[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-16 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15284734#comment-15284734
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4325:
--

+1 lgtm.  Committing this.


> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325-v2.patch, YARN-4325-v3.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v3.patch, YARN-4325-v4.1.patch, YARN-4325-v4.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-16 Thread Junping Du (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15284439#comment-15284439
 ] 

Junping Du commented on YARN-4325:
--

The left checkstyle issue is not valid. [~jlowe], mind to take a look at it 
again?

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325-v2.patch, YARN-4325-v3.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v3.patch, YARN-4325-v4.1.patch, YARN-4325-v4.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-14 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15283697#comment-15283697
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4325:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m 
34s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
50s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 18s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
24s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager:
 patch generated 1 new + 141 unchanged - 2 fixed = 142 total (was 143) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 19s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.8.0_91. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 53s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
18s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 38m 8s {color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:cf2ee45 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12804044/YARN-4325-v4.1.patch |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-4325 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 3f792f4c6b1c 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-13 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15283245#comment-15283245
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4325:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 
20s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 27s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
57s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
25s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager:
 patch generated 2 new + 141 unchanged - 2 fixed = 143 total (was 143) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
12s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 5s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 47s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.8.0_91. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 45s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
17s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 39m 56s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:cf2ee45 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12803960/YARN-4325-v4.patch |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-4325 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 5a0c8873f4b2 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-13 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15282726#comment-15282726
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4325:
--

Appears Jenkins is having difficulty posting to JIRA.  Overall was +1 from 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/11448/console.

Patch is looking better, but there's still an issue in the 
NonAggregatingLogHandler.  First the added code seems redundant, since just a 
few lines earlier it sent the same event:
{code}
  // Inform the application before the actual delete itself, so that links
  // to logs will no longer be there on NM web-UI.
  NonAggregatingLogHandler.this.dispatcher.getEventHandler().handle(
new ApplicationEvent(this.applicationId,
  ApplicationEventType.APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FINISHED));
  if (localAppLogDirs.size() > 0) {
NonAggregatingLogHandler.this.delService.delete(user, null,
  (Path[]) localAppLogDirs.toArray(new Path[localAppLogDirs.size()]));
  }
  try {
NonAggregatingLogHandler.this.stateStore.removeLogDeleter(
this.applicationId);
  } catch (IOException e) {
LOG.error("Error removing log deletion state", e);
  } finally {
NonAggregatingLogHandler.this.dispatcher.getEventHandler().handle(
new ApplicationEvent(this.applicationId,
ApplicationEventType.APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FINISHED));
  }
{code}

It looks to me that once we get the LogDeleterRunnable going we're always 
sending the necessary event without any additional changes.  What I meant by my 
previous comment was fixing the early out from this code where we initially 
receive the finished event:
{code}
  case APPLICATION_FINISHED:
LogHandlerAppFinishedEvent appFinishedEvent =
(LogHandlerAppFinishedEvent) event;
ApplicationId appId = appFinishedEvent.getApplicationId();
// Schedule - so that logs are available on the UI till they're deleted.
LOG.info("Scheduling Log Deletion for application: "
+ appId + ", with delay of "
+ this.deleteDelaySeconds + " seconds");
String user = appOwners.remove(appId);
if (user == null) {
  LOG.error("Unable to locate user for " + appId);
  break;
}
{code}

In the unlikely event that we can't lookup the user for an appID we need to 
send a failed event so ApplicationImpl can cleanup the app from the state store 
since there won't be a LogDeleterRunnable to do it.

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325-v2.patch, YARN-4325-v3.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v3.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-13 Thread Junping Du (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15282658#comment-15282658
 ] 

Junping Du commented on YARN-4325:
--

The Jenkins doesn't get triggered automatically for some reason... manually 
kick off the test.

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325-v2.patch, YARN-4325-v3.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v3.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-12 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15281960#comment-15281960
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4325:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 
0s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 25s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 24s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
51s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
24s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager:
 patch generated 5 new + 143 unchanged - 1 fixed = 148 total (was 144) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 3 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git 
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 5s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 18s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.8.0_91. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 45s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
19s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 39m 13s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:cf2ee45 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12803713/YARN-4325-v3.patch |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-4325 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 2d3e55fb2dfe 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| 

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-11 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15280731#comment-15280731
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4325:
--

Thanks, Junping!  The test failure is related.  In addition to the javac 
warning that should be cleaned up, it looks like there's an unlikely code path 
in NonAggregatingLogHandler where if we fail to lookup the appId then it 
doesn't respond to the APPLICATION_FINISHED event.

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325-v2.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-11 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15280689#comment-15280689
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4325:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 
22s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 27s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
54s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
27s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 2m 38s {color} 
| {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager-jdk1.8.0_91
 with JDK v1.8.0_91 generated 1 new + 15 unchanged - 0 fixed = 16 total (was 
15) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 3m 4s {color} 
| {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager-jdk1.7.0_95
 with JDK v1.7.0_95 generated 1 new + 17 unchanged - 0 fixed = 18 total (was 
17) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
12s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 7s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 11m 41s {color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch failed with JDK 
v1.8.0_91. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 11m 51s {color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch failed with JDK 
v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
18s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 40m 0s {color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_91 Failed junit tests | 

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-11 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15280176#comment-15280176
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4325:
--

Yes, what I'm proposing is to have the log handlers always respond to the 
APPLICATION_FINISHED event.  We can look at this problem in two ways: either 
the bug is in the ApplicationImpl because it doesn't track that log handling 
failed and sometimes needs to clean up the app in other states, or the bug is 
in the log handlers because they failed to respond to the APPLICATION_FINISHED 
event when the application terminated.  If the log handlers always responded to 
the APPLICATION_FINISHED event with an APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED or 
APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FINISHED event, wouldn't that also solve the problem?  
Then ApplicationImpl can simply wait until the terminal finished state to 
receive one of the log handling replies and then clean up the app in _one_ 
place rather than several places depending upon the special case being handled.


> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-10 Thread Junping Du (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15279212#comment-15279212
 ] 

Junping Du commented on YARN-4325:
--

Thanks [~jlowe] for comments. I agree that adding a boolean flag may not be a 
very decent solution. However, given APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event 
could be sent when app is still running, we have to cache this event (in 
boolean flag or some other way) so later we can do app cleanup when app is 
finished. 
Do we have better way to achieve this?

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-10 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15278751#comment-15278751
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4325:
--

I'm just thinking the explicit boolean check and special-case logic is a bit 
ugly compared to the typical flow.  If we simply changed the log handlers so 
they dont ignore events and always send a response then I don't think we need 
the special tracking. gets an event.  For example, if the log handlers receive 
an event for an app they are no longer tracking (because the app log handling 
failed to init or whatever) then it immediately sends back the 
APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED or APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FINISHED event.  
Then we can have the app state machine always clean up in the final finished 
state as normal rather than having special-case removal logic in other states.

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-10 Thread Junping Du (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15278711#comment-15278711
 ] 

Junping Du commented on YARN-4325:
--

Thanks [~jlowe] for review and comments!
bq. For AppCompletelyDoneTransition it seems a little odd that we fire off a 
log event then remove the app that goes with that event. 
There is a case that the log event (LogHandlerAppFinishedEvent) won't be 
handled as aggregator for this application has problem during initiating app 
before (YARN-4984 fix this to skip creating unnecessary aggregator threads). In 
this case, we need to handle remove app from NM state store here. Isn't it? I 
agree that it could be better to combine the logic that either send the log 
event or remove the apps from NM state store, and will update patch according 
to it.

bq.  Is the better fix to have the log aggregators properly return a log failed 
event in these cases?
After the fix in YARN-4984. log aggregators won't be created in case of 
initiation failure to get rid of thread leaks. However, log failed event should 
be sent earlier in this case, so we mark the logHandlingDone flag to true. When 
app is finished and logHandlingDone is true, we just cleanup application from 
NM state store directly. Any concern for this logic?

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-06 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15274198#comment-15274198
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4325:
--

Thanks for the patch!

For AppCompletelyDoneTransition it seems a little odd that we fire off a log 
event then remove the app that goes with that event.  I would expect we would 
either wait for the log finished/failed event and cleanup in the FINISHED state 
like we normally do or not send the log event at all since we already know it 
is failed/done.  Is the better fix to have the log aggregators properly return 
a log failed event in these cases?

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-06 Thread Junping Du (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15274087#comment-15274087
 ] 

Junping Du commented on YARN-4325:
--

Can someone in watch list review patch here? Thanks!

> Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases
> 
>
> Key: YARN-4325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>Reporter: Junping Du
>Assignee: Junping Du
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ApplicationImpl.PNG, YARN-4325-v1.1.patch, 
> YARN-4325-v1.patch, YARN-4325.patch
>
>
> From a long running cluster, we found tens of thousands of stale apps still 
> be recovered in NM restart recovery. 
> After investigating, there are three issues cause app state leak in NM 
> state-store:
> 1. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED is not handled with remove App in 
> NMStateStore.
> 2. APPLICATION_LOG_HANDLING_FAILED event is missing in sent when hit 
> aggregator's doAppLogAggregation() exception case.
> 3. Only Application in FINISHED status receiving APPLICATION_LOG_FINISHED has 
> transition to remove app in NM state store. Application in other status - 
> like APPLICATION_RESOURCES_CLEANUP will ignore the event and later forget to 
> remove this app from NM state store even after app get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-05-06 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15274045#comment-15274045
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4325:
-

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 
24s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 27s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 27s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
52s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
25s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 24s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 24s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
15s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 3s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 18s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.8.0_91. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 48s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
20s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 39m 39s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:cf2ee45 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12802662/YARN-4325-v1.1.patch |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-4325 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux a233c450cb8c 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 2835f14 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_95 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4325) Purge app state from NM state-store should cover more LOG_HANDLING cases

2016-04-28 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15262555#comment-15262555
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4325:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 11s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m 
44s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_92 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
15s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
12s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
50s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_92 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
23s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_92 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 2m 26s {color} 
| {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager-jdk1.8.0_92
 with JDK v1.8.0_92 generated 1 new + 15 unchanged - 0 fixed = 16 total (was 
15) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 2m 49s {color} 
| {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager-jdk1.7.0_95
 with JDK v1.7.0_95 generated 1 new + 17 unchanged - 0 fixed = 18 total (was 
17) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:red} 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager:
 patch generated 1 new + 34 unchanged - 0 fixed = 35 total (was 34) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 25s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git 
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_92 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 9s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.8.0_92. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 41s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed with 
JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
21s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} |