[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16345918#comment-16345918 ] Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-7292: I these are still relevant questions and something I'd like to sort out for 3.1. My thoughts: 1) I could go either way on the client v/s server, but I think it's more useful to have on the client side. It makes the code significantly simpler on the server side and allows users to define their own profiles. 2) No, no, and no. They're redundant with what's already specified by resource types. 3) Same question as #1. I vote for client side. 4) If we're supporting server-side profiles, overrides are required in order for the profiles to be useful. If we're going with client-side profiles, then overrides are moot. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16346465#comment-16346465 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- [~templedf] , Thanks for posting your comments, I agree with your 2/3/4, and for 1, I still prefer server instead of the client since it's better to make sure a given profile means the same across apps/clients in the same cluster. Since I will be off in the next few weeks, I will try to get a draft patch ready by today or tomorrow and talked to [~sunilg] offline, [~sunilg] will help this. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349731#comment-16349731 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Attached ver.1 patch (wip) to see how much it breaks. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349811#comment-16349811
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
18s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 4 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
46s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
53s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
35s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 42s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
12s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
19s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
14s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 59s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 6 new + 198 unchanged - 8 fixed = 204 total (was 206) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 22s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m
48s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client
generated 2 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 2 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
18s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 28m
2s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 13m 41s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}110m 16s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client |
| | Possible null pointer dereference of AMRMClientImpl.resourceProfilesMap
in
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.AMRMClientImpl.checkAndGetResourceProfile(String,
Resource) Dereferenced at
AMRMClientImpl.java:AMRMClientImpl.resourceProfilesMap in
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.AMRMClientImpl.checkAndGetResourceProfile(String,
Resource) Der
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16351707#comment-16351707 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Attached ver.2 patch, fixed reported issues and completed all changes (i think so). > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16351712#comment-16351712
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 4s{color}
| {color:red} YARN-7292 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong Branch?
See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7292 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12909132/YARN-7292.002.patch |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/19597/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
> -
>
> Key: YARN-7292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>Reporter: Wangda Tan
>Assignee: Wangda Tan
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch
>
>
> Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a
> couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated:
> 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side:
> Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally:
> - Advantages:
> A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t
> change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run
> under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit
> is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing.
> - Disadvantages:
> Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles.
> 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as
> minimum/maximum/default?
> 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should
> client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource
> fields?
> 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should
> send final resource to RM?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16351770#comment-16351770 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Rebased to latest trunk (003) > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16351826#comment-16351826
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
26s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 7 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
48s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 14m
53s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
32s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
10s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 40s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
6s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
22s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
9s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 6m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 49s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 5 new + 298 unchanged - 11 fixed = 303 total (was 309) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
9m 21s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing our
client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m
42s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
8s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
8s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 77m 29s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 28m 24s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 12m 50s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16352038#comment-16352038 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-7292: --- Hi [~leftnoteasy]. Thanks for the patch. Generally approach seems fine. I will help in clearing jenkins etc today. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16353255#comment-16353255 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-7292: --- It seems Findbugs warning which is shown in the report and the link are different. I ll re-run one more time. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16353435#comment-16353435
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
33s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 7 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
10s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m
30s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
28s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 36s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
10s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
32s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 8m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 0s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 5 new + 298 unchanged - 11 fixed = 303 total (was 309) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
9m 58s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing our
client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m
41s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
19s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
13s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 67m 27s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 28m 17s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 12m
45s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the
patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16353580#comment-16353580 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-7292: --- Fixed jenkins. [~templedf], could you please take a look > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16353785#comment-16353785
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
37s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 7 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 16m
20s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
36s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 52s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
10s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
44s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
10s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 8m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 0s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 2 new + 298 unchanged - 11 fixed = 300 total (was 309) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
9m 59s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing our
client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 6m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
9s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
16s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 66m 34s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 28m 20s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 12m 42s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}2
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16359737#comment-16359737 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Thanks [~sunilg] for help updating the patch. [~templedf], could you help to check this patch? We plan to get this done in a day or two. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16360319#comment-16360319 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Rebased to latest trunk (005) > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16360380#comment-16360380
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
28s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 7 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
49s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
44s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
15s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
19s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 47s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
12s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 3m
11s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 0m
32s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 2m
6s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} cc {color} | {color:red} 2m 6s{color} |
{color:red} hadoop-yarn in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 2m 6s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 49s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 2 new + 297 unchanged - 11 fixed = 299 total (was 308) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvnsite {color} | {color:red} 0m
34s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shadedclient {color} | {color:red} 3m
40s{color} | {color:red} patch has errors when building and testing our client
artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m
29s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
1s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
5s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 0m 31s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 27m 37s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 15m 5s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} The patch does
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16360642#comment-16360642
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
27s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 9 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
22s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
25s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
57s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 46s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
14s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 3m
10s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 6m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 59s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 2 new + 318 unchanged - 17 fixed = 320 total (was 335) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 22s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 6m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
15s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
14s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 68m
46s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 28m 40s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 12m
48s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the
patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color}
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16360912#comment-16360912 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Failed test case is not related. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361217#comment-16361217 ] Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-7292: Sorry, still running way behind. Looking at the patch, it looks like you're ripping profiles out as an independent entity, presumably replacing them with resources. I think that largely makes sense. What's the plan with the overrides? We had issues with the current approach because MR *always* specifies the memory and CPU, so if we assume that a specified value overrides the profile, the profile will always be overridden. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361779#comment-16361779 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Hi [~templedf], bq. What's the plan with the overrides? The profile will always be overridden in AMRMClient implementation, for applications use non AMRMClient, they can define their own logic to handle profile. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361805#comment-16361805 ] Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-7292: Hang on. If I understand that correctly, you're saying that in order to not have the profile overridden, the app developer has to create their own AMRMClient implementation? Doesn't that mean that profiles will always be overridden in all practical cases, e.g. MR, Spark, Hive, etc.? > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361814#comment-16361814
]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292:
--
[~templedf],
Let me explain a bit:
- Resource profile now can be specified in ContainerRequest:
{code}
public ContainerRequest(Resource capability, String[] nodes, String[] racks,
Priority priority, long allocationRequestId, boolean relaxLocality,
String nodeLabelsExpression,
ExecutionTypeRequest executionTypeRequest, String profile)
{code}
The underlying logic is:
{code}
Resource actual = Resource.clone(profileMap.get(profile));
for (ResourceInformation info : capability.getResourceInformations()) {
if (info.getValue() > 0) {
actual.set(info.getName(), info.getValue());
}
}
// Return actual
{code}
Do you think we should add a "do-not-override" option to ContainerRequest
constructor? Application developer pass a zero capability to use profile
resource, or pass a null profile to use capability. I felt it should be enough.
Since we completely removed profile from ResourceRequest, that means an
application (like MR) doesn't use AMRMClient can implement their own logic to
do override. Do you think should we put the logic to a Util class like
ResourceUtil (Or create a new one like ResourceProfileUtils)?
> Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
> -
>
> Key: YARN-7292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>Reporter: Wangda Tan
>Assignee: Wangda Tan
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch,
> YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch,
> YARN-7292.wip.001.patch
>
>
> Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a
> couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated:
> 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side:
> Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally:
> - Advantages:
> A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t
> change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run
> under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit
> is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing.
> - Disadvantages:
> Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles.
> 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as
> minimum/maximum/default?
> 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should
> client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource
> fields?
> 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should
> send final resource to RM?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361948#comment-16361948 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-7292: --- Thanks [~leftnoteasy]. I am not very sure about that option "do-not-override" is needed, as we have some cleaner option like zero capability from utils (or from server). > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16363561#comment-16363561 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- [~templedf], since this is a blocker of 3.1.0, we want to get this done by Friday, could you help to give some feedbacks. Will commit in 2 days if don't hear from you :). > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365099#comment-16365099
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 4s{color}
| {color:red} YARN-7292 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong Branch?
See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7292 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12910164/YARN-7292.006.patch |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/19699/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
> -
>
> Key: YARN-7292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>Reporter: Wangda Tan
>Assignee: Wangda Tan
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch,
> YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch,
> YARN-7292.wip.001.patch
>
>
> Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a
> couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated:
> 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side:
> Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally:
> - Advantages:
> A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t
> change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run
> under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit
> is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing.
> - Disadvantages:
> Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles.
> 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as
> minimum/maximum/default?
> 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should
> client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource
> fields?
> 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should
> send final resource to RM?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365250#comment-16365250 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Rebased to latest trunk (007) > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.007.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365453#comment-16365453
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
20s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 9 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
58s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 20m
49s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m
40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
16s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 4m
4s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 47s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
16s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 3m
8s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 6m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 4s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 2 new + 319 unchanged - 17 fixed = 321 total (was 336) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 35s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 6m
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 3m
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
7s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
5s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 60m
51s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 27m 54s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 12m
28s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the
patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color}
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365459#comment-16365459
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7292:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
23s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 9 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
10s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
9s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
28s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 30s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
8s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api in
trunk has 1 extant Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
10s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 8m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 3s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 2 new + 319 unchanged - 17 fixed = 321 total (was 336) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
9m 40s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing our
client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 6m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
21s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
27s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 77m 58s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 28m 21s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 12m
52s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the
patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16366545#comment-16366545 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Test failures are not related to the patch. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.007.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16366556#comment-16366556 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-7292: --- +1 committing shortly. > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: YARN-7292.002.patch, YARN-7292.003.patch, > YARN-7292.004.patch, YARN-7292.005.patch, YARN-7292.006.patch, > YARN-7292.007.patch, YARN-7292.wip.001.patch > > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7292) Revisit Resource Profile Behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16197805#comment-16197805 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7292: -- Moved resource-types.xml related behavior changes to YARN-7307 > Revisit Resource Profile Behavior > - > > Key: YARN-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7292 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Wangda Tan >Assignee: Wangda Tan >Priority: Blocker > > Had discussions with [~templedf], [~vvasudev], [~sunilg] offline. There're a > couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated: > 1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side: > Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally: > - Advantages: > A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t > change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run > under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit > is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. > - Disadvantages: > Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles. > 2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as > minimum/maximum/default? > 3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should > client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource > fields? > 4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should > send final resource to RM? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
