[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15030100#comment-15030100 ] Junping Du commented on YARN-1480: -- Hi, can we move this out of 2.6.3? Thanks! > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch, > YARN-1480-5.patch, YARN-1480-6.patch, YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15033765#comment-15033765 ] Junping Du commented on YARN-1480: -- Move it to 2.6.4 as no update on JIRA for a while. > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch, > YARN-1480-5.patch, YARN-1480-6.patch, YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15103964#comment-15103964 ] Junping Du commented on YARN-1480: -- Move it out of 2.6.4 given no update in this JIRA for a long time. > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch, > YARN-1480-5.patch, YARN-1480-6.patch, YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14692545#comment-14692545 ] Sangjin Lee commented on YARN-1480: --- Should this be targeted to 2.6.2? We're trying to release 2.6.1 soon. Let me know. > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch, > YARN-1480-5.patch, YARN-1480-6.patch, YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14933617#comment-14933617 ] Sangjin Lee commented on YARN-1480: --- [~kj-ki], [~zjshen], any update on this JIRA? > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch, > YARN-1480-5.patch, YARN-1480-6.patch, YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14028724#comment-14028724
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1480:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12625313/YARN-1480-4.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3968//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI
> "list" command
> --
>
> Key: YARN-1480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Kenji Kikushima
> Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch,
> YARN-1480.patch
>
>
> Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than
> ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO,
> ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it
> better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14029024#comment-14029024
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1480:
-
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12650030/YARN-1480-5.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3970//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3970//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI
> "list" command
> --
>
> Key: YARN-1480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Kenji Kikushima
> Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch,
> YARN-1480-5.patch, YARN-1480.patch
>
>
> Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than
> ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO,
> ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it
> better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033502#comment-14033502
]
Zhijie Shen commented on YARN-1480:
---
Hi [~kj-ki], thanks for the patch. Here're some meta comments on it:
1. I looked into the current RMWebServices#getApps(), and below is the list of
missing options in ApplicationCLI. "queue" (current "queue" option is for the
"movetoqueue" command) and "tags" are not covered in the patch. If it's not a
big addition, is it better to include these two options into the option list?
{code}
@QueryParam("finalStatus") String finalStatusQuery,
@QueryParam("user") String userQuery,
@QueryParam("queue") String queueQuery,
@QueryParam("limit") String count,
@QueryParam("startedTimeBegin") String startedBegin,
@QueryParam("startedTimeEnd") String startedEnd,
@QueryParam("finishedTimeBegin") String finishBegin,
@QueryParam("finishedTimeEnd") String finishEnd,
@QueryParam("applicationTags") Set applicationTags
{code}
2. ApplicationClientProtocol#getApplications already support full filters,
while YarnClient seems not to support the full options now. IMHO, the right way
here is to make YarnClient to support full filters, and ApplicationCLI simply
calls the API. It is an inefficient way to pull a long app list from RM and do
local filtering.
> RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI
> "list" command
> --
>
> Key: YARN-1480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Kenji Kikushima
> Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch,
> YARN-1480-5.patch, YARN-1480.patch
>
>
> Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than
> ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO,
> ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it
> better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13841872#comment-13841872 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-1480: -- I think it definitely make sense to add the missing filters in ApplicationCLI. > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878223#comment-13878223
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1480:
-
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12624265/YARN-1480.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2924//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2924//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI
> "list" command
> --
>
> Key: YARN-1480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Kenji Kikushima
> Attachments: YARN-1480.patch
>
>
> Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than
> ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO,
> ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it
> better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878312#comment-13878312 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on YARN-1480: - [~kj-ki], thank you for taking this! Would you also document new command options to hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/apt/YarnCommands.apt.vm? > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878314#comment-13878314 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on YARN-1480: - Link to YARN-1531 for command line documentation. > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878410#comment-13878410
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1480:
-
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12624300/YARN-1480-2.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2926//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2926//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI
> "list" command
> --
>
> Key: YARN-1480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Kenji Kikushima
> Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480.patch
>
>
> Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than
> ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO,
> ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it
> better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13880029#comment-13880029 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on YARN-1480: - Thanks for renewing the patch! I built a document and it looks good. I also confirmed the CLI behavior. Would you add a test case for invalid finalStatus as that for invalid appStates? > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13881719#comment-13881719
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1480:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12625013/YARN-1480-3.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The following test timeouts occurred in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client:
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestNMClient
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2935//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2935//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI
> "list" command
> --
>
> Key: YARN-1480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Kenji Kikushima
> Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480.patch
>
>
> Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than
> ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO,
> ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it
> better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882548#comment-13882548
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1480:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12625313/YARN-1480-4.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The following test timeouts occurred in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client:
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestNMClient
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2941//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2941//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI
> "list" command
> --
>
> Key: YARN-1480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Kenji Kikushima
> Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch,
> YARN-1480.patch
>
>
> Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than
> ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO,
> ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it
> better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882636#comment-13882636 ] Kenji Kikushima commented on YARN-1480: --- I tried "mvn test -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestNMClient", but no error occurred. Hmm... > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch, > YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1480) RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI "list" command
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882798#comment-13882798 ] Akira AJISAKA commented on YARN-1480: - +1, the timeout in TestNMClient is not related to the patch. > RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than ApplicationCLI > "list" command > -- > > Key: YARN-1480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1480 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Zhijie Shen >Assignee: Kenji Kikushima > Attachments: YARN-1480-2.patch, YARN-1480-3.patch, YARN-1480-4.patch, > YARN-1480.patch > > > Nowadays RM web services getApps() accepts many more filters than > ApplicationCLI "list" command, which only accepts "state" and "type". IMHO, > ideally, different interfaces should provide consistent functionality. Is it > better to allow more filters in ApplicationCLI? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)
