[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16347110#comment-16347110 ] Hudson commented on YARN-6619: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #13589 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/13589/]) YARN-6619. AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and (arun suresh: rev 29d9e4d5814900d5c59d77fe05d32186d4ad9385) * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/rmcontainer/RMContainerImpl.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/async/AMRMClientAsync.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/async/impl/AMRMClientAsyncImpl.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/impl/TestAMRMClient.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/constraint/PlacementConstraintsUtil.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/AMRMClient.java * (add) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/impl/TestAMRMClientPlacementConstraints.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/impl/AMRMClientImpl.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/AbstractYarnScheduler.java * (add) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/impl/BaseAMRMClientTest.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Fix For: YARN-6592 > > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.004.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16329184#comment-16329184 ] Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-6619: -- +1 to the latest patch from me too – thanks [~asuresh]. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.004.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16329098#comment-16329098 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-6619: -- +1, will commit today if no objections, will add unstable/public to methods of AMRMClientAsync while committing. Thanks [~asuresh] > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.004.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328373#comment-16328373
]
genericqa commented on YARN-6619:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
18s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-6592 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 68m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 32m
35s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
8s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
28s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 14s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
1s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
14s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 5s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 21 new + 202 unchanged - 11 fixed = 223 total (was 213) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 56s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 66m
6s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 24m 47s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}246m 57s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestAMRMClientOnRMRestart |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:5b98639 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-6619 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12906320/YARN-6619-YARN-6592.004.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 933eb615219c 3.13.0-135-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 18
11:55:51 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | YARN-6592 / f476b83 |
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328359#comment-16328359 ] Arun Suresh commented on YARN-6619: --- As I mentioned earlier, the test case failure is unrelated. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.004.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328351#comment-16328351
]
genericqa commented on YARN-6619:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-6592 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 75m
35s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 31m
45s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
34s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
2s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
26s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 6s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
51s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 59s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 21 new + 202 unchanged - 11 fixed = 223 total (was 213) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
18s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 17s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
4s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 60m
53s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 23m 30s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}239m 56s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestAMRMClientOnRMRestart |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:5b98639 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-6619 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12906318/YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 2f7ce7cdee35 4.4.0-43-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 12
13:48:03 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | YARN-6592 / f476b83 |
|
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328331#comment-16328331
]
genericqa commented on YARN-6619:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 10m
41s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-6592 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 71m
45s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 52m
34s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
24s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
40s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 4s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
55s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
7s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
10s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 6s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 18 new + 202 unchanged - 11 fixed = 220 total (was 213) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 10s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 61m 0s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 23m 14s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}270m 56s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.reservation.TestCapacityOverTimePolicy |
| | hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestAMRMClientOnRMRestart |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:5b98639 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-6619 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12906145/YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 4f32d6b7971f 3.13.0-135-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 18
11:55:51 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328226#comment-16328226 ] Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-6619: -- Agreed with deciding it later. I think we agreed in our last meeting that PlacementConstraints that are defined in the SchedulingRequest will have as source tags the tags of that SchedulingRequest. So there should be no cases of PlacementConstraints associated with empty source tags. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.004.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328208#comment-16328208 ] Arun Suresh commented on YARN-6619: --- bq. could u update java doc to mark unstable of this API? Ah.. Updated patch (v004) with the unstable annotation. bq. but in my mind, a SchedulingRequest without PlacementConstraint should be treated same as ResourceRequest with resourceName = *. You mean SchedulingRequests without PlacementConstratints OR tags should be treated the same as exiting * ResourceRequests. But agreed, lets decide that later. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.004.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328202#comment-16328202
]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-6619:
--
[~asuresh] , could u update java doc to mark unstable of this API?
{quote}If there are no tags in the scheduling request, then the scheduler
should expect a Placement Constraint, which applies to that specific scheduling
request - that check I guess is done in YARN-6599
{quote}
I'm not sure if I verified this, but in my mind, a SchedulingRequest without
PlacementConstraint should be treated same as ResourceRequest with resourceName
= *. I'm not sure if we should associate an empty tag or default tag with the
container with null allocation tag, maybe we shouldn't. Since this isn't
related to the Jira, let's decide it later.
> AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest
> objects
>
>
> Key: YARN-6619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Arun Suresh
>Assignee: Arun Suresh
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch,
> YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch
>
>
> Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate
> the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328195#comment-16328195
]
Arun Suresh commented on YARN-6619:
---
Update the patch (v003) based on [~kkaranasos]'s and [~leftnoteasy]'s
suggestions.
* Removed the {{addPlacementConstratint}} method and included it as an optional
parameter in the register call.
* as per wangda's suggestion, am now just updating the numAllocations instead
of adding.
* moved the scheduler matching check to a separate function - and removed the
resource sizing equality check
bq. If there are no tags, do we still associate a constraint with an empty tag?
If there are no tags in the scheduling request, then the scheduler should
expect a Placement Constraint, which applies to that specific scheduling
request - that check I guess is done in YARN-6599
> AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest
> objects
>
>
> Key: YARN-6619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Arun Suresh
>Assignee: Arun Suresh
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch,
> YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-6619-YARN-6592.003.patch
>
>
> Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate
> the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328112#comment-16328112 ] Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-6619: -- If YARN-6599 does not need it (which, thinking more about it, it should not need it), then I would prefer to remove it as well. Given that we want constraints get added only with the registerAM, removing it will avoid misuse of it (as in calling it after calling registerAM). We can add it back when needed. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328105#comment-16328105
]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-6619:
--
[~kkaranasos] , is this supported?
{quote}bq. This way we can reserve the {{addPlacementConstraint}} API for
cases that a client wants to update the constraints.
{quote}
IIUC, the only way to update PlacementConstraint, as well as pending
ResourceSizing, is to send a new SchedulingRequest correct? If there's no
separate updatePlacementConstraint API, I suggest to remove
addPlacementConstraint from AMRMClient as of now and add it back when needed.
> AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest
> objects
>
>
> Key: YARN-6619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Arun Suresh
>Assignee: Arun Suresh
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch,
> YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch
>
>
> Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate
> the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328069#comment-16328069
]
Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-6619:
--
Thanks for the patch, [~asuresh]. Couple of comments:
* Let's add a new {{registerAM}} API to the {{AMRMClient}} that takes a map
from tag sets to constraints. This way we can reserve the
{{addPlacementConstraint}} API for cases that a client wants to update the
constraints. By extending the {{registerAM}} method, we don't need to worry
about the client calling the {{addPlacementConstraint}} before calling the
{{registerAM}}.
* I think it's more precise to keep the {{addConstraint}} method to its
current name (no "default"). If a scheduling request wants to override those,
it's fine, but I wouldn't call them default.
* If there are no tags, do we still associate a constraint with an empty tag?
* {{addToOutstandingSchedulingRequests()}}: let's put the long if statement in
a new method.
Nit: in AMRMClientAsync, "called when the RM has rejected a Scheduling
Requests" (let's remove either the a or the plural).
> AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest
> objects
>
>
> Key: YARN-6619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Arun Suresh
>Assignee: Arun Suresh
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch,
> YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch
>
>
> Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate
> the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328058#comment-16328058 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-6619: -- Quickly discussed with Arun, we will keep the main logic of AMRMClientImpl changes to make sure AMRMClient can resend estimated pending requests to RM on RM failover. Following changes needed: - We don't need to increase #pending_num_allocation for a request with the same schedulerRequestKey. Instead, we should replace #pending-ask with the new number. And no need to check resourceSizing. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328034#comment-16328034 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-6619: -- 1) AMRMClient.java 1.1 addPlacementConstraint: maybe change a better name, such as addDefaultPlacementConstraintMapping(...). Existing naming is a bit confused with addSchedulingRequests since PlacementConstraint is a part of SchedulingRequest. 1.2 Mark both methods to unstable. 1.3 Same applies to AMRMClientAsync.java changes. 2) AMRMClientImpl.java I found the implementation uses the similar approach of ResourceRequest which has a local cached pending request and deduct pending request for container allocation, etc. We know the downside of this approach is it has local states and sometimes it could receive extra containers from RM. I propose to simplify this approach: - Don't cache local requests, all requests will be cleared after sending to RM. - Because of above, don't need to do anything after container received. 3) Test cases failure related? > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch, > YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch > > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16326918#comment-16326918
]
genericqa commented on YARN-6619:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
16s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-6592 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
50s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
40s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
30s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
24s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 5s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
50s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 58s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 18 new + 202 unchanged - 11 fixed = 220 total (was 213) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
18s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 20s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 65m
31s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 24m 40s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}155m 3s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestAMRMClientOnRMRestart |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:5b98639 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-6619 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12906145/YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 1b82078fa630 4.4.0-64-generic #85-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 20
11:50:30 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | YARN-6592 / f476b83 |
|
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16326589#comment-16326589
]
Arun Suresh commented on YARN-6619:
---
Fixing some of the checkstyle.
{{TestAMRMClientONRMRestart}} is an existing issue.
{{TestOpportunisticContainerAllocationE2E}} works fine for me locally. But it
is a bit flaky, and the reason is due to how tags are added and removed for
opportunistic containers. WIll provide a proper fix in YARN-7752
> AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest
> objects
>
>
> Key: YARN-6619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Arun Suresh
>Assignee: Arun Suresh
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch,
> YARN-6619-YARN-6592.002.patch
>
>
> Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate
> the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16325961#comment-16325961
]
genericqa commented on YARN-6619:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
19s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-6592 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
52s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
18s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
20s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
23s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 14s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
52s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} YARN-6592 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 58s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 28 new + 205 unchanged - 8 fixed = 233 total (was 213) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 21s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 67m
0s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 24m 33s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}155m 57s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestOpportunisticContainerAllocationE2E |
| | hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestAMRMClientOnRMRestart |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:5b98639 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-6619 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12906060/YARN-6619-YARN-6592.001.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 23c8f2ebc664 4.4.0-64-generic #85-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 20
11:50:30 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/p
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16313879#comment-16313879 ] Panagiotis Garefalakis commented on YARN-6619: -- [~asuresh] not at all, it relates with YARN-7696 so it makes sense. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Arun Suresh > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6619) AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest objects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16313842#comment-16313842 ] Arun Suresh commented on YARN-6619: --- [~pgaref], hope you don't mind - but im reassigning this to myself. > AMRMClient Changes to use the PlacementConstraint and SchcedulingRequest > objects > > > Key: YARN-6619 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6619 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Arun Suresh >Assignee: Panagiotis Garefalakis > > Opening this JIRA to track changes needed in the AMRMClient to incorporate > the PlacementConstraint and SchedulingRequest objects -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
