** Changed in: neutron
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566191
Title:
[RFE] Allow multiple networks with FIP range to be associated with
Tenant router
Status in neutron:
Won't Fix
Bug description:
This requirement came out during Manila-Neutron integration discussion to
provide solution for multi-tenant environment to work with File Share store.
The way to solve it is as following:
A dedicated NAT based network connection should be established between a
tenant's private network (where his VMs reside) and a data center local storage
network. Sticking to IP based authorization, as used by Manila, the NAT
assigned floating IPs in the storage network are used to check authorization in
the storage backend, as well as to deal with possible overlapping IP ranges in
the private networks of different tenants. A dedicated NAT and not the public
FIP is suggested since public FIPs are usually limited resources.
In order to be able to orchestrate the above use case, it should be possible
to associate more than one subnet with 'FIP' range with the router (via router
interface) and enable NAT based on the destination subnet.
This behaviour was possible in Mitaka and worked for MidoNet plugin, but due
to the https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1556884 it won't be possible any
more.
Related bug for security use case that can benefit from the proposed
behavior is described here
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1250105
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1566191/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
