[yocto] #yocto #dunfell Console Standard input dirty without "tools-sdk" image feature
Using dunfell 3.1.8 Will post this inquiry while doing my own investigation. When outputting to the debug console that involves standard input(ex. busctl, systemctl status), the output seems misaligned and dirty. But I noticed this can be easily fixed by adding to the "tools-sdk" to the EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES. I'm curious to know what else tools-sdk seems to besides adding development tools(ex. gcc,make) Below is the snapshot when tools-sdk isn't included in the image built -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#54548): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/54548 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/85105833/21656 Mute #yocto:https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/mutehashtag/yocto Mute #dunfell:https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/mutehashtag/dunfell Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [yocto] #yocto Preferred development workflow
sorry about that, right now the config files are placed in the files directory
of the recipe which builds the module.
Sample snippets of the recipe concerning this config file, I removed the rest
of lines.
SRC_URI = " \
file://config.json \
"
do_install_append() {
install -m 0644 ${WORKDIR}/config.json ${D}/etc/directory/
}
If I were to have the config files placed on a separate recipe, would that mean
making multiple of these recipes depending on the number of projects?
I did thought also of adding it in the image recipe but probably this wouldn't
look well if more things get added.
Thanks
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#54107): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/54107
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/84171384/21656
Mute #yocto:https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/mutehashtag/yocto
Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[yocto] #yocto Preferred development workflow
Hi everyone, I'm curious on a good approach when dealing with multiple projects I've just started out yocto and have already created our own meta-layer which contains our modules. Now these modules would sometimes have config files and this could vary when each project that we have would use these recipes. I'm thinking of a way to control this. And I don't think having one branch per project is a good style. Right now the best way I can think of is creating seperate "project layers" (ex. meta-project1, meta-project2) and from there create those .bbappends which would point to the project-specific conf files. But I was wondering if there is a better way of handling it. Thanks. Cheers. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#54105): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/54105 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/84171384/21656 Mute #yocto:https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/mutehashtag/yocto Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
