Re: [yocto] Modifying the OE-internal Python code

2015-10-21 Thread PIEWALD Georg
> Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2015 21:07:15 PIEWALD Georg wrote:
>> I'm trying to do some modifications in the OE-internals (just some personal
>> customizations), in the Python code. In particular, I changed the file
>> oe-core/meta/lib/oe/terminal.py
>> I also compiled it into a terminal.pyc file. However, the modifications
>> don't seem to be picked up by bitbake. Is there something more I have to
>> do? Does the .pyc file have to be installed somewhere?
>
> There should be no need to explicitly build the pyc nor do anything special 
> for any changes to be recognised (assuming you're not using oe-init-build-env-
> memres). Something must be going wrong in your setup somewhere. Perhaps an 
> unusual python path?

Thanks for your answer! I looked at it more careful now, and indeed you are 
right, all changes are recognized implicitly. The problem was in the code that 
I modified, which was a no-op (and I learned something about Python).

BR Georg

-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] Modifying the OE-internal Python code

2015-10-20 Thread PIEWALD Georg
Hi,
I'm trying to do some modifications in the OE-internals (just some personal 
customizations), in the Python code. In particular, I changed the file
oe-core/meta/lib/oe/terminal.py
I also compiled it into a terminal.pyc file. However, the modifications don't 
seem to be picked up by bitbake. Is there something more I have to do? Does the 
.pyc file have to be installed somewhere?

Thanks for any hints,
Georg
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] Selecting a preferred recipe version for devtools

2015-08-13 Thread PIEWALD Georg
Khem Raj  wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:48 AM, PIEWALD Georg
> wrote:
>> PREFERRED_VERSION_subversion = "1.6.15"
>>
>> in my local.conf, but it turned out that this only affects the builds for
>> the target-machine (cortexa8hf-vfp-neon-3.8-oe-linux-gnueabi), but not the
>> devtools on the build-machine (x86_64-linux).
>
> you might need to set preferred version for native extension as well.
> PREFERRED_VERSION_subversion-native = "1.6.15"

That did the trick, thanks a lot!
Georg
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] Selecting a preferred recipe version for devtools

2015-08-12 Thread PIEWALD Georg
Hi all,

I have two recipes for building Subversion (which I only need as a devtool on 
the build-machine):

$ ls oe-core/meta/recipes-devtools/subversion/*.bb
subversion_1.6.15.bb
subversion_1.7.8.bb

Naturally Yocto uses 1.7.8, which is the newer. However, unfortunately I must 
use 1.6.15 on my build machine. How can I instruct Yocto to use the older 
version?

I tried to put a variable
PREFERRED_VERSION_subversion = "1.6.15"
in my local.conf, but it turned out that this only affects the builds for the 
target-machine (cortexa8hf-vfp-neon-3.8-oe-linux-gnueabi), but not the devtools 
on the build-machine (x86_64-linux).

One apparent solution is to simply remove the subversion_1.7.8.bb file, but I'm 
wondering if there is a better way, and how I can select a preferred version 
specifically for devtools.

BR, Georg
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] Devshell configuration

2015-04-01 Thread PIEWALD Georg
Hi,
Is there any way to pre-configure the yocto devshell? I mean settings like the 
following:
* which shell is opened (bash, zsh, etc.), rather than the user's default shell
* disable the fakeroot environment (this bothers me most of all)
* in terminal mode to not open a screen session (often I already run screen and 
i don't want a second session inside)
* to generally pass arguments to the shell when it is started

Ideally I would imagine that I can somewhere configure the exact command that 
is called when I execute "bitbake xxx -c devshell". If that's not possible, can 
I at least change some of the points mentioned above?

Thanks and best regards,
Georg
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] kernel config and meta-altera

2015-02-17 Thread PIEWALD Georg
Hi all,
I'm rather new to the Yocto world so please bear with me. I built a Linux 
kernel using the Altera "Golden System Reference Design" [1], which is a 1GB 
tarball containing all required layers and all source code. Works fine.

Now I'd like to customize the image. Particularly I want to change the kernel 
config to include the xHCI driver as a module [2]. I created a layer containing 
a bbappend-file and a "config fragment" file. No success. Reading tons of 
threads in the mailing list archive I figured that config fragments will not 
work, because apparently the meta-altera layer inherits from "kernel" rather 
than "linux-yocto".

So I tried the "defconfig" way, which I thought should work always. It turned 
out that the defconfig file is correctly picked up and copied to $WORKDIR, but 
simply not applied to .config there. After a long time of searching I figured 
out that linux-altera.inc [3] apparently overwrites the do_configure task and 
ignores any defconfig.

Eventually, the only solution I came up with, was a new task in my bbappend 
file:
  do_change_config() {
  sed -i "s|^.*CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD.*$|CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=m\\n# 
CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD_DEBUGGING is not set|" .config
  }
  addtask change_config before do_compile after do_configure

This works, but I find it somehow ugly. Can you think of a better way to handle 
this? Can I somehow add the "defconfig" or (even better) the "config fragments" 
features to the meta-altera layer?

BR, Georg


[1] http://www.rocketboards.org/foswiki/Documentation/GSRD131YoctoUserManual
[2] CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=m
[3] 
https://github.com/kraj/meta-altera/blob/master/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-altera.inc
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto