[Zaurus-devel] Event based zaurusd

[Andrea Adami]

Hello,

now that we are running 2.6.38 kernels can we move to the new event
based zaurusd [1]?
Any particular drawback?

Regards

Andrea


[1] http://metan.lindevdoc.org/git/?p=zaurusd.git/.git;a=summary

___
Zaurus-devel mailing list
Zaurus-devel@lists.linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zaurus-devel

Re: [Zaurus-devel] Event based zaurusd

[Andrea Adami]

reading  following lines from linux-arm-kernel [2] I wonder if we
could have zaurusd as driver in kernel tree...


...
 Since this is a one-off kind of thing, a singleton driver that controls
 power, reset and some GPIO on the chip. I contemplate moving the
 stuff to either:

 drivers/misc/ux500/*
 include/linux/misc/ux500/*

 or:

 drivers/platform/arm/ux500/*
 include/linux/platform/arm/ux500/*

 Are any of these generally speaking good ideas?

Or maybe drivers/arm?
...


[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-April/048211.html


Andrea

___
Zaurus-devel mailing list
Zaurus-devel@lists.linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zaurus-devel