status| ACTIVE | | subnets | 9a1a387e-88cf-484a-8b12-5a1834be0233 | | tenant_id | fa4add4659704239b771b0bccb8b6829 | +---+--+ this network shared in 2 tenants : [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron rbac-list +--+--+ | id | object_id| +--+--+ | 4f1a9c9d-e820-46e4-b431-b3142c6bb245 | 818dd42f-f627-45d4-a578-dd475b9e19e4 | | 8c995ab1-dea6-411b-854c-a405cf5365fa | 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | | abb375b9-95d0-4297-80f1-3f22f0f84a9e | b071a769-0d50-4d25-8730-fed3dea13a2f | | f3122b92-f47a-4a0f-a422-c9f7ed482341 | 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.1-dev1.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-common-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504941 Title: RBAC-RFE- neutron net-show command should display all tenant that using the network Status in neutron: New Bug description: On rdo- liberty I thested neutron rbac feature . when network assigned to more then 1 tenant we still see one tenant in neutron net-show [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron net-show 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc +---+--+ | Field | Value| +---+--+ | admin_state_up| True | | id| 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | | mtu | 0| | name | internal_ipv4_a | | provider:network_type | vxlan| | provider:physical_network | | | provider:segmentation_id | 70 | | router:external | False| | shared| False| | status| ACTIVE | | subnets | 9a1a387e-88cf-484a-8b12-5a1834be0233 | | tenant_id | fa4add4659704239b771b0bccb8b6829 | +---+--+ this network shared in 2 tenants : [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron rbac-list +--+--+ | id | object_id | +--+--+ | 4f1a9c9d-e820-46e4-b431-b3142c6bb245 | 818dd42f-f627-45d4-a578-dd475b9e19e4 | | 8c995ab1-dea6-411b-854c-a405cf5365fa | 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | | abb375b9-95d0-4297-80f1-3f22f0f84a9e | b071a769-0d50-4d25-8730-fed3dea13a2f | | f3122b92-f47a-4a0f-a422-c9f7ed482341 | 590ca7b9-1682-4c40-8213-02feaa7a96cc | [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-3.1.1-dev1.el7.centos.noarch python-neutron-7.0.0.0-rc2.dev21.el7.centos.noarch ope
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1490985] [NEW] Inconsistent between subnet-create & subnet-update command
Public bug reported: Description of problem: When creating subnet with allocation pool we using flag that calls : " --allocation-pool" the full command : $ neutron subnet-create external_network 10.35.166.0/24 --disable-dhcp --gateway 10.35.166.254 --allocation-pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.100 When we want to update the subnet we need to use this flags : --allocation-pools type=dict list=true start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.55 the full command is : [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pools type=dict list=true start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.55 Updated subnet: c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.4-3.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install OSP 5 on RHEL 7.1 2.run the command : neutron net-create external_network --provider:network_type=vlan --provider:segmentation_id=181 --provider:physical_network physnet --router:external 3.run the command : neutron subnet-create external_network 10.35.166.0/24 --disable-dhcp --gateway 10.35.166.254 --allocation-pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.100 4. neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.90 Unrecognized attribute(s) 'allocation_pool' Actual results: 5.neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pools start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.90 Invalid input for allocation_pools. Reason: Invalid data format for IP pool: 'start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.90'. Expected results: the command in step 4 should work. Additional info: the command that work is : neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pools type=dict list=true start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.55 Updated subnet: c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490985 Title: Inconsistent between subnet-create & subnet-update command Status in neutron: New Bug description: Description of problem: When creating subnet with allocation pool we using flag that calls : " --allocation-pool" the full command : $ neutron subnet-create external_network 10.35.166.0/24 --disable-dhcp --gateway 10.35.166.254 --allocation-pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.100 When we want to update the subnet we need to use this flags : --allocation-pools type=dict list=true start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.55 the full command is : [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pools type=dict list=true start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.55 Updated subnet: c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@cougar16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.4-3.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.1.5-2.el7ost.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install OSP 5 on RHEL 7.1 2.run the command : neutron net-create external_network --provider:network_type=vlan --provider:segmentation_id=181 --provider:physical_network physnet --router:external 3.run the command : neutron subnet-create external_network 10.35.166.0/24 --disable-dhcp --gateway 10.35.166.254 --allocation- pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.100 4. neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pool start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.90 Unrecognized attribute(s) 'allocation_pool' Actual results: 5.neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pools start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.90 Invalid input for allocation_pools. Reason: Invalid data format for IP pool: 'start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.90'. Expected results: the command in step 4 should work. Additional info: the command that work is : neutron subnet-update c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa --allocation-pools type=dict list=true start=10.35.166.1,end=10.35.166.55 Updated subnet: c609b9ce-18d7-4b44-b8e0-5354a7b92caa To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1490985/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : htt
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1477097] [NEW] fwaas: firewall in error status after update firewall-rule
Public bug reported: [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron firewall-show c9478714-20e3-4163-97ad-212cdac04434 ++--+ | Field | Value| ++--+ | admin_state_up | True | | description| | | firewall_policy_id | 48f5dba2-a252-4783-858e-b5ea61f8eb6e | | id | c9478714-20e3-4163-97ad-212cdac04434 | | name | | | router_ids | 9143a9b9-d5ff-4555-8961-6d6649f95226 | | status | ACTIVE | | tenant_id | ffa0f8d8d51849a4ab67651e4bebcbba | ++--+ [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron firewall-rule-update usage: neutron firewall-rule-update [-h] [--request-format {json,xml}] [--protocol {tcp,udp,icmp,any}] FIREWALL_RULE neutron firewall-rule-update: error: too few arguments [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron firewall-rule-update 28767fca-cdcc-4bff-bcde-025b7d5c2411--action deny Invalid values_specs deny [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron firewall-rule-update 28767fca-cdcc-4bff-bcde-025b7d5c2411 --action deny Updated firewall_rule: 28767fca-cdcc-4bff-bcde-025b7d5c2411 [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron firewall-show c9478714-20e3-4163-97ad-212cdac04434 ++--+ | Field | Value| ++--+ | admin_state_up | True | | description| | | firewall_policy_id | 48f5dba2-a252-4783-858e-b5ea61f8eb6e | | id | c9478714-20e3-4163-97ad-212cdac04434 | | name | | | router_ids | 9143a9b9-d5ff-4555-8961-6d6649f95226 | | status | ERROR| | tenant_id | ffa0f8d8d51849a4ab67651e4bebcbba | ++--+ [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep openstack-packstack openstack-packstack-puppet-2015.1-0.11.dev1589.g1d6372f.el7ost.noarch openstack-packstack-2015.1-0.11.dev1589.g1d6372f.el7ost.noarch [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep openstack-puppet-modules openstack-puppet-modules-2015.1.8-8.el7ost.noarch [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-12.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-12.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-12.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.4.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-12.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-12.el7ost.noarch l3-agent log : 2015-07-22 13:42:01.804 8908 INFO neutron.callbacks.manager [req-e57bf79f-416f-48b6-9a23-ed01bf6b2846 ] Notify callbacks for router, after_create 2015-07-22 13:42:01.805 8908 INFO neutron.callbacks.manager [req-e57bf79f-416f-48b6-9a23-ed01bf6b2846 ] Calling callback neutron.agent.metadata.driver.after_router_added 2015-07-22 13:42:03.025 8908 INFO neutron.callbacks.manager [req-e57bf79f-416f-48b6-9a23-ed01bf6b2846 ] Notify callbacks for router, before_update 2015-07-22 13:42:03.593 8908 INFO neutron.callbacks.manager [req-e57bf79f-416f-48b6-9a23-ed01bf6b2846 ] Notify callbacks for router, after_update 2015-07-22 13:48:50.478 8908 INFO neutron.callbacks.manager [-] Notify callbacks for router, before_update 2015-07-22 13:48:50.941 8908 INFO neutron.callbacks.manager [-] Notify callbacks for router, after_update neutron-server.log : 2015-07-22 14:22:05.834 9105 INFO neutron.wsgi [-] (9105) accepted ('10.35.160.41', 49128) 2015-07-22 14:22:05.918 9105 INFO neutron.wsgi [req-cf14cbb2-4c81-4e4f-93e1-3b8f0c829241 ] 10.35.160.41 - - [22/Jul/2015 14:22:05] "GET /v2.0/fw/firewall_rules.json?fields=id&id=28767fca-cdcc-4bff-bcde-025b7d5c2411 HTTP/1.1" 200 281 0.082675 2015-07-22 14:22:06.002 9116 INFO neutron.wsgi [req-2d500a7a-79d8-4915-8c16-58f681ac0dad ] 10.35.160.41 - - [22/Jul/2015 14:22:06] "GET /v2.0/ports.json?device_id=22306c02-13e9-44cb-a69a-790f2797e380&device_id=047af1bb-07a8-4720-ac7b-dcf5ff9ca049 HTTP/1.1" 200 1714 0.102604 2015-07-22 14:22:06.008 9105 INFO neutron.wsgi [req-1129feb4-ebb7-48fe-8e5d-99bd4b6aedd7 ] 10.35.160.41 - - [22/Jul/2015 14:22:06] "PUT /v2.0/fw/firewall_rules/28767fca-cdcc-4bff-bcde-025b7d5c2411.json HTTP/1.1" 200 632 0.086929 2015-07-22 14:22:06.026 9116 INFO neutron.wsgi [req-180227d6-8160-48dd-ad3d-e48d0e4d4049 ] 10.35.160.41 - - [22/Jul/2015 14:22:06] "GET /v2.0/security-groups.json?id
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1476674] [NEW] During image update metadata Danger: There was an error submitting the form. Please try again.
Public bug reported: Log in to horizon as Admin user Navigate to image in admin Tab create image and then type on " update metadata" we get error : Danger: There was an error submitting the form. Please try again. In log file of horizon : 2015-07-21 13:35:14,607 28006 ERROR django.request Internal Server Error: /dashboard/admin/images/06b7c500-768c-4c17-abbe-7a5258674cd2/update_metadata/ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 132, in get_response response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 36, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 84, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 52, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 36, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 84, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/base.py", line 71, in view return self.dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/base.py", line 89, in dispatch return handler(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/edit.py", line 215, in post return self.form_valid(form) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/forms/views.py", line 173, in form_valid exceptions.handle(self.request) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/exceptions.py", line 364, in handle six.reraise(exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/forms/views.py", line 170, in form_valid handled = form.handle(self.request, form.cleaned_data) File "/usr/share/openstack-dashboard/openstack_dashboard/wsgi/../../openstack_dashboard/dashboards/admin/images/forms.py", line 65, in handle _('Unable to update the image metadata.')) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/exceptions.py", line 364, in handle six.reraise(exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback) File "/usr/share/openstack-dashboard/openstack_dashboard/wsgi/../../openstack_dashboard/dashboards/admin/images/forms.py", line 48, in handle new_metadata = json.loads(self.data['metadata']) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/json/__init__.py", line 338, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/json/decoder.py", line 365, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/json/decoder.py", line 383, in raw_decode raise ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded") ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded version : [root@puma16 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep horizon python-django-horizon-2015.1.0-10.el7ost.noarch ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1476674 Title: During image update metadata Danger: There was an error submitting the form. Please try again. Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: Log in to horizon as Admin user Navigate to image in admin Tab create image and then type on " update metadata" we get error : Danger: There was an error submitting the form. Please try again. In log file of horizon : 2015-07-21 13:35:14,607 28006 ERROR django.request Internal Server Error: /dashboard/admin/images/06b7c500-768c-4c17-abbe-7a5258674cd2/update_metadata/ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 132, in get_response response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 36, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 84, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 52, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 36, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/horizon/decorators.py", line 84, in dec return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/views/generic/base.py", line 71, in view return self.dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1465513] [NEW] VM get incorrect default gateway when attached port DG manually to router
Public bug reported: When I create neutron port and attach it to router as "default gateway" and launch VM I can see that VM get ip address of default gateway that not match to ip address of neutron router port. It get the ip gateway from subnet configuration which is x.y.z.1 Version: OSP 7 on rhel 7.1 # rpm -qa |grep dnsmasq dnsmasq-utils-2.67-1.fc20.x86_64 dnsmasq-2.67-1.fc20.x86_64 [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.4.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch step to reproduce : 1. Create a neutron tenant network. 2. Create an IPv4 subnet for the network (say 192.168.1.0/24 with gateway_ip as 192.168.1.1) 3. Create a neutron router (say router1). 4. Create a port on the tenant network (without specifying any fixed_ip). The port would be allocated a free IP from the allocation pool (i.e., say 192.168.1.3). 5. Now attach this port to the neutron router (i.e., neutron router-interface-add ) 6. Spawn some VMs with the above network. Observations: VMs would acquire IP address (something like 192.168.1.4) with a default gateway as 192.168.1.1 and not the ip 192.168.1.3 (i.e., ip of the port which is attached to the neutron router) ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1465513 Title: VM get incorrect default gateway when attached port DG manually to router Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: When I create neutron port and attach it to router as "default gateway" and launch VM I can see that VM get ip address of default gateway that not match to ip address of neutron router port. It get the ip gateway from subnet configuration which is x.y.z.1 Version: OSP 7 on rhel 7.1 # rpm -qa |grep dnsmasq dnsmasq-utils-2.67-1.fc20.x86_64 dnsmasq-2.67-1.fc20.x86_64 [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.4.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-3.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch step to reproduce : 1. Create a neutron tenant network. 2. Create an IPv4 subnet for the network (say 192.168.1.0/24 with gateway_ip as 192.168.1.1) 3. Create a neutron router (say router1). 4. Create a port on the tenant network (without specifying any fixed_ip). The port would be allocated a free IP from the allocation pool (i.e., say 192.168.1.3). 5. Now attach this port to the neutron router (i.e., neutron router-interface-add ) 6. Spawn some VMs with the above network. Observations: VMs would acquire IP address (something like 192.168.1.4) with a default gateway as 192.168.1.1 and not the ip 192.168.1.3 (i.e., ip of the port which is attached to the neutron router) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1465513/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1456206] [NEW] Instance is not assigned with an IP address (Version 4 or 6) when the network attached to it have two subnets - IPv4 and IPv6 (IPv6 can be stateful or stateless)
Public bug reported: When create network with multiple subnets one IPv4 subnet & second IPv6-stateful or IPv6 stateless Instances that assign to this network does not get 2 IP address (IPv4&6). Reproduce all the time , sometime instance get only one IP address IPv4 or IPv6 . version : OSP 7 on rhel 7.1 # rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_redhatadmin)]# rpm -qa |grep dnsmasq dnsmasq-2.66-13.el7_1.x86_64 dnsmasq-utils-2.66-13.el7_1.x86_64 step to reproduce : 1.Create network #neutron net-create internal_ipv4_6 --shared 2.. Create 2 subnets and assign to the network # neutron subnet-create < internal_ipv4_6_id> 192.168.1.0/24 --name internal_ipv4_subnet # neutron subnet-create < internal_ipv4_6_id> 2001:db2:0::2/64 --name dhcpv6_stateless_subnet --ipv6-ra-mode dhcpv6-stateless --ipv6-address-mode dhcpv6-stateless --ip-version 6 3. Router creation # neutron router-create router # neutron router-interface-add Router # neutron router-interface-add Router 4. launce VM with network that you created . #nova boot --flavor 3 --image VM1 --nic net-id= ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1456206 Title: Instance is not assigned with an IP address (Version 4 or 6) when the network attached to it have two subnets - IPv4 and IPv6 (IPv6 can be stateful or stateless) Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: When create network with multiple subnets one IPv4 subnet & second IPv6-stateful or IPv6 stateless Instances that assign to this network does not get 2 IP address (IPv4&6). Reproduce all the time , sometime instance get only one IP address IPv4 or IPv6 . version : OSP 7 on rhel 7.1 # rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_redhatadmin)]# rpm -qa |grep dnsmasq dnsmasq-2.66-13.el7_1.x86_64 dnsmasq-utils-2.66-13.el7_1.x86_64 step to reproduce : 1.Create network #neutron net-create internal_ipv4_6 --shared 2.. Create 2 subnets and assign to the network # neutron subnet-create < internal_ipv4_6_id> 192.168.1.0/24 --name internal_ipv4_subnet # neutron subnet-create < internal_ipv4_6_id> 2001:db2:0::2/64 --name dhcpv6_stateless_subnet --ipv6-ra-mode dhcpv6-stateless --ipv6-address-mode dhcpv6-stateless --ip-version 6 3. Router creation # neutron router-create router # neutron router-interface-add Router # neutron router-interface-add Router 4. launce VM with network that you created . #nova boot --flavor 3 --image VM1 --nic net-id= To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1456206/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1453671] Re: --port_security_enabled flag does not exist in neutron net/port-create/update help
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453671 Title: --port_security_enabled flag does not exist in neutron net/port- create/update help Status in Python client library for Neutron: New Bug description: When printing help of neutron net-create / neutron net-update / neutron port-create / neutron port-update there is no explanation of new flag : --port_security_enabled. version: # rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch example of help output(It is relevant to all the commands I mentioned up) : # neutron help net-create usage: neutron net-create [-h] [-f {shell,table,value}] [-c COLUMN] [--max-width ] [--prefix PREFIX] [--request-format {json,xml}] [--tenant-id TENANT_ID] [--admin-state-down] [--shared] [--router:external] [--provider:network_type ] [--provider:physical_network ] [--provider:segmentation_id ] NAME Create a network for a given tenant. positional arguments: NAME Name of network to create. optional arguments: -h, --helpshow this help message and exit --request-format {json,xml} The XML or JSON request format. --tenant-id TENANT_ID The owner tenant ID. --admin-state-downSet admin state up to false. --shared Set the network as shared. --router:external Set network as external, it is only available for admin --provider:network_type The physical mechanism by which the virtual network is implemented. --provider:physical_network Name of the physical network over which the virtual network is implemented. --provider:segmentation_id VLAN ID for VLAN networks or tunnel-id for GRE/VXLAN networks. output formatters: output formatter options -f {shell,table,value}, --format {shell,table,value} the output format, defaults to table -c COLUMN, --column COLUMN specify the column(s) to include, can be repeated table formatter: --max-width Maximum display width, 0 to disable shell formatter: a format a UNIX shell can parse (variable="value") --prefix PREFIX add a prefix to all variable names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1453671/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1454148] [NEW] Request Failed after enabled extension_drivers=port_security and network already exist
Public bug reported: When I have environment that already exist (VM , network, routers) and after that I enabling extension_drivers=port_security in /etc/neutron/plugin.ini after I restart neutron services I get " Request Failed: internal server error while processing your request. " when I typing neutron command. in neutron server.log I have those error : attached log file If I remove all environment and that restart neutron service there is no error . when enabling extension_drivers=port_security it should propagate to exist setup. version : ]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "port_Sec" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1454148/+attachment/4396086/+files/port_Sec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1454148 Title: Request Failed after enabled extension_drivers=port_security and network already exist Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: When I have environment that already exist (VM , network, routers) and after that I enabling extension_drivers=port_security in /etc/neutron/plugin.ini after I restart neutron services I get " Request Failed: internal server error while processing your request. " when I typing neutron command. in neutron server.log I have those error : attached log file If I remove all environment and that restart neutron service there is no error . when enabling extension_drivers=port_security it should propagate to exist setup. version : ]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-fwaas-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7ost.noarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1454148/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1453676] [NEW] --port-security-enabled=False/True option does not exist in network creation / update
Public bug reported: According to RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167496 We need to add support of port-security-enabled=False/True when creating and updating network. version : ]# rpm -qa |grep horizon python-django-horizon-2015.1.0-2.el7.noarch this flag relevant to port creation but it related to this bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1432373 ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453676 Title: --port-security-enabled=False/True option does not exist in network creation / update Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: According to RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167496 We need to add support of port-security-enabled=False/True when creating and updating network. version : ]# rpm -qa |grep horizon python-django-horizon-2015.1.0-2.el7.noarch this flag relevant to port creation but it related to this bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1432373 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1453676/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1453671] [NEW] --port_security_enabled flag does not exist in neutron net/port-create/update help
Public bug reported: When printing help of neutron net-create / neutron net-update / neutron port-create / neutron port-update there is no explanation of new flag : --port_security_enabled. version: # rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch example of help output(It is relevant to all the commands I mentioned up) : # neutron help net-create usage: neutron net-create [-h] [-f {shell,table,value}] [-c COLUMN] [--max-width ] [--prefix PREFIX] [--request-format {json,xml}] [--tenant-id TENANT_ID] [--admin-state-down] [--shared] [--router:external] [--provider:network_type ] [--provider:physical_network ] [--provider:segmentation_id ] NAME Create a network for a given tenant. positional arguments: NAME Name of network to create. optional arguments: -h, --helpshow this help message and exit --request-format {json,xml} The XML or JSON request format. --tenant-id TENANT_ID The owner tenant ID. --admin-state-downSet admin state up to false. --shared Set the network as shared. --router:external Set network as external, it is only available for admin --provider:network_type The physical mechanism by which the virtual network is implemented. --provider:physical_network Name of the physical network over which the virtual network is implemented. --provider:segmentation_id VLAN ID for VLAN networks or tunnel-id for GRE/VXLAN networks. output formatters: output formatter options -f {shell,table,value}, --format {shell,table,value} the output format, defaults to table -c COLUMN, --column COLUMN specify the column(s) to include, can be repeated table formatter: --max-width Maximum display width, 0 to disable shell formatter: a format a UNIX shell can parse (variable="value") --prefix PREFIX add a prefix to all variable names ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453671 Title: --port_security_enabled flag does not exist in neutron net/port- create/update help Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: When printing help of neutron net-create / neutron net-update / neutron port-create / neutron port-update there is no explanation of new flag : --port_security_enabled. version: # rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch example of help output(It is relevant to all the commands I mentioned up) : # neutron help net-create usage: neutron net-create [-h] [-f {shell,table,value}] [-c COLUMN] [--max-width ] [--prefix PREFIX] [--request-format {json,xml}] [--tenant-id TENANT_ID] [--admin-state-down] [--shared] [--router:external] [--provider:network_type ] [--provider:physical_network ] [--provider:segmentation_id ] NAME Create a network for a given tenant. positional arguments: NAME Name of network to create. optional arguments: -h, --helpshow this help message and exit --request-format {json,xml} The XML or JSON request format. --tenant-id TENANT_ID The owner tenant ID. --admin-state-downSet admin state up to false. --shared Set the network as shared. --router:external Set network as external, it is only available for admin --provider:network_type The physical mechanism by which the virtual network is
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1453667] [NEW] Changing --port_security_enabled=False in network does not propagated to already existing ports
Public bug reported: According to RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167496 Port that already created from network with --port_security_enabled=True will not updated to False when we update network to --port_security_enabled=False. Version: # rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch enter to plugin.ini and enable port-security extension: [root@puma15]# vi /etc/neutron/plugin.ini extension_drivers=port_security * you have to restart neutron server service : #openstack-service restart neutron-server 1. Create internal network & subnet # neutron net-create int_net # neutron net-show int_net | grep port_security_enabled # neutron subnet-create 192.168.1.0/24 --name ipv4_subnet --ip-version 4 --dns_nameservers list=true 10.35.28.28 2. create neutron router #neutron router-create Router_eNet 3. create interface for internal network in the router #neutron router-interface-add Router_eNet 4. create gateway for the router #neutron router-gateway-set Router_eNet 5. Launch 2 instances 6.#neutron net-update int_net --port-security-enabled=False 7. check the port of exist VM its still in True . ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453667 Title: Changing --port_security_enabled=False in network does not propagated to already existing ports Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: According to RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167496 Port that already created from network with --port_security_enabled=True will not updated to False when we update network to --port_security_enabled=False. Version: # rpm -qa |grep neutron python-neutronclient-2.3.11-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch openstack-neutron-common-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch python-neutron-lbaas-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch enter to plugin.ini and enable port-security extension: [root@puma15]# vi /etc/neutron/plugin.ini extension_drivers=port_security * you have to restart neutron server service : #openstack-service restart neutron-server 1. Create internal network & subnet # neutron net-create int_net # neutron net-show int_net | grep port_security_enabled # neutron subnet-create 192.168.1.0/24 --name ipv4_subnet --ip-version 4 --dns_nameservers list=true 10.35.28.28 2. create neutron router #neutron router-create Router_eNet 3. create interface for internal network in the router #neutron router-interface-add Router_eNet 4. create gateway for the router #neutron router-gateway-set Router_eNet 5. Launch 2 instances 6.#neutron net-update int_net --port-security-enabled=False 7. check the port of exist VM its still in True . To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1453667/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1447004] [NEW] LBaaS- Unclear error message when edit Healthmonitor "delay" value to be smaller than "Timeout"
Public bug reported: When I trying to edit an exist "Healthmonitor" with Delay value to be smailler than timeout value I get unclear error message . reproduce : 1.neutron lb-healthmonitor-create --delay 3 --type HTTP --max-retries 3 --timeout 3 2. try to edit it with delay value lower than timeout value # neutron lb-healthmonitor-list +--+--++ | id | type | admin_state_up | +--+--++ | 6b52d5f0-a1a2-4a37-a3dd-df740277f3a2 | HTTP | True | +--+--++ # neutron lb-healthmonitor-show 6b52d5f0-a1a2-4a37-a3dd-df740277f3a2 ++-+ | Field | Value | ++-+ | admin_state_up | True | | delay | 3 | | expected_codes | 200 | | http_method| GET | | id | 6b52d5f0-a1a2-4a37-a3dd-df740277f3a2 | | max_retries| 3 | | pools | {"status": "ACTIVE", "status_description": null, "pool_id": "8c576c3a-75a0-4579-b908-7060df1ee01c"} | | tenant_id | 597cc04c77ee44eeb7b878f63a24eac9 | | timeout| 3 | | type | HTTP | | url_path | / | ++-+ # neutron lb-healthmonitor-update 6b52d5f0-a1a2-4a37-a3dd-df740277f3a2 --delay 1 Bad Request (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-34ddb573-b0ef-43de-ba92-dc446f612add) ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447004 Title: LBaaS- Unclear error message when edit Healthmonitor "delay" value to be smaller than "Timeout" Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: When I trying to edit an exist "Healthmonitor" with Delay value to be smailler than timeout value I get unclear error message . reproduce : 1.neutron lb-healthmonitor-create --delay 3 --type HTTP --max-retries 3 --timeout 3 2. try to edit it with delay value lower than timeout value # neutron lb-healthmonitor-list +--+--++ | id | type | admin_state_up | +--+--++ | 6b52d5f0-a1a2-4a37-a3dd-df740277f3a2 | HTTP | True | +--+--++ # neutron lb-healthmonitor-show 6b52d5f0-a1a2-4a37-a3dd-df740277f3a2 ++-+ | Field | Value | ++-+ | admin_state_up | True | | delay | 3 | | expected_codes | 200 | | http_method| GET | | id | 6b52d5f0-a1a2-4a37-a3dd-df740277f3a2 | | max_retries| 3
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1446997] [NEW] LBaaS-Healthmonitor -Unclear
Public bug reported: In Horizon under "Load- Balance" --> "Monitors" When I trying to edit an exist "Healthmonitor" there is no clear legend that explain that "Delay"=>"Timeout" When I trying to config Delay to be smailler then timeout value I get unclear error message . 1. Should add legend to explain that "Delay"= >"Timeout" (equal or grater then) 2. Should fix error message when edit "delay" value to be smaller then "Timeout" to be clear attached screen shot ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "lbaas.tar" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446997/+attachment/4381095/+files/lbaas.tar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446997 Title: LBaaS-Healthmonitor -Unclear Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: In Horizon under "Load- Balance" --> "Monitors" When I trying to edit an exist "Healthmonitor" there is no clear legend that explain that "Delay"=>"Timeout" When I trying to config Delay to be smailler then timeout value I get unclear error message . 1. Should add legend to explain that "Delay"= >"Timeout" (equal or grater then) 2. Should fix error message when edit "delay" value to be smaller then "Timeout" to be clear attached screen shot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1446997/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1445004] [NEW] Horizon- there is no option to edit instance for hotplug NIC
Public bug reported: It is not possible in Horizon to edit instances that already launched for adding hotplug NIC . version : openstack Juno , OS rhel 7.1 libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 # rpm -qa |grep horizon python-django-horizon-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch step to reproduce : 1. Connect to OSP via Horizon 2. Create 2 network 3. Launch instance with one hotplug NIC 4. After the instance is running try to edit it to add hotplug NIC --- it is not possible . in Nova it is supported : # nova interface-attach ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445004 Title: Horizon- there is no option to edit instance for hotplug NIC Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: It is not possible in Horizon to edit instances that already launched for adding hotplug NIC . version : openstack Juno , OS rhel 7.1 libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 # rpm -qa |grep horizon python-django-horizon-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch step to reproduce : 1. Connect to OSP via Horizon 2. Create 2 network 3. Launch instance with one hotplug NIC 4. After the instance is running try to edit it to add hotplug NIC --- it is not possible . in Nova it is supported : # nova interface-attach To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1445004/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1429866] [NEW] Horizon does not display ID of Security Group
Public bug reported: Horizon does not display UUID of security group. When I create security group via CLI or Horizon and I want to check the UUID of the security group via Horizon I can see that it does not display . It display only the name of security group . The problem is bigger when I create few security groups with same name (this option is valid) . version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_tenant_a)]# rpm -qa | grep horizon python-django-horizon-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_tenant_a)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 [root@puma15 yum.repos.d(keystone_tenant_a)]# cat rhos-release-6-rhel-7.1.repo # # Release Engineering Builds # [rhelosp-6.0] name=RHOS-6.0 baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/rel-eng/OpenStack/6.0-RHEL-7/latest/RH7-RHOS-6.0/$basearch/os gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 [rhelosp-6.0-debug] name=RHOS-6.0 Debuginfo baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/rel-eng/OpenStack/6.0-RHEL-7/latest/RH7-RHOS-6.0/$basearch/debuginfo gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 [rhelosp-6.0-sources] name=RHOS-6.0 Sources baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/rel-eng/OpenStack/6.0-RHEL-7/latest/RH7-RHOS-6.0/source gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 # # Development builds (poodles) # [rhelosp-6.0-poodle] name=RHOS-6.0 baseurl=http://ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com/poodles/rhos-devel-ci/6.0/latest/RHOS-6/$basearch/os gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 [rhelosp-6.0-poodle-debug] name=RHOS-6.0 Debuginfo baseurl=http://ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com/poodles/rhos-devel-ci/6.0/latest/RHOS-6/$basearch/debuginfo gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 [rhelosp-6.0-poodle-sources] name=RHOS-6.0 Sources baseurl=http://ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com/poodles/rhos-devel-ci/6.0/latest/RHOS-6/source gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 # Flea repo for RHEL-OSP 6 [rhelosp-6.0-flea] name=RHOS-6.0 Flea baseurl=http://ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com/poodles/rhos-devel-ci/6.0/fleas/latest enabled=0 skip_if_unavailable=1 gpgcheck=0 # end substitution # # # Other dependencies # [rhelosp-rhel-7-common] name=RHEL 7 Common baseurl=http://ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com/poodles/rhel-7-common/7.0/latest/RHEL-7-COMMON/$basearch/os/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [rhelosp-rhel-7-server] name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - Server baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/composes/latest-RHEL7/compose/Server/$basearch/os/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [rhelosp-rhel-7-server-opt] name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - Server Optional baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/composes/latest-RHEL7/compose/Server-optional/$basearch/os/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 [rhelosp-rhel-7-ha] name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - HA baseurl=http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/composes/latest-RHEL7/compose/Server/$basearch/os/addons/HighAvailability/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [rhelosp-rhel-7-z] name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - Z-Stream baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/rel-eng/repos/rhel-7.1-z/$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429866 Title: Horizon does not display ID of Security Group Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: Horizon does not display UUID of security group. When I create security group via CLI or Horizon and I want to check the UUID of the security group via Horizon I can see that it does not display . It display only the name of security group . The problem is bigger when I create few security groups with same name (this option is valid) . version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_tenant_a)]# rpm -qa | grep horizon python-django-horizon-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_tenant_a)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 [root@puma15 yum.repos.d(keystone_tenant_a)]# cat rhos-release-6-rhel-7.1.repo # # Release Engineering Builds # [rhelosp-6.0] name=RHOS-6.0 baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/rel-eng/OpenStack/6.0-RHEL-7/latest/RH7-RHOS-6.0/$basearch/os gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 [rhelosp-6.0-debug] name=RHOS-6.0 Debuginfo baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/rel-eng/OpenStack/6.0-RHEL-7/latest/RH7-RHOS-6.0/$basearch/debuginfo gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 [rhelosp-6.0-sources] name=RHOS-6.0 Sources baseurl=http://download.lab.bos.redhat.com/rel-eng/OpenStack/6.0-RHEL-7/latest/RH7-RHOS-6.0/source gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 # # Development builds (poodles) # [rhelosp-6.0-poodle] name=RHOS-6.0 baseurl=http://ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com/poodles/rhos-devel-ci/6.0/latest/RHOS-6/$basearch/os gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 [rhelosp-6.0-poodle-debug] name=RHOS-6.0 Debuginfo baseurl=http://ayanami.boston.devel.redhat.com/poodles/rhos-devel-ci/6.0/latest/RHOS-6/$basearch/debuginfo gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 [rhelosp-6.0-pood
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1423475] [NEW] It is possible to delete default security group via neutron client
Public bug reported: When I enter to horizon (WebUI) with user admin and trying to delete default security group I get an error message that I cannot do this action. When I run same scenario from neutron client by using this commands : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-list +--+-+-+ | id | name| description | +--+-+-+ | 8f7a6756-60e4-45e2-a35a-673bcd9508aa | default | default | +--+-+-+ [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-delete 8f7a6756-60e4-45e2-a35a-673bcd9508aa Deleted security_group: 8f7a6756-60e4-45e2-a35a-673bcd9508aa I can see that the action successful when it should not . After few seconds from delete action I type the command : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-list +--+-+-+ | id | name| description | +--+-+-+ | e56b4c51-5324-405e-bc54-0044247b6b5b | default | default | +--+-+-+ As we can see it generate a new default security group with new ID . Version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep neut python-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.9-1.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/ total 48 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 252 Feb 16 10:13 epel.repo -rw---. 1 root root 24221 Feb 16 10:03 Eran_answer_file.txt -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 358 Feb 16 09:34 redhat.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 165 Feb 16 09:34 rhel-optional.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 153 Feb 16 09:34 rhel-server.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2316 Feb 16 09:44 rhos-release-6-rhel-7.1.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 122 Feb 13 01:06 rhos-release.repo ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423475 Title: It is possible to delete default security group via neutron client Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: When I enter to horizon (WebUI) with user admin and trying to delete default security group I get an error message that I cannot do this action. When I run same scenario from neutron client by using this commands : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-list +--+-+-+ | id | name| description | +--+-+-+ | 8f7a6756-60e4-45e2-a35a-673bcd9508aa | default | default | +--+-+-+ [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-delete 8f7a6756-60e4-45e2-a35a-673bcd9508aa Deleted security_group: 8f7a6756-60e4-45e2-a35a-673bcd9508aa I can see that the action successful when it should not . After few seconds from delete action I type the command : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-list +--+-+-+ | id | name| description | +--+-+-+ | e56b4c51-5324-405e-bc54-0044247b6b5b | default | default | +--+-+-+ As we can see it generate a new default security group with new ID . Version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep neut python-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.9-1.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/ total 48 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 252 Feb 16 10:13 epel.repo -rw---. 1 root root 24221 Feb 16 10:03 Eran_answer_file.txt -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 358 Feb 16 09:34 redhat.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 165 Feb 16 09:34 rhel-optional.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 153 Feb 16 09:34 rhel-server.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2316 Feb 16 09:44 rhos-release-6-rhel-7.1.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 122 Feb 13 01:06 rhos-release.repo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+b
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1423168] [NEW] no error when adding an already-associated security group to a running instance
Public bug reported: I don't get any error message when I try to associate VM to security group when it already assigned to this security group . version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep neu python-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.9-1.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 rhos-release-6-rhel-7.1.repo 1. List the security groups associated with your running instance [root@puma15 neutron(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-list +--+--+--+ | id | name | description | +--+--+--+ | 09600aa9-e220-4a4c-a905-6db9c91d968b | sec_test | will associate to testing VM | | 19dfccd3-2c47-41a7-9227-d0fdc4a7284f | default | default | | ef948932-65e8-4939-b485-6c80bd0b7b9c | default | default | +--+--+--+ [root@puma15 neutron(keystone_admin)]# nova show 29eeb6ab-55d9-421f-b530-a9a2d5f6dc75 |grep security_group | security_groups | default | 2. Create a new security group $ neutron security-group-create test3 --description "will be associated to a testing instance twice" [root@puma15 neutron(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-list +--+-++ | id | name| description | +--+-++ | 19dfccd3-2c47-41a7-9227-d0fdc4a7284f | default | default | | ca017993-79f2-4091-88c5-4b48bf09adaa | test3 | will be associated to a testing instance twice | | ef948932-65e8-4939-b485-6c80bd0b7b9c | default | default | +--+-++ 3. Associate the newly-created security group to the running instance [root@puma15 neutron(keystone_admin)]# nova add-secgroup 29eeb6ab-55d9-421f-b530-a9a2d5f6dc75 test3 4. Try to associate again the same security group to the same instance [root@puma15 neutron(keystone_admin)]# nova add-secgroup 29eeb6ab-55d9-421f-b530-a9a2d5f6dc75 test3 Expected error : ERROR: Security group 16 is already associated with the instance 29fe826e-7ff2-488f-9452-5b2e9bfda8b8 (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-7a216931-c7ec-47b6-a784-ac4b57c648b7) ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423168 Title: no error when adding an already-associated security group to a running instance Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: I don't get any error message when I try to associate VM to security group when it already assigned to this security group . version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep neu python-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.2.2-2.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.9-1.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-21.el7.x86_64 rhos-release-6-rhel-7.1.repo 1. List the security groups associated with your running instance [root@puma15 neutron(keystone_admin)]# neutron security-group-list +--+--+--+ | id | name | description | +--+--+--+ | 09600aa9-e220-4a4c-a905-6db9c91d968b | sec_test | will associate to testing VM | | 19dfccd3-2c47-41a7-9227-d0fdc4a7284f | default | default | | ef948932-65e8-4939-b485-6c80bd0b7b9c | default | default | +--+--+--+ [root@puma15 neutron(keystone_admin)]# nova show 29eeb6ab-55d9-421f-b530-a9a2d5f6dc75 |grep security_group | security_groups | default | 2. Create a new security group $ neutron security-group-create test3 --description "will be associated to a testing instance twice" [root@puma15 neutron(ke
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1423075] [NEW] LBaaS|cannot assign 2 pools of service to same VIP
Public bug reported: Version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-10.el7.x86_64 [root@puma15 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.9-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch When I created 2 pools with 2 different protocol = 1.HTTP & 2. TCP(SSH) I tried to associate it via neutron client (CLI) to same VIP but it not possible. There is no option to create load balancer that make balance between 2 server for 2 different services. To Reproduce : 1. configure 2 different pools 1 for HTTP and second to SSH and assign them to 1 single VIP . As its see I need to create Vip per a service . This behevie is not as I expected LB should be work. we can take for example Alteon- Radware LB or F5 LB . attached setup description . ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: lbaas neutron-core ** Attachment added: "LB-2services.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423075/+attachment/4321561/+files/LB-2services.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423075 Title: LBaaS|cannot assign 2 pools of service to same VIP Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: Version : [root@puma15 ~(keystone_admin)]# rpm -qa | grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-10.el7.x86_64 [root@puma15 ~]# rpm -qa |grep neutron openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutronclient-2.3.9-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch python-neutron-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch openstack-neutron-ml2-2014.2.1-6.el7ost.noarch When I created 2 pools with 2 different protocol = 1.HTTP & 2. TCP(SSH) I tried to associate it via neutron client (CLI) to same VIP but it not possible. There is no option to create load balancer that make balance between 2 server for 2 different services. To Reproduce : 1. configure 2 different pools 1 for HTTP and second to SSH and assign them to 1 single VIP . As its see I need to create Vip per a service . This behevie is not as I expected LB should be work. we can take for example Alteon- Radware LB or F5 LB . attached setup description . To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1423075/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1421239] [NEW] LBaaS- overwrite when associate 2 different Vip's to same external IP
Public bug reported: I created in LBaaS 2 VIP's . I associate one vip (192.168.1.8) to external IP (10.35.166.4). When I try to associate the second vip(192.168.1.9) to same external IP 10.35.166.4 I success but it overwrite the first vip , there is no warning message. We should prevent it as we cannot associate VM to external IP that already associated to other VM (we get an error message : Conflict (HTTP 409) (Request-ID: req-35eeddc9-d264-4fc5-a336-d201e4a66231 ]) **If we not prevent it we should send warning message about it . How to Reproduce : Create in your tenant 2 VM's with internal network & external network. 1. Create LB pool on subnet of tenant A > 2. Log into VM1 and VM2, enable httpd 3. Create 2 members into webpool (use VM’s Ips) --protocol-port 80 webpool> 4.Create a Healthmonitor and associated it with the webpool Run: webpool 5.Create a VIP for the webpool webpool> 6.Check HAproxy created (for example) 7. Create a floating IP from external network 8.Check port id of LB VIP 9.Associate floating IP with the LB VIP 10.From external network, try to connect the floating IP by curl http://IP> create for same VM's VIP to other service FTP or SSH for example and try to associate it to same external floating ip that we used already. ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "LBaaS floating IP .odt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1421239/+attachment/4317992/+files/LBaaS%20floating%20IP%20.odt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1421239 Title: LBaaS- overwrite when associate 2 different Vip's to same external IP Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service): New Bug description: I created in LBaaS 2 VIP's . I associate one vip (192.168.1.8) to external IP (10.35.166.4). When I try to associate the second vip(192.168.1.9) to same external IP 10.35.166.4 I success but it overwrite the first vip , there is no warning message. We should prevent it as we cannot associate VM to external IP that already associated to other VM (we get an error message : Conflict (HTTP 409) (Request-ID: req-35eeddc9-d264-4fc5-a336-d201e4a66231 ]) **If we not prevent it we should send warning message about it . How to Reproduce : Create in your tenant 2 VM's with internal network & external network. 1. Create LB pool on subnet of tenant A > 2. Log into VM1 and VM2, enable httpd 3. Create 2 members into webpool (use VM’s Ips) --protocol-port 80 webpool> 4.Create a Healthmonitor and associated it with the webpool Run: webpool 5.Create a VIP for the webpool webpool> 6.Check HAproxy created (for example) 7. Create a floating IP from external network 8.Check port id of LB VIP 9.Associate floating IP with the LB VIP 10.From external network, try to connect the floating IP by curl http://IP> create for same VM's VIP to other service FTP or SSH for example and try to associate it to same external floating ip that we used already. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1421239/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1420809] Re: Inconsistent beween Horizon & Glance image-create help
** Summary changed: - Glance image-create help in CLI is not correct + Inconsistent beween Horizon & Glance image-create help ** Tags added: horizon ** Project changed: glance => horizon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1420809 Title: Inconsistent beween Horizon & Glance image-create help Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): Opinion Bug description: In Glance CLI help we can see parameter that are written as "optional" when they are mandatory. I compare it with horizon WebUI dashboard and I saw which fields are mandatory . to reproduce the bug in CLI run the command : #glance help image-create compare it with WebUI Version [root@puma15 ~(keystone_eran1)]# rpm -qa |grep glance python-glanceclient-0.14.2-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-glance-2014.2.1-3.el7ost.noarch python-glance-2014.2.1-3.el7ost.noarch python-glance-store-0.1.10-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_eran1)]# rpm -qa |grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-10.el7.x86_64 **Attatched screenshot - describe compare between CLI & WebUI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1420809/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1420809] [NEW] Glance image-create help in CLI is not correct
Public bug reported: In Glance CLI help we can see parameter that are written as "optional" when they are mandatory. I compare it with horizon WebUI dashboard and I saw which fields are mandatory . to reproduce the bug in CLI run the command : #glance help image-create compare it with WebUI Version [root@puma15 ~(keystone_eran1)]# rpm -qa |grep glance python-glanceclient-0.14.2-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-glance-2014.2.1-3.el7ost.noarch python-glance-2014.2.1-3.el7ost.noarch python-glance-store-0.1.10-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_eran1)]# rpm -qa |grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-10.el7.x86_64 **Attatched screenshot - describe compare between CLI & WebUI ** Affects: glance Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "glance_help.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1420809/+attachment/4317165/+files/glance_help.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to Glance. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1420809 Title: Glance image-create help in CLI is not correct Status in OpenStack Image Registry and Delivery Service (Glance): New Bug description: In Glance CLI help we can see parameter that are written as "optional" when they are mandatory. I compare it with horizon WebUI dashboard and I saw which fields are mandatory . to reproduce the bug in CLI run the command : #glance help image-create compare it with WebUI Version [root@puma15 ~(keystone_eran1)]# rpm -qa |grep glance python-glanceclient-0.14.2-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-glance-2014.2.1-3.el7ost.noarch python-glance-2014.2.1-3.el7ost.noarch python-glance-store-0.1.10-2.el7ost.noarch [root@puma15 ~(keystone_eran1)]# rpm -qa |grep rhel libreport-rhel-2.1.11-10.el7.x86_64 **Attatched screenshot - describe compare between CLI & WebUI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1420809/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1419411] [NEW] WishList: add drop-down to filter image & flavor ID
Public bug reported: Version : python-django-horizon-2014.2.1-5.el7ost.noarch Under instances we can filter instances by Image ID / Flavor ID . I think we should add option of drop-down with all image ID & flavor ID instead to go images and check the image ID . ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "filter.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1419411/+attachment/4314673/+files/filter.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1419411 Title: WishList: add drop-down to filter image & flavor ID Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: Version : python-django-horizon-2014.2.1-5.el7ost.noarch Under instances we can filter instances by Image ID / Flavor ID . I think we should add option of drop-down with all image ID & flavor ID instead to go images and check the image ID . To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1419411/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1418452] [NEW] Unnecessary eye icon In Dashboard Horizon Admin --> change password
Public bug reported: When you sign in to dashboard under : Admin --> change password you can see near "Description" - eye icon which is unnecessary , it should be removed . Suggestion: add legend for the blue mark * = which means mandatory field attached screenshot ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "eye icon.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418452/+attachment/4313047/+files/eye%20icon.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418452 Title: Unnecessary eye icon In Dashboard Horizon Admin --> change password Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: When you sign in to dashboard under : Admin --> change password you can see near "Description" - eye icon which is unnecessary , it should be removed . Suggestion: add legend for the blue mark * = which means mandatory field attached screenshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1418452/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1418430] [NEW] Admin-->Setting -->Tool tip of "Item per page" does not include value of max number (1000)
Public bug reported: In Dashboard Horizon go to Admin --> setting Then type on tool tip of "Item per page" You can see it does not include value of the max number which is 1000 items per page. attached video ** Affects: horizon Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Horizon tool tip.webm" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418430/+attachment/4313022/+files/Horizon%20tool%20tip.webm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418430 Title: Admin-->Setting -->Tool tip of "Item per page" does not include value of max number (1000) Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon): New Bug description: In Dashboard Horizon go to Admin --> setting Then type on tool tip of "Item per page" You can see it does not include value of the max number which is 1000 items per page. attached video To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1418430/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp