Re: [zeromq-dev] Long-term plan for ZeroMQ
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Daniel Truemper wrote: > Maybe a silly question, but if you remove durable sockets, what is the > use case for SWAP? Why not simply remove the SWAP as well? > > Am I getting something wrong here? Hi Daniel, I think Pieter is referring to the fact that SWAP has been removed in 3.x. -- Mikko Koppanen ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
[zeromq-dev] EFSM not always raised in 2.1.8
I upgraded to 2.1.8, and while getting ready to release pyzmq-2.1.8 I discovered a difference in behavior between 2.1.7 and 2.1.8. With a REQ or REP socket, making an inappropriate send or recv raises EFSM. in 2.1.8, doing two in a row will *not* cause this to raise, whereas 2.1.7 will raise on each call. Instead, in 2.1.8 the second call will block. Test case (in C): https://gist.github.com/1114941 Is this the correct behavior? Reproduced on current OSX (10.7) and Ubuntu (11.04). -MinRK ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Long-term plan for ZeroMQ
Hi Pieter, > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Gregg Irwin wrote: >> PH> http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning >> >> Great summary Pieter. Thanks for that, it is most helpful. +1, great write up! Thanks for the insights! > Nice to know. If anyone has questions, please do raise them... The one > thing I know we're missing is a replacement for SWAP. Maybe a silly question, but if you remove durable sockets, what is the use case for SWAP? Why not simply remove the SWAP as well? Am I getting something wrong here? Best, Daniel ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Long-term plan for ZeroMQ
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Gregg Irwin wrote: > PH> http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning > > Great summary Pieter. Thanks for that, it is most helpful. Nice to know. If anyone has questions, please do raise them... The one thing I know we're missing is a replacement for SWAP. -Pieter ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Long-term plan for ZeroMQ
PH> http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning Great summary Pieter. Thanks for that, it is most helpful. -- Gregg ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
[zeromq-dev] Long-term plan for ZeroMQ
Hi all, People have been asking what version of 0MQ to use today. So here's a sketch of the long term plan for 0MQ: http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning Let's discuss this and change as needed. Note that it's as always, everyone's contribution to 0MQ that makes it actually happen. -Pieter ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
