[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17280104#comment-17280104
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10532:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
7s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
16s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 42s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
50s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs
config; considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
48s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 44s{color} |
{color:orange}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/599/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt{color}
| {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 2 new + 305 unchanged - 1 fixed = 307 total (was 306)
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 50s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {co
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Qi Zhu updated YARN-10532: -- Attachment: YARN-10532.018.patch > Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is > not being used > > > Key: YARN-10532 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10532.001.patch, YARN-10532.002.patch, > YARN-10532.003.patch, YARN-10532.004.patch, YARN-10532.005.patch, > YARN-10532.006.patch, YARN-10532.007.patch, YARN-10532.008.patch, > YARN-10532.009.patch, YARN-10532.010.patch, YARN-10532.011.patch, > YARN-10532.012.patch, YARN-10532.013.patch, YARN-10532.014.patch, > YARN-10532.015.patch, YARN-10532.016.patch, YARN-10532.017.patch, > YARN-10532.018.patch > > > It's better if we can delete auto-created queues when they are not in use for > a period of time (like 5 mins). It will be helpful when we have a large > number of auto-created queues (e.g. from 500 users), but only a small subset > of queues are actively used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17280066#comment-17280066
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10532:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 11s{color}
| {color:red}{color} | {color:red} YARN-10532 does not apply to trunk. Rebase
required? Wrong Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for
help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | YARN-10532 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13020113/YARN-10532.017.patch |
| Console output |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/598/console |
| versions | git=2.17.1 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is
> not being used
>
>
> Key: YARN-10532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Wangda Tan
>Assignee: Qi Zhu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10532.001.patch, YARN-10532.002.patch,
> YARN-10532.003.patch, YARN-10532.004.patch, YARN-10532.005.patch,
> YARN-10532.006.patch, YARN-10532.007.patch, YARN-10532.008.patch,
> YARN-10532.009.patch, YARN-10532.010.patch, YARN-10532.011.patch,
> YARN-10532.012.patch, YARN-10532.013.patch, YARN-10532.014.patch,
> YARN-10532.015.patch, YARN-10532.016.patch, YARN-10532.017.patch
>
>
> It's better if we can delete auto-created queues when they are not in use for
> a period of time (like 5 mins). It will be helpful when we have a large
> number of auto-created queues (e.g. from 500 users), but only a small subset
> of queues are actively used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17280065#comment-17280065 ] Qi Zhu commented on YARN-10532: --- Thanks a lot [~gandras] for patient review. In latest patch, I have fixed 1. MonitoringInterval related bug. 2. Queue-expiration-time related bug. 3. Add more reasonable test for TestCapacitySchedulerNewQueueAutoCreation. 4. We can disable all queues auto deletion by set it to -1. But i still think it is needed that we can disable a specific queue when other queues enable auto deletion. The logic now is reasonable. If you any other thoughts? > Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is > not being used > > > Key: YARN-10532 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10532.001.patch, YARN-10532.002.patch, > YARN-10532.003.patch, YARN-10532.004.patch, YARN-10532.005.patch, > YARN-10532.006.patch, YARN-10532.007.patch, YARN-10532.008.patch, > YARN-10532.009.patch, YARN-10532.010.patch, YARN-10532.011.patch, > YARN-10532.012.patch, YARN-10532.013.patch, YARN-10532.014.patch, > YARN-10532.015.patch, YARN-10532.016.patch, YARN-10532.017.patch > > > It's better if we can delete auto-created queues when they are not in use for > a period of time (like 5 mins). It will be helpful when we have a large > number of auto-created queues (e.g. from 500 users), but only a small subset > of queues are actively used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Qi Zhu updated YARN-10532: -- Attachment: YARN-10532.017.patch > Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is > not being used > > > Key: YARN-10532 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10532.001.patch, YARN-10532.002.patch, > YARN-10532.003.patch, YARN-10532.004.patch, YARN-10532.005.patch, > YARN-10532.006.patch, YARN-10532.007.patch, YARN-10532.008.patch, > YARN-10532.009.patch, YARN-10532.010.patch, YARN-10532.011.patch, > YARN-10532.012.patch, YARN-10532.013.patch, YARN-10532.014.patch, > YARN-10532.015.patch, YARN-10532.016.patch, YARN-10532.017.patch > > > It's better if we can delete auto-created queues when they are not in use for > a period of time (like 5 mins). It will be helpful when we have a large > number of auto-created queues (e.g. from 500 users), but only a small subset > of queues are actively used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10588) Percentage of queue and cluster is zero in WebUI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279997#comment-17279997
]
Jim Brennan commented on YARN-10588:
Thanks for reporting this and putting up the patch [~BilwaST]! I wonder if a
better fix would be to change {{DominantResourceCalculator.isInvalidDivisor()}}
to be consistent with {{DominantResourceCalculator.divide()}}? Currently it
returns true if any resource is zero, while {{divide}} is only going to return
zero if all of the countable ones are zero.
[~epayne] what do you think?
> Percentage of queue and cluster is zero in WebUI
> -
>
> Key: YARN-10588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10588
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10588.001.patch, YARN-10588.002.patch,
> YARN-10588.003.patch
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> Configure below property in resource-types.xml
> {code:java}
>
> yarn.resource-types
> yarn.io/gpu
> {code}
> Submit a job
> In UI you can see % Of Queue and % Of Cluster is zero for the submitted
> application
>
> This is because in SchedulerApplicationAttempt has below check for
> calculating queueUsagePerc and clusterUsagePerc
> {code:java}
> if (!calc.isInvalidDivisor(cluster)) {
> float queueCapacityPerc = queue.getQueueInfo(false, false)
> .getCapacity();
> queueUsagePerc = calc.divide(cluster, usedResourceClone,
> Resources.multiply(cluster, queueCapacityPerc)) * 100;
> if (Float.isNaN(queueUsagePerc) || Float.isInfinite(queueUsagePerc)) {
> queueUsagePerc = 0.0f;
> }
> clusterUsagePerc =
> calc.divide(cluster, usedResourceClone, cluster) * 100;
> }
> {code}
> calc.isInvalidDivisor(cluster) always returns true as gpu resource is 0
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10607) User environment is unable to prepend PATH when mapreduce.admin.user.env also sets PATH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279989#comment-17279989
]
Eric Badger commented on YARN-10607:
Thanks, [~Jim_Brennan] for the review and commit!
> User environment is unable to prepend PATH when mapreduce.admin.user.env also
> sets PATH
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10607
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10607
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Eric Badger
>Assignee: Eric Badger
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.4.0, 3.3.1, 3.2.3
>
> Attachments: YARN-10607.001.patch, YARN-10607.002.patch,
> YARN-10607.003.patch, YARN-10607.004.patch, YARN-10607.004.patch
>
>
> When using the tarball approach to ship relevant Hadoop jars to containers,
> it is helpful to set {{mapreduce.admin.user.env}} to something like
> {{PATH=./hadoop-tarball:\{\{PATH\}\}}} to make sure that all of the Hadoop
> binaries are on the PATH. This way you can call {{hadoop}} instead of
> {{./hadoop-tarball/hadoop}}. The intention here is to force prepend
> {{./hadoop-tarball}} and then append the set {{PATH}} afterwards. But if a
> user would like to override the appended portion of {{PATH}} in their
> environment, they are unable to do so. This is because {{PATH}} ends up
> getting parsed twice. Initially it is set via {{mapreduce.admin.user.env}} to
> {{PATH=./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}}. In this case {{SYS_PATH}} is what I'll
> refer to as the normal system path. E.g. {{/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin}}, etc.
> After this, the user env parsing happens. For example, let's say the user
> sets their {{PATH}} to {{PATH=.:$PATH}}. We have already parsed {{PATH}} from
> the admin.user.env. Then we go to parse the user environment and find the
> user also specified {{PATH}}. So {{$PATH}} ends up getting getting expanded
> to {{./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}, which leads to the user's {{PATH}} being
> {{PATH=.:./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}. We then append this to {{PATH}}, which
> has already been set in the environment map via the admin.user.env. So we
> finally end up with
> {{PATH=./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH:.:./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}.
> This normally isn't a huge deal, but if you want to ship a version of
> python/perl/etc. that clashes with the one that is already there in
> {{SYS_PATH}}, you will need to refer to it by its full path. Since in the
> above example, {{.}} doesn't appear until after {{$SYS_PATH}}. This is a pain
> and it should be possible to prepend its {{PATH}} to override the
> system/container {{SYS_PATH}}, even when also forcefully prepending to
> {{PATH}} with you hadoop tarball.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10559) Fair sharing intra-queue preemption support in Capacity Scheduler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279919#comment-17279919
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10559:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
39s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 24m
36s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
8s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
18m 28s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
46s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 2m
6s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config;
considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
3s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 48s{color} |
{color:orange}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/597/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt{color}
| {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 6 new + 533 unchanged - 0 fixed = 539 total (was 533)
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
20s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 44s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {co
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10607) User environment is unable to prepend PATH when mapreduce.admin.user.env also sets PATH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279810#comment-17279810
]
Jim Brennan commented on YARN-10607:
Thanks for the updates [~ebadger]. +1 This looks good to me.
I will commit today.
> User environment is unable to prepend PATH when mapreduce.admin.user.env also
> sets PATH
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10607
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10607
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Eric Badger
>Assignee: Eric Badger
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10607.001.patch, YARN-10607.002.patch,
> YARN-10607.003.patch, YARN-10607.004.patch, YARN-10607.004.patch
>
>
> When using the tarball approach to ship relevant Hadoop jars to containers,
> it is helpful to set {{mapreduce.admin.user.env}} to something like
> {{PATH=./hadoop-tarball:\{\{PATH\}\}}} to make sure that all of the Hadoop
> binaries are on the PATH. This way you can call {{hadoop}} instead of
> {{./hadoop-tarball/hadoop}}. The intention here is to force prepend
> {{./hadoop-tarball}} and then append the set {{PATH}} afterwards. But if a
> user would like to override the appended portion of {{PATH}} in their
> environment, they are unable to do so. This is because {{PATH}} ends up
> getting parsed twice. Initially it is set via {{mapreduce.admin.user.env}} to
> {{PATH=./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}}. In this case {{SYS_PATH}} is what I'll
> refer to as the normal system path. E.g. {{/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin}}, etc.
> After this, the user env parsing happens. For example, let's say the user
> sets their {{PATH}} to {{PATH=.:$PATH}}. We have already parsed {{PATH}} from
> the admin.user.env. Then we go to parse the user environment and find the
> user also specified {{PATH}}. So {{$PATH}} ends up getting getting expanded
> to {{./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}, which leads to the user's {{PATH}} being
> {{PATH=.:./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}. We then append this to {{PATH}}, which
> has already been set in the environment map via the admin.user.env. So we
> finally end up with
> {{PATH=./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH:.:./hadoop-tarball:$SYS_PATH}}.
> This normally isn't a huge deal, but if you want to ship a version of
> python/perl/etc. that clashes with the one that is already there in
> {{SYS_PATH}}, you will need to refer to it by its full path. Since in the
> above example, {{.}} doesn't appear until after {{$SYS_PATH}}. This is a pain
> and it should be possible to prepend its {{PATH}} to override the
> system/container {{SYS_PATH}}, even when also forcefully prepending to
> {{PATH}} with you hadoop tarball.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10615) Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of short queue name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Szilard Nemeth updated YARN-10615: -- Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 > Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of > short queue name > > > Key: YARN-10615 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: yarn >Reporter: Andras Gyori >Assignee: Andras Gyori >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > Attachments: YARN-10615.001.patch > > > The CSAutoQueueHandler validates the parent hierarchy of a queue path on > creation. The queues are queried by their short name, which might cause > ambiguity (short name of root.a is the same as root.b.a). We need to query > the queues from QueueManager by full queue path. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10615) Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of short queue name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279796#comment-17279796 ] Szilard Nemeth commented on YARN-10615: --- Thanks [~gandras] for working on this, Patch LGTM, committed to trunk. Thanks [~zhuqi] for your review. > Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of > short queue name > > > Key: YARN-10615 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: yarn >Reporter: Andras Gyori >Assignee: Andras Gyori >Priority: Critical > Attachments: YARN-10615.001.patch > > > The CSAutoQueueHandler validates the parent hierarchy of a queue path on > creation. The queues are queried by their short name, which might cause > ambiguity (short name of root.a is the same as root.b.a). We need to query > the queues from QueueManager by full queue path. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279789#comment-17279789 ] Szilard Nemeth commented on YARN-10610: --- Thanks [~zhuqi] for working on this. Latest patch LGTM, committed to trunk. Thanks [~shuzirra] and [~gandras] for the reviews. > Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath > -- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Szilard Nemeth updated YARN-10610: -- Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 > Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath > -- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Szilard Nemeth updated YARN-10610: -- Summary: Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath. (was: Add queuePath to RESTful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.) > Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath. > --- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Szilard Nemeth updated YARN-10610: -- Summary: Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath (was: Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.) > Add queuePath to RESTful API for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath > -- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to RESTful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Szilard Nemeth updated YARN-10610: -- Summary: Add queuePath to RESTful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath. (was: Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.) > Add queuePath to RESTful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath. > --- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10428) Zombie applications in the YARN queue using FAIR + sizebasedweight
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279777#comment-17279777 ] Szilard Nemeth commented on YARN-10428: --- Thanks [~yguang11], [~gandras] for working on this, Latest patch LGTM, committed to trunk. > Zombie applications in the YARN queue using FAIR + sizebasedweight > -- > > Key: YARN-10428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10428 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: capacityscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.8.5 >Reporter: Guang Yang >Assignee: Andras Gyori >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > Attachments: YARN-10428.001.patch, YARN-10428.002.patch, > YARN-10428.003.patch > > > Seeing zombie jobs in the YARN queue that uses FAIR and size based weight > ordering policy . > *Detection:* > The YARN UI shows incorrect number of "Num Schedulable Applications". > *Impact:* > The queue has an upper limit of number of running applications, with zombie > job, it hits the limit even though the number of running applications is far > less than the limit. > *Workaround:* > **Fail-over and restart Resource Manager process. > *Analysis:* > **In the heap dump, we can find the zombie jobs in the `FairOderingPolicy# > schedulableEntities` (see attachment). Take application > "application_1599157165858_29429" for example, it is still in the > `FairOderingPolicy#schedulableEntities` set, however, if we check the log of > resource manager, we can see RM already tried to remove the application: > > ./yarn-yarn-resourcemanager-ip-172-21-153-252.log.2020-09-04-04:2020-09-04 > 04:32:19,730 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.LeafQueue > (ResourceManager Event Processor): Application removed - appId: > application_1599157165858_29429 user: svc_di_data_eng queue: core-data > #user-pending-applications: -3 #user-active-applications: 7 > #queue-pending-applications: 0 #queue-active-applications: 21 > > So it appears RM failed to removed the application from the set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10428) Zombie applications in the YARN queue using FAIR + sizebasedweight
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Szilard Nemeth updated YARN-10428: -- Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 > Zombie applications in the YARN queue using FAIR + sizebasedweight > -- > > Key: YARN-10428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10428 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: capacityscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.8.5 >Reporter: Guang Yang >Assignee: Andras Gyori >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > Attachments: YARN-10428.001.patch, YARN-10428.002.patch, > YARN-10428.003.patch > > > Seeing zombie jobs in the YARN queue that uses FAIR and size based weight > ordering policy . > *Detection:* > The YARN UI shows incorrect number of "Num Schedulable Applications". > *Impact:* > The queue has an upper limit of number of running applications, with zombie > job, it hits the limit even though the number of running applications is far > less than the limit. > *Workaround:* > **Fail-over and restart Resource Manager process. > *Analysis:* > **In the heap dump, we can find the zombie jobs in the `FairOderingPolicy# > schedulableEntities` (see attachment). Take application > "application_1599157165858_29429" for example, it is still in the > `FairOderingPolicy#schedulableEntities` set, however, if we check the log of > resource manager, we can see RM already tried to remove the application: > > ./yarn-yarn-resourcemanager-ip-172-21-153-252.log.2020-09-04-04:2020-09-04 > 04:32:19,730 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.LeafQueue > (ResourceManager Event Processor): Application removed - appId: > application_1599157165858_29429 user: svc_di_data_eng queue: core-data > #user-pending-applications: -3 #user-active-applications: 7 > #queue-pending-applications: 0 #queue-active-applications: 21 > > So it appears RM failed to removed the application from the set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10559) Fair sharing intra-queue preemption support in Capacity Scheduler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] VADAGA ANANYO RAO updated YARN-10559: - Attachment: YARN-10559.0009.patch > Fair sharing intra-queue preemption support in Capacity Scheduler > - > > Key: YARN-10559 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10559 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: capacityscheduler >Affects Versions: 3.1.4 >Reporter: VADAGA ANANYO RAO >Assignee: VADAGA ANANYO RAO >Priority: Major > Attachments: FairOP_preemption-design_doc_v1.pdf, > FairOP_preemption-design_doc_v2.pdf, YARN-10559.0001.patch, > YARN-10559.0002.patch, YARN-10559.0003.patch, YARN-10559.0004.patch, > YARN-10559.0005.patch, YARN-10559.0006.patch, YARN-10559.0007.patch, > YARN-10559.0008.patch, YARN-10559.0009.patch > > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > Usecase: > Due to the way Capacity Scheduler preemption works, If a single user submits > a large application to a queue (using 100% of resources), that job will not > be preempted by future applications from the same user within the same queue. > This implies that the later applications will be forced to wait for > completion of the long running application. This prevents multiple long > running, large, applications from running concurrently. > Support fair sharing among apps while preempting applications from same queue. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279769#comment-17279769
]
Andras Gyori commented on YARN-10532:
-
Hi [~zhuqi] and thanks for addressing the feedbacks. I have tried this feature
on a cluster and did not work flawlessly. My observations are:
* The monitoringInterval is in milisecond, but the configuration value is in
second. This is a critical discrepancy and resulted in RM spamming. This should
be mitigated by:
{code:java}
monitoringInterval =
csConfig.getLong(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.
AUTO_CREATE_CHILD_QUEUE_EXPIRED_TIME,
CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.
DEFAULT_AUTO_CREATE_CHILD_QUEUE_EXPIRED_TIME) * 1000;
{code}
* The queue-expiration-time is not prefixed, thus making the whole property
named auto-queue-creation-v2.queue-expiration-time instead of
yarn.scheduler.capacity.auto-queue-creation-v2.queue-expiration-time.
* There should be a separation of testing, and I would advise to change the
existing auto deletion tests in TestCapacitySchedulerNewQueueAutoCreation not
to invoke the policy itself, but rely only on CapacityScheduler like the
following example:
{code:java}
@Test
public void testCapacitySchedulerAutoQueueDeletion() throws Exception {
startScheduler();
csConf.setBoolean(
YarnConfiguration.RM_SCHEDULER_ENABLE_MONITORS, true);
csConf.set(YarnConfiguration.RM_SCHEDULER_MONITOR_POLICIES,
AutoCreatedQueueDeletionPolicy.class.getCanonicalName());
csConf.setAutoExpiredDeletionTime(2);
cs.reinitialize(csConf, mockRM.getRMContext());
Set policies = new HashSet<>();
policies.add(
AutoCreatedQueueDeletionPolicy.class.getCanonicalName());
Assert.assertTrue(
"No AutoCreatedQueueDeletionPolicy is present in running monitors",
cs.getSchedulingMonitorManager().isSameConfiguredPolicies(policies));
ApplicationAttemptId app = submitApp(cs, USER0,
"a2-auto", "root.a.a1-auto");
Thread.sleep(1000);
AbstractCSQueue a2 = (AbstractCSQueue) cs.getQueue(
"root.a.a1-auto.a2-auto");
Assert.assertNotNull("a2 is not present", a2);
Assert.assertTrue("a2 is not a dynamic queue",
a2.isDynamicQueue());
finishApp(app);
Thread.sleep(2000);
a2 = (AbstractCSQueue) cs.getQueue("root.a.a1-auto.a2-auto");
Assert.assertNull("a2 is not deleted", a2);
Thread.sleep(2000);
AbstractCSQueue a1 = (AbstractCSQueue) cs.getQueue("root.a.a1-auto");
Assert.assertNull("a1 is not deleted", a1);
csConf.setAutoExpiredDeletionTime(2);
cs.reinitialize(csConf, mockRM.getRMContext());
}
{code}
* The policy itself should only be invoked in its own test class, as you have
already done it.
* As I see it, the general way of disabling time sensitive values is to set it
to -1. This way, you would not need to handle two different property.
> Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is
> not being used
>
>
> Key: YARN-10532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Wangda Tan
>Assignee: Qi Zhu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10532.001.patch, YARN-10532.002.patch,
> YARN-10532.003.patch, YARN-10532.004.patch, YARN-10532.005.patch,
> YARN-10532.006.patch, YARN-10532.007.patch, YARN-10532.008.patch,
> YARN-10532.009.patch, YARN-10532.010.patch, YARN-10532.011.patch,
> YARN-10532.012.patch, YARN-10532.013.patch, YARN-10532.014.patch,
> YARN-10532.015.patch, YARN-10532.016.patch
>
>
> It's better if we can delete auto-created queues when they are not in use for
> a period of time (like 5 mins). It will be helpful when we have a large
> number of auto-created queues (e.g. from 500 users), but only a small subset
> of queues are actively used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10615) Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of short queue name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279742#comment-17279742
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10615:
--
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
31s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
40s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
6s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
46s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
54s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
17m 2s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
49s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs
config; considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
47s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 5s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {c
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-10559) Fair sharing intra-queue preemption support in Capacity Scheduler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17276904#comment-17276904
]
VADAGA ANANYO RAO edited comment on YARN-10559 at 2/5/21, 2:29 PM:
---
Hi [~epayne], thank you for your earlier response. We wanted to get your
suggestions on better handling multiple user cases. Currently, we are
considering a formula to calculate FairShare per app like:
{code:java}
foreach user:
if(tq.leafqueue.getUserLimit == 100)
fairSharePerApp = total Queue Capacity / # of apps of that user;
else
fairSharePerApp = UL / # of apps of that user;
{code}
So, according to the above formula, Say we have a scenario with 2 users and
UserLimit = 100%,
User1 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 50%)
* App1 (fairSharePerApp = 50%)
User2 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 50%)
* App2 (fairSharePerApp = 25%)
* App3 (fairSharePerApp = 25%)
Do you see any shortcomings in this formula or can suggest better ways of
handling multiple user issue? I would really appreciate it :)
cc: [~sunilg] [~wangda]
was (Author: ananyo_rao):
Hi [~epayne], thank you for your earlier response. We wanted to get your
suggestions on better handling multiple user cases. Currently, we are
considering a formula to calculate FairShare per app like:
{code:java}
fairSharePerUser = total Queue Capacity / # of users
foreach user:
if(tq.leafqueue.getUserLimit == 100)
fairSharePerApp = fairSharePerUser / # of apps of that user;
else
fairSharePerApp = UL / # of apps of that user;
{code}
So, according to the above formula, Say we have a scenario with 2 users and
UserLimit = 100%,
User1 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 50%)
* App1 (fairSharePerApp = 50%)
User2 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 50%)
* App2 (fairSharePerApp = 25%)
* App3 (fairSharePerApp = 25%)
Do you see any shortcomings in this formula or can suggest better ways of
handling multiple user issue? I would really appreciate it :)
cc: [~sunilg] [~wangda]
> Fair sharing intra-queue preemption support in Capacity Scheduler
> -
>
> Key: YARN-10559
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10559
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: capacityscheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.1.4
>Reporter: VADAGA ANANYO RAO
>Assignee: VADAGA ANANYO RAO
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: FairOP_preemption-design_doc_v1.pdf,
> FairOP_preemption-design_doc_v2.pdf, YARN-10559.0001.patch,
> YARN-10559.0002.patch, YARN-10559.0003.patch, YARN-10559.0004.patch,
> YARN-10559.0005.patch, YARN-10559.0006.patch, YARN-10559.0007.patch,
> YARN-10559.0008.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> Usecase:
> Due to the way Capacity Scheduler preemption works, If a single user submits
> a large application to a queue (using 100% of resources), that job will not
> be preempted by future applications from the same user within the same queue.
> This implies that the later applications will be forced to wait for
> completion of the long running application. This prevents multiple long
> running, large, applications from running concurrently.
> Support fair sharing among apps while preempting applications from same queue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-10559) Fair sharing intra-queue preemption support in Capacity Scheduler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17276904#comment-17276904
]
VADAGA ANANYO RAO edited comment on YARN-10559 at 2/5/21, 2:29 PM:
---
Hi [~epayne], thank you for your earlier response. We wanted to get your
suggestions on better handling multiple user cases. Currently, we are
considering a formula to calculate FairShare per app like:
{code:java}
foreach user:
if(tq.leafqueue.getUserLimit == 100)
fairSharePerApp = total Queue Capacity / # of apps of that user;
else
fairSharePerApp = UL / # of apps of that user;
{code}
So, according to the above formula, Say we have a scenario with 2 users and
UserLimit = 100%,
User1 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 100%)
* App1 (fairSharePerApp = 100%)
User2 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 100%)
* App2 (fairSharePerApp = 50%)
* App3 (fairSharePerApp = 50%)
Do you see any shortcomings in this formula or can suggest better ways of
handling multiple user issue? I would really appreciate it :)
cc: [~sunilg] [~wangda]
was (Author: ananyo_rao):
Hi [~epayne], thank you for your earlier response. We wanted to get your
suggestions on better handling multiple user cases. Currently, we are
considering a formula to calculate FairShare per app like:
{code:java}
foreach user:
if(tq.leafqueue.getUserLimit == 100)
fairSharePerApp = total Queue Capacity / # of apps of that user;
else
fairSharePerApp = UL / # of apps of that user;
{code}
So, according to the above formula, Say we have a scenario with 2 users and
UserLimit = 100%,
User1 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 50%)
* App1 (fairSharePerApp = 50%)
User2 (UL = 100%, fairSharePerUser = 50%)
* App2 (fairSharePerApp = 25%)
* App3 (fairSharePerApp = 25%)
Do you see any shortcomings in this formula or can suggest better ways of
handling multiple user issue? I would really appreciate it :)
cc: [~sunilg] [~wangda]
> Fair sharing intra-queue preemption support in Capacity Scheduler
> -
>
> Key: YARN-10559
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10559
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: capacityscheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.1.4
>Reporter: VADAGA ANANYO RAO
>Assignee: VADAGA ANANYO RAO
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: FairOP_preemption-design_doc_v1.pdf,
> FairOP_preemption-design_doc_v2.pdf, YARN-10559.0001.patch,
> YARN-10559.0002.patch, YARN-10559.0003.patch, YARN-10559.0004.patch,
> YARN-10559.0005.patch, YARN-10559.0006.patch, YARN-10559.0007.patch,
> YARN-10559.0008.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> Usecase:
> Due to the way Capacity Scheduler preemption works, If a single user submits
> a large application to a queue (using 100% of resources), that job will not
> be preempted by future applications from the same user within the same queue.
> This implies that the later applications will be forced to wait for
> completion of the long running application. This prevents multiple long
> running, large, applications from running concurrently.
> Support fair sharing among apps while preempting applications from same queue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279677#comment-17279677
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10532:
--
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
19s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
10s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
18m 41s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
46s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 2m
6s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config;
considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
4s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 49s{color} |
{color:orange}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/595/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt{color}
| {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 1 new + 305 unchanged - 1 fixed = 306 total (was 306)
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 29s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279538#comment-17279538 ] Qi Zhu edited comment on YARN-10610 at 2/5/21, 12:50 PM: - Thanks [~gandras] for review. Now there are non-bindings, i think. [~ztang] [~snemeth] [~pbacsko] If you any one could help commit it, thanks. was (Author: zhuqi): Thanks [~gandras] for review. Now there are non-bindings, i think. [~ztang] [~snemeth] If you any one could help commit it, thanks. > Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath. > --- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10178) Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its general contract'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279673#comment-17279673
]
Qi Zhu commented on YARN-10178:
---
The test failed is not related. These tests are all passed locally.
cc [~wangda] [~ztang] [~ebadger] [~bteke] [~tuyu]
If you any other advice.
> Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its
> general contract'
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacity scheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>Reporter: tuyu
>Assignee: Qi Zhu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10178.001.patch, YARN-10178.002.patch,
> YARN-10178.003.patch, YARN-10178.004.patch, YARN-10178.005.patch
>
>
> Global Scheduler Async Thread crash stack
> {code:java}
> ERROR org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.ResourceManager: Received
> RMFatalEvent of type CRITICAL_THREAD_CRASH, caused by a critical thread,
> Thread-6066574, that exited unexpectedly: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> Comparison method violates its general contract!
>at
> java.util.TimSort.mergeHi(TimSort.java:899)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeAt(TimSort.java:516)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeForceCollapse(TimSort.java:457)
> at java.util.TimSort.sort(TimSort.java:254)
> at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1512)
> at java.util.ArrayList.sort(ArrayList.java:1462)
> at java.util.Collections.sort(Collections.java:177)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.policy.PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.getAssignmentIterator(PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.java:221)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.sortAndGetChildrenAllocationIterator(ParentQueue.java:777)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainersToChildQueues(ParentQueue.java:791)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainers(ParentQueue.java:623)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateOrReserveNewContainers(CapacityScheduler.java:1635)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainerOnSingleNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1629)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1732)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1481)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.schedule(CapacityScheduler.java:569)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler$AsyncScheduleThread.run(CapacityScheduler.java:616)
> {code}
> JAVA 8 Arrays.sort default use timsort algo, and timsort has few require
> {code:java}
> 1.x.compareTo(y) != y.compareTo(x)
> 2.x>y,y>z --> x > z
> 3.x=y, x.compareTo(z) == y.compareTo(z)
> {code}
> if not Arrays paramters not satify this require,TimSort will throw
> 'java.lang.IllegalArgumentException'
> look at PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.compare function,we will know
> Capacity Scheduler use this these queue resource usage to compare
> {code:java}
> AbsoluteUsedCapacity
> UsedCapacity
> ConfiguredMinResource
> AbsoluteCapacity
> {code}
> In Capacity Scheduler Global Scheduler AsyncThread use
> PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy function to choose queue to assign
> container,and construct a CSAssignment struct, and use
> submitResourceCommitRequest function add CSAssignment to backlogs
> ResourceCommitterService will tryCommit this CSAssignment,look tryCommit
> function,there will update queue resource usage
> {code:java}
> public boolean tryCommit(Resource cluster, ResourceCommitRequest r,
> boolean updatePending) {
> long commitStart = System.nanoTime();
> ResourceCommitRequest request =
> (ResourceCommitRequest) r;
>
> ...
> boolean isSuccess = false;
> if (attemptId != null) {
> FiCaSchedulerApp app = getApplicationAttempt(attemptId);
> // Required sanity check for attemptId - when async-scheduling enabled,
> // proposal might be outdated if AM failover just finished
> // and proposal queue was not be consumed in time
> if (app != null && attemptId.equals(app.getApplicationAt
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10178) Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its general contract'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279665#comment-17279665
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10178:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
39s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 37m
3s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
19m 39s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 2m
19s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs
config; considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
15s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
54s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
54s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
17m 37s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {col
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10615) Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of short queue name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279660#comment-17279660 ] Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-10615: - Retriggered Jenkins. > Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of > short queue name > > > Key: YARN-10615 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: yarn >Reporter: Andras Gyori >Assignee: Andras Gyori >Priority: Critical > Attachments: YARN-10615.001.patch > > > The CSAutoQueueHandler validates the parent hierarchy of a queue path on > creation. The queues are queried by their short name, which might cause > ambiguity (short name of root.a is the same as root.b.a). We need to query > the queues from QueueManager by full queue path. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10615) Fix Auto Queue Creation hierarchy construction to use queue path instead of short queue name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279633#comment-17279633
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10615:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 18m
34s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 28m
40s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
8s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
4s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shadedclient {color} | {color:red} 18m
29s{color} |
{color:red}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/593/artifact/out/branch-shadedclient.txt{color}
| {color:red} branch has errors when building and testing our client
artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m
28s{color} |
{color:red}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/593/artifact/out/branch-javadoc-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager-jdkUbuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04.txt{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in trunk failed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m
30s{color} |
{color:red}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/593/artifact/out/branch-javadoc-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager-jdkPrivateBuild-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01.txt{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in trunk failed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 19m
57s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs
config; considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m
29s{color} |
{color:red}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/593/artifact/out/branch-findbugs-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in trunk failed. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 0m
23s{color} |
{color:red}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/593/artifact/out/patch-mvninstall-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 0m
22s{color} |
{color:red}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/593/artifact/out/patch-compile-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager-jdkUbuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04.txt{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 0m 22s{color}
|
{color:red}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/593/artifact/out/patch-compile-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager-jdkUbuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279538#comment-17279538 ] Qi Zhu commented on YARN-10610: --- Thanks [~gandras] for review. Now there are non-bindings, i think. [~ztang] [~snemeth] If you any one could help commit it, thanks. > Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath. > --- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279521#comment-17279521 ] Qi Zhu commented on YARN-10532: --- [~gandras] The test error is not related to this jira. Fixed check style in latest patch. [~wangda] [~epayne] [~ztang] If you any other advice for this. > Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is > not being used > > > Key: YARN-10532 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10532.001.patch, YARN-10532.002.patch, > YARN-10532.003.patch, YARN-10532.004.patch, YARN-10532.005.patch, > YARN-10532.006.patch, YARN-10532.007.patch, YARN-10532.008.patch, > YARN-10532.009.patch, YARN-10532.010.patch, YARN-10532.011.patch, > YARN-10532.012.patch, YARN-10532.013.patch, YARN-10532.014.patch, > YARN-10532.015.patch, YARN-10532.016.patch > > > It's better if we can delete auto-created queues when they are not in use for > a period of time (like 5 mins). It will be helpful when we have a large > number of auto-created queues (e.g. from 500 users), but only a small subset > of queues are actively used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Qi Zhu updated YARN-10532: -- Attachment: YARN-10532.016.patch > Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is > not being used > > > Key: YARN-10532 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10532.001.patch, YARN-10532.002.patch, > YARN-10532.003.patch, YARN-10532.004.patch, YARN-10532.005.patch, > YARN-10532.006.patch, YARN-10532.007.patch, YARN-10532.008.patch, > YARN-10532.009.patch, YARN-10532.010.patch, YARN-10532.011.patch, > YARN-10532.012.patch, YARN-10532.013.patch, YARN-10532.014.patch, > YARN-10532.015.patch, YARN-10532.016.patch > > > It's better if we can delete auto-created queues when they are not in use for > a period of time (like 5 mins). It will be helpful when we have a large > number of auto-created queues (e.g. from 500 users), but only a small subset > of queues are actively used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279499#comment-17279499
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10610:
--
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
40s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m
40s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 46s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
46s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs
config; considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
44s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 43s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {c
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10532) Capacity Scheduler Auto Queue Creation: Allow auto delete queue when queue is not being used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279498#comment-17279498
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10532:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 2m
30s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files
found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any
@author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color}
| {color:green}test4tests{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3
new or modified test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 30m
14s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
28s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
6s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
20m 19s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK Private
Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 2m
29s{color} | {color:blue}{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs
config; considering switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
26s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
14s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Ubuntu-11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
14s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_275-8u275-b01-0ubuntu1~20.04-b01 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 58s{color} |
{color:orange}https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/591/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt{color}
| {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 6 new + 305 unchanged - 1 fixed = 311 total (was 306)
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
7s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace
issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
18m 0s{color} | {color:green}{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when
building and testing our client artifacts. {co
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10610) Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with FairScheduler queuePath.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279458#comment-17279458 ] Andras Gyori commented on YARN-10610: - Thank you [~zhuqi] for the patch. It will be useful for the UI2 fix as well, as it is still using ambiguous short names for queue resolution. Looks good to me, +1. > Add queuePath to restful api for CapacityScheduler consistent with > FairScheduler queuePath. > --- > > Key: YARN-10610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10610 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Qi Zhu >Assignee: Qi Zhu >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10610.001.patch, YARN-10610.002.patch, > YARN-10610.003.patch, image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png > > > The cs only have queueName, but not full queuePath. > !image-2021-02-03-13-47-13-516.png|width=631,height=356! > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-10178) Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its general contract'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17270581#comment-17270581
]
Qi Zhu edited comment on YARN-10178 at 2/5/21, 8:54 AM:
cc [~wangda] [~ztang] [~bteke] [~BilwaST] [~tuyu] [~gandras]
Since the bug and related YARN-8737 have raised for more than 2 months, i have
faced the same issue recently. i have assigned to myself, and attached a patch
to fix it.
If you can help review it?
And if we need to add some performance test cases to confirm the performance
loss about the snapshot.
Thanks.
was (Author: zhuqi):
cc [~wangda] [~tangzhankun] [~bteke] [~BilwaST] [~tuyu] [~gandras]
Since the bug and related YARN-8737 have raised for more than 2 months, i have
faced the same issue recently. i have assigned to myself, and attached a patch
to fix it.
If you can help review it?
And if we need to add some performance test cases to confirm the performance
loss about the snapshot.
Thanks.
> Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its
> general contract'
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacity scheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>Reporter: tuyu
>Assignee: Qi Zhu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10178.001.patch, YARN-10178.002.patch,
> YARN-10178.003.patch, YARN-10178.004.patch, YARN-10178.005.patch
>
>
> Global Scheduler Async Thread crash stack
> {code:java}
> ERROR org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.ResourceManager: Received
> RMFatalEvent of type CRITICAL_THREAD_CRASH, caused by a critical thread,
> Thread-6066574, that exited unexpectedly: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> Comparison method violates its general contract!
>at
> java.util.TimSort.mergeHi(TimSort.java:899)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeAt(TimSort.java:516)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeForceCollapse(TimSort.java:457)
> at java.util.TimSort.sort(TimSort.java:254)
> at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1512)
> at java.util.ArrayList.sort(ArrayList.java:1462)
> at java.util.Collections.sort(Collections.java:177)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.policy.PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.getAssignmentIterator(PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.java:221)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.sortAndGetChildrenAllocationIterator(ParentQueue.java:777)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainersToChildQueues(ParentQueue.java:791)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainers(ParentQueue.java:623)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateOrReserveNewContainers(CapacityScheduler.java:1635)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainerOnSingleNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1629)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1732)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1481)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.schedule(CapacityScheduler.java:569)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler$AsyncScheduleThread.run(CapacityScheduler.java:616)
> {code}
> JAVA 8 Arrays.sort default use timsort algo, and timsort has few require
> {code:java}
> 1.x.compareTo(y) != y.compareTo(x)
> 2.x>y,y>z --> x > z
> 3.x=y, x.compareTo(z) == y.compareTo(z)
> {code}
> if not Arrays paramters not satify this require,TimSort will throw
> 'java.lang.IllegalArgumentException'
> look at PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.compare function,we will know
> Capacity Scheduler use this these queue resource usage to compare
> {code:java}
> AbsoluteUsedCapacity
> UsedCapacity
> ConfiguredMinResource
> AbsoluteCapacity
> {code}
> In Capacity Scheduler Global Scheduler AsyncThread use
> PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy function to choose queue to assign
> container,and construct a CSAssignment struct, and use
> submitResourceCommitRequest function add CSAssignment to backlogs
> ResourceCommitterService will tryCommit this CSAssignment,look tryComm
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-10178) Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its general contract'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17270581#comment-17270581
]
Qi Zhu edited comment on YARN-10178 at 2/5/21, 8:54 AM:
cc [~wangda] [~tangzhankun] [~bteke] [~BilwaST] [~tuyu] [~gandras]
Since the bug and related YARN-8737 have raised for more than 2 months, i have
faced the same issue recently. i have assigned to myself, and attached a patch
to fix it.
If you can help review it?
And if we need to add some performance test cases to confirm the performance
loss about the snapshot.
Thanks.
was (Author: zhuqi):
cc [~wangda] [~bteke] [~BilwaST] [~tuyu] [~gandras]
Since the bug and related YARN-8737 have raised for more than 2 months, i have
faced the same issue recently. i have assigned to myself, and attached a patch
to fix it.
If you can help review it?
And if we need to add some performance test cases to confirm the performance
loss about the snapshot.
Thanks.
> Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its
> general contract'
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacity scheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>Reporter: tuyu
>Assignee: Qi Zhu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10178.001.patch, YARN-10178.002.patch,
> YARN-10178.003.patch, YARN-10178.004.patch, YARN-10178.005.patch
>
>
> Global Scheduler Async Thread crash stack
> {code:java}
> ERROR org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.ResourceManager: Received
> RMFatalEvent of type CRITICAL_THREAD_CRASH, caused by a critical thread,
> Thread-6066574, that exited unexpectedly: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> Comparison method violates its general contract!
>at
> java.util.TimSort.mergeHi(TimSort.java:899)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeAt(TimSort.java:516)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeForceCollapse(TimSort.java:457)
> at java.util.TimSort.sort(TimSort.java:254)
> at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1512)
> at java.util.ArrayList.sort(ArrayList.java:1462)
> at java.util.Collections.sort(Collections.java:177)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.policy.PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.getAssignmentIterator(PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.java:221)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.sortAndGetChildrenAllocationIterator(ParentQueue.java:777)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainersToChildQueues(ParentQueue.java:791)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainers(ParentQueue.java:623)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateOrReserveNewContainers(CapacityScheduler.java:1635)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainerOnSingleNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1629)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1732)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1481)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.schedule(CapacityScheduler.java:569)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler$AsyncScheduleThread.run(CapacityScheduler.java:616)
> {code}
> JAVA 8 Arrays.sort default use timsort algo, and timsort has few require
> {code:java}
> 1.x.compareTo(y) != y.compareTo(x)
> 2.x>y,y>z --> x > z
> 3.x=y, x.compareTo(z) == y.compareTo(z)
> {code}
> if not Arrays paramters not satify this require,TimSort will throw
> 'java.lang.IllegalArgumentException'
> look at PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.compare function,we will know
> Capacity Scheduler use this these queue resource usage to compare
> {code:java}
> AbsoluteUsedCapacity
> UsedCapacity
> ConfiguredMinResource
> AbsoluteCapacity
> {code}
> In Capacity Scheduler Global Scheduler AsyncThread use
> PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy function to choose queue to assign
> container,and construct a CSAssignment struct, and use
> submitResourceCommitRequest function add CSAssignment to backlogs
> ResourceCommitterService will tryCommit this CSAssignment,look tryCommit
> func
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10178) Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its general contract'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279476#comment-17279476
]
Qi Zhu commented on YARN-10178:
---
Fixed check style and related things in latest patch.
> Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its
> general contract'
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacity scheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>Reporter: tuyu
>Assignee: Qi Zhu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10178.001.patch, YARN-10178.002.patch,
> YARN-10178.003.patch, YARN-10178.004.patch, YARN-10178.005.patch
>
>
> Global Scheduler Async Thread crash stack
> {code:java}
> ERROR org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.ResourceManager: Received
> RMFatalEvent of type CRITICAL_THREAD_CRASH, caused by a critical thread,
> Thread-6066574, that exited unexpectedly: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> Comparison method violates its general contract!
>at
> java.util.TimSort.mergeHi(TimSort.java:899)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeAt(TimSort.java:516)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeForceCollapse(TimSort.java:457)
> at java.util.TimSort.sort(TimSort.java:254)
> at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1512)
> at java.util.ArrayList.sort(ArrayList.java:1462)
> at java.util.Collections.sort(Collections.java:177)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.policy.PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.getAssignmentIterator(PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.java:221)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.sortAndGetChildrenAllocationIterator(ParentQueue.java:777)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainersToChildQueues(ParentQueue.java:791)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainers(ParentQueue.java:623)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateOrReserveNewContainers(CapacityScheduler.java:1635)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainerOnSingleNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1629)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1732)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1481)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.schedule(CapacityScheduler.java:569)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler$AsyncScheduleThread.run(CapacityScheduler.java:616)
> {code}
> JAVA 8 Arrays.sort default use timsort algo, and timsort has few require
> {code:java}
> 1.x.compareTo(y) != y.compareTo(x)
> 2.x>y,y>z --> x > z
> 3.x=y, x.compareTo(z) == y.compareTo(z)
> {code}
> if not Arrays paramters not satify this require,TimSort will throw
> 'java.lang.IllegalArgumentException'
> look at PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.compare function,we will know
> Capacity Scheduler use this these queue resource usage to compare
> {code:java}
> AbsoluteUsedCapacity
> UsedCapacity
> ConfiguredMinResource
> AbsoluteCapacity
> {code}
> In Capacity Scheduler Global Scheduler AsyncThread use
> PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy function to choose queue to assign
> container,and construct a CSAssignment struct, and use
> submitResourceCommitRequest function add CSAssignment to backlogs
> ResourceCommitterService will tryCommit this CSAssignment,look tryCommit
> function,there will update queue resource usage
> {code:java}
> public boolean tryCommit(Resource cluster, ResourceCommitRequest r,
> boolean updatePending) {
> long commitStart = System.nanoTime();
> ResourceCommitRequest request =
> (ResourceCommitRequest) r;
>
> ...
> boolean isSuccess = false;
> if (attemptId != null) {
> FiCaSchedulerApp app = getApplicationAttempt(attemptId);
> // Required sanity check for attemptId - when async-scheduling enabled,
> // proposal might be outdated if AM failover just finished
> // and proposal queue was not be consumed in time
> if (app != null && attemptId.equals(app.getApplicationAttemptId())) {
> if (app.accept(cluster, request, updatePending)
> && app.apply(c
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10178) Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its general contract'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Qi Zhu updated YARN-10178:
--
Attachment: YARN-10178.005.patch
> Global Scheduler async thread crash caused by 'Comparison method violates its
> general contract'
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10178
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacity scheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>Reporter: tuyu
>Assignee: Qi Zhu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10178.001.patch, YARN-10178.002.patch,
> YARN-10178.003.patch, YARN-10178.004.patch, YARN-10178.005.patch
>
>
> Global Scheduler Async Thread crash stack
> {code:java}
> ERROR org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.ResourceManager: Received
> RMFatalEvent of type CRITICAL_THREAD_CRASH, caused by a critical thread,
> Thread-6066574, that exited unexpectedly: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> Comparison method violates its general contract!
>at
> java.util.TimSort.mergeHi(TimSort.java:899)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeAt(TimSort.java:516)
> at java.util.TimSort.mergeForceCollapse(TimSort.java:457)
> at java.util.TimSort.sort(TimSort.java:254)
> at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1512)
> at java.util.ArrayList.sort(ArrayList.java:1462)
> at java.util.Collections.sort(Collections.java:177)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.policy.PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.getAssignmentIterator(PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.java:221)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.sortAndGetChildrenAllocationIterator(ParentQueue.java:777)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainersToChildQueues(ParentQueue.java:791)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.ParentQueue.assignContainers(ParentQueue.java:623)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateOrReserveNewContainers(CapacityScheduler.java:1635)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainerOnSingleNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1629)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1732)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.allocateContainersToNode(CapacityScheduler.java:1481)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler.schedule(CapacityScheduler.java:569)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler$AsyncScheduleThread.run(CapacityScheduler.java:616)
> {code}
> JAVA 8 Arrays.sort default use timsort algo, and timsort has few require
> {code:java}
> 1.x.compareTo(y) != y.compareTo(x)
> 2.x>y,y>z --> x > z
> 3.x=y, x.compareTo(z) == y.compareTo(z)
> {code}
> if not Arrays paramters not satify this require,TimSort will throw
> 'java.lang.IllegalArgumentException'
> look at PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy.compare function,we will know
> Capacity Scheduler use this these queue resource usage to compare
> {code:java}
> AbsoluteUsedCapacity
> UsedCapacity
> ConfiguredMinResource
> AbsoluteCapacity
> {code}
> In Capacity Scheduler Global Scheduler AsyncThread use
> PriorityUtilizationQueueOrderingPolicy function to choose queue to assign
> container,and construct a CSAssignment struct, and use
> submitResourceCommitRequest function add CSAssignment to backlogs
> ResourceCommitterService will tryCommit this CSAssignment,look tryCommit
> function,there will update queue resource usage
> {code:java}
> public boolean tryCommit(Resource cluster, ResourceCommitRequest r,
> boolean updatePending) {
> long commitStart = System.nanoTime();
> ResourceCommitRequest request =
> (ResourceCommitRequest) r;
>
> ...
> boolean isSuccess = false;
> if (attemptId != null) {
> FiCaSchedulerApp app = getApplicationAttempt(attemptId);
> // Required sanity check for attemptId - when async-scheduling enabled,
> // proposal might be outdated if AM failover just finished
> // and proposal queue was not be consumed in time
> if (app != null && attemptId.equals(app.getApplicationAttemptId())) {
> if (app.accept(cluster, request, updatePending)
> && app.apply(cluster, request, updatePending)) { // apply this
> resource
> ...
