Re: [zeromq-dev] Targeting ZeroMQ Interop (my C# wrapper) at ZeroMQ 2.1.0
> Pieter Hintjens imatix.com> Close enough to official for me. ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Targeting ZeroMQ Interop (my C# wrapper) at ZeroMQ 2.1.0
On 19 February 2011 18:31, Alex Forster wrote: > On Feb 19, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Steven McCoy wrote: > > You can add the MinGW compiler dependencies into MSVC, they're listed here > as libgcc.a libmingwex.a > > > http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/wiki/OpenPgmCReferenceLinkTheseLibraryFiles > > > That's a very helpful page. If I can get my hands on those two I'll give it > another shot. > I bundle 32-bit and 64-bit versions with my old pre-release Windows distribution, I'm not sure how much wiggle room you have on version differences: http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/downloads/detail?name=libpgm-2.1.27-pre1.zip -- Steve-o ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Targeting ZeroMQ Interop (my C# wrapper) at ZeroMQ 2.1.0
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Alex Forster wrote: 2.1.0 is right around the corner! Don't even bother with 2.0.10 anymore. -Pieter ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Targeting ZeroMQ Interop (my C# wrapper) at ZeroMQ 2.1.0
On Feb 19, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Steven McCoy wrote: > You can add the MinGW compiler dependencies into MSVC, they're listed here as > libgcc.a libmingwex.a > > http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/wiki/OpenPgmCReferenceLinkTheseLibraryFiles That's a very helpful page. If I can get my hands on those two I'll give it another shot. > Obviously OpenPGM 5.1 is a lot easier, I even provide a Windows installer so > you don't have to build it yourself. Absolutely. I'm hoping to hear something like "2.1.0 is right around the corner! Don't even bother with 2.0.10 anymore."___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] Targeting ZeroMQ Interop (my C# wrapper) at ZeroMQ 2.1.0
On 19 February 2011 14:27, Alex Forster wrote: > I'm having a hell of a time compiling ZeroMQ 2.0.10 with support for > OpenPGM 2.1.27-pre2. I got it down to 18 linker errors, and then I hit a > wall because those errors are all related to missing MinGW libraries, and > I'm using Visual Studio. My options now are: (1) dump Visual Studio, install > the entire MinGW toolchain, and recompile everything introducing a MinGW > dependency in the process, (2) compile .lib versions of the MinGW libraries > since the dist binaries are all .a, or (3) move my project to ZeroMQ 2.1.0 > which purportedly has ABI stability (very enticing), and support for the > latest version of OpenPGM (thus no dependencies on glib). > > Note I've only ever cross-compiled OpenPGM with MinGW on Ubuntu, I've never tried on Windows in MSYS; Python shitting itself with fork doesn't help trying to do anything with SCons as I found out with the Cygwin port. You can add the MinGW compiler dependencies into MSVC, they're listed here as libgcc.a libmingwex.a http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/wiki/OpenPgmCReferenceLinkTheseLibraryFiles Obviously OpenPGM 5.1 is a lot easier, I even provide a Windows installer so you don't have to build it yourself. -- Steve-o ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
[zeromq-dev] Targeting ZeroMQ Interop (my C# wrapper) at ZeroMQ 2.1.0
I'm having a hell of a time compiling ZeroMQ 2.0.10 with support for OpenPGM 2.1.27-pre2. I got it down to 18 linker errors, and then I hit a wall because those errors are all related to missing MinGW libraries, and I'm using Visual Studio. My options now are: (1) dump Visual Studio, install the entire MinGW toolchain, and recompile everything introducing a MinGW dependency in the process, (2) compile .lib versions of the MinGW libraries since the dist binaries are all .a, or (3) move my project to ZeroMQ 2.1.0 which purportedly has ABI stability (very enticing), and support for the latest version of OpenPGM (thus no dependencies on glib). I've been taking a pretty thorough look at the commit log (https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq2/commits/master/) and at the issue log (https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq2/issues/labels/master) and it seems that 2.1.0 is very stable. I'm looking for (1) a general idea of how far along/stable 2.1.0 is, and (2) some feedback on how wise a decision it is to target my wrapper library at this development version. ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
