Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue
Am 16. Februar 2015 10:18:29 MEZ, schrieb Alexandru Vaduva alexandru.vad...@enea.com: Hello Christopher, Your observation is very accurate. After a quick inspection I observed the following: Inside heartbeat-suse.spec the next information: License:GPL v2 only; LGPL v2.1 or later Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-suse.spec Inside heartbeat-fedora.spec the next information: License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-fedora.spec I added Lars Ellenberg one of the authors behind heartbeat or drbd to the discussion. Hello Lars, sorry for disturbing you but maybe you could help us with our little problem. If anyone from the Yocto Project community has any input on this matter please help. For me at least this problem is not clear. Should the “|” sign remain or should it be replaced with the “” one between the licenses. Thanks guys, Alex Vaduva From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Larson Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 4:01 PM To: Armin Kuster Cc: yocto Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Armin Kuster akuster...@gmail.commailto:akuster...@gmail.com wrote: -LICENSE = GPLv2 LGPLv2+ +LICENSE = GPLv2 | LGPLv2+ Are you sure this is correct? Afaict this is wrong, as there are parts of the source tree under the GPL, and parts under LGPL, which means it's an AND relationship -- both apply, not an OR relationship, where you can choose which to use. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics It is an and. Some parts have been taken from LGPL or dual license whatever/LGPL origin. Some GPL. So it is both, not an option or choice. Which parts are what however I do not know from the top of my head, I'd have to check, if it is relevant to you. Thanks, Lars-- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue
On Monday 16 February 2015 09:18:29 Alexandru Vaduva wrote: After a quick inspection I observed the following: Inside heartbeat-suse.spec the next information: License:GPL v2 only; LGPL v2.1 or later Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-sus e.spec Inside heartbeat-fedora.spec the next information: License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-fed ora.spec I added Lars Ellenberg one of the authors behind heartbeat or drbd to the discussion. Hello Lars, sorry for disturbing you but maybe you could help us with our little problem. If anyone from the Yocto Project community has any input on this matter please help. For me at least this problem is not clear. Should the “|” sign remain or should it be replaced with the “” one between the licenses. What you have found above correlates with what Chris was saying - both licenses apply, therefore you must use . Cheers, Paul From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Larson Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 4:01 PM To: Armin Kuster Cc: yocto Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Armin Kuster akuster...@gmail.commailto:akuster...@gmail.com wrote: -LICENSE = GPLv2 LGPLv2+ +LICENSE = GPLv2 | LGPLv2+ Are you sure this is correct? Afaict this is wrong, as there are parts of the source tree under the GPL, and parts under LGPL, which means it's an AND relationship -- both apply, not an OR relationship, where you can choose which to use. -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue
Ok, Thanks,I will try to do the change accordingly.I spotted a new mistake, this time in one of my patches and I will try to send them both tomorrow for review. On Monday, February 16, 2015 6:31 PM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Monday 16 February 2015 09:18:29 Alexandru Vaduva wrote: After a quick inspection I observed the following: Inside heartbeat-suse.spec the next information: License: GPL v2 only; LGPL v2.1 or later Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-sus e.spec Inside heartbeat-fedora.spec the next information: License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-fed ora.spec I added Lars Ellenberg one of the authors behind heartbeat or drbd to the discussion. Hello Lars, sorry for disturbing you but maybe you could help us with our little problem. If anyone from the Yocto Project community has any input on this matter please help. For me at least this problem is not clear. Should the “|” sign remain or should it be replaced with the “” one between the licenses. What you have found above correlates with what Chris was saying - both licenses apply, therefore you must use . Cheers, Paul From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Larson Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 4:01 PM To: Armin Kuster Cc: yocto Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Armin Kuster akuster...@gmail.commailto:akuster...@gmail.com wrote: -LICENSE = GPLv2 LGPLv2+ +LICENSE = GPLv2 | LGPLv2+ Are you sure this is correct? Afaict this is wrong, as there are parts of the source tree under the GPL, and parts under LGPL, which means it's an AND relationship -- both apply, not an OR relationship, where you can choose which to use. -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue
It should be an (and). I will send a updated patch soon. - armin On 02/16/2015 09:24 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: Am 16. Februar 2015 10:18:29 MEZ, schrieb Alexandru Vaduva alexandru.vad...@enea.com: Hello Christopher, Your observation is very accurate. After a quick inspection I observed the following: Inside heartbeat-suse.spec the next information:License:GPL v2 only; LGPL v2.1 or later Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-suse.spec Inside heartbeat-fedora.spec the next information:License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-fedora.spec I added Lars Ellenberg one of the authors behind heartbeat or drbd to the discussion. Hello Lars, sorry for disturbing you but maybe you could help us with our little problem. If anyone from the Yocto Project community has any input on this matter please help. For me at least this problem is not clear. Should the “|”sign remain or should it be replaced with the “”one between the licenses. Thanks guys, Alex Vaduva *From:*yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Christopher Larson *Sent:* Sunday, February 15, 2015 4:01 PM *To:* Armin Kuster *Cc:* yocto *Subject:* Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Armin Kuster akuster...@gmail.com mailto:akuster...@gmail.com wrote: -LICENSE = GPLv2 LGPLv2+ +LICENSE = GPLv2 | LGPLv2+ Are you sure this is correct? Afaict this is wrong, as there are parts of the source tree under the GPL, and parts under LGPL, which means it's an AND relationship -- both apply, not an OR relationship, where you can choose which to use. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics It is an and. Some parts have been taken from LGPL or dual license whatever/LGPL origin. Some GPL. So it is both, not an option or choice. Which parts are what however I do not know from the top of my head, I'd have to check, if it is relevant to you. Thanks, Lars -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue
Hello Christopher, Your observation is very accurate. After a quick inspection I observed the following: Inside heartbeat-suse.spec the next information: License: GPL v2 only; LGPL v2.1 or later Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-suse.spec Inside heartbeat-fedora.spec the next information: License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ Link here: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat-STABLE_3_0/file/545554f6fc0a/heartbeat-fedora.spec I added Lars Ellenberg one of the authors behind heartbeat or drbd to the discussion. Hello Lars, sorry for disturbing you but maybe you could help us with our little problem. If anyone from the Yocto Project community has any input on this matter please help. For me at least this problem is not clear. Should the “|” sign remain or should it be replaced with the “” one between the licenses. Thanks guys, Alex Vaduva From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Larson Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 4:01 PM To: Armin Kuster Cc: yocto Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Armin Kuster akuster...@gmail.commailto:akuster...@gmail.com wrote: -LICENSE = GPLv2 LGPLv2+ +LICENSE = GPLv2 | LGPLv2+ Are you sure this is correct? Afaict this is wrong, as there are parts of the source tree under the GPL, and parts under LGPL, which means it's an AND relationship -- both apply, not an OR relationship, where you can choose which to use. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Armin Kuster akuster...@gmail.com wrote: -LICENSE = GPLv2 LGPLv2+ +LICENSE = GPLv2 | LGPLv2+ Are you sure this is correct? Afaict this is wrong, as there are parts of the source tree under the GPL, and parts under LGPL, which means it's an AND relationship -- both apply, not an OR relationship, where you can choose which to use. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH] heartbeat: fix license issue
Thank you for the patch.Applied and merged it upstream. On Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:00 AM, Armin Kuster akuster...@gmail.com wrote: From: Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com WARNING: heartbeat: LICENSE value GPLv2 LGPLv2+ has an invalid format - license names must be separated by the following characters to indicate the license selection: |() Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster akus...@mvista.com --- meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/heartbeat/heartbeat_3.0.5.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/heartbeat/heartbeat_3.0.5.bb b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/heartbeat/heartbeat_3.0.5.bb index a866f0f..7ec7c5d 100644 --- a/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/heartbeat/heartbeat_3.0.5.bb +++ b/meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/heartbeat/heartbeat_3.0.5.bb @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ It implements the following kinds of heartbeats: \ HOMEPAGE = http://linux-ha.org/; SECTION = System Environment/Daemons -LICENSE = GPLv2 LGPLv2+ +LICENSE = GPLv2 | LGPLv2+ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = \ file://doc/COPYING;md5=c93c0550bd3173f4504b2cbd8991e50b \ file://doc/COPYING.LGPL;md5=d8045f3b8f929c1cb29a1e3fd737b499 \ -- 1.9.1 -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
