Re: [zfs-discuss] mounting during boot
Krzys wrote: ... So my system is booting up and I cannot login. aparently my service: svc:/system/filesystem/local:default went into maitenance mode... somehow system could not mount those two items from vfstab: /d/d2/downloads - /d/d2/web/htdocs/downloads lofs2 yes - /d/d1/home/cw/pics - /d/d2/web/htdocs/pics lofs2 yes - I could not login and do anything, had to login trough console put my service svc:/system/filesystem/local:default out of maitenance mode, clear maitenance state and all my services started to get going and system was no longer in single user mode... That sucks a bit since how can I mount both UFS drives, then mount zfs and then get lofs mountpoints after? ... To resolve your lofs mount issues I think you need to set the mountpoint property for the various fs in the pool. To do that, use the zfs command, eg: # zfs set mountpoint=/d/d2 nameofpool (you didn't actually mention your pool's name). On my system, I have a zfs called inout/kshtest and its mountpoint is $ zfs get mountpoint inout/kshtest NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE inout/kshtestmountpoint /inout/kshtest default You should also have a look at the legacy option in the zfs manpage, which provides more details on how to get zpools and zfs integrated into your system. James C. McPherson -- Solaris kernel software engineer, system admin and troubleshooter http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog Find me on LinkedIn @ http://www.linkedin.com/pub/2/1ab/967 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Re: create ZFS pool(s)/volume(s) during jumpstart
Hello, From a couple of tests I've done (not totally finished yet!), you should look at zpool -R /a option to create zfs pool under /a from a finish script. The mountpoint attribute will be relative to /a. I've done something like when in mini-root (llaunch a ksh from a finish to interactively try things): zpool create -f -R /a myzfspool mirror c0t0d0s5 c0t2d0s5 Then I did a zfs create myzfspool/opt zfs set automountpoint=/opt myzfspool/opt Then, I did zpool export myzfspool After, I wrote a script in /a/etc/rcS.d/S10zfs that is simply: #!/usr/bin/ksh # case $1 in start) /sbin/zpool import -f myzfspool ;; esac I rebooted and I get this: Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on /dev/md/dsk/d0493527 75243 36893217%/ /devices 0 0 0 0%/devices ctfs 0 0 0 0%/system/contract proc 0 0 0 0%/proc mnttab 0 0 0 0%/etc/mnttab swap 1338496 368 1338128 1%/etc/svc/volatile objfs 0 0 0 0%/system/object /dev/md/dsk/d60 4130982 125515 3964158 4%/usr fd 0 0 0 0%/dev/fd /dev/md/dsk/d30 10178315440 951322 1%/var swap 1338128 0 1338128 0%/tmp swap 1338144 16 1338128 1%/var/run myzfspool 70189056 24 70188938 1%/myzfspool myzfspool/opt70189056 24 70188938 1%/opt Hope this helps... Simon. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Comments on a ZFS multiple use of a pool,
Hello Darren, Thursday, September 14, 2006, 5:42:20 PM, you wrote: If you *never* want to import a pool automatically on reboot you just have to delete the /etc/zfs/zpool.cache file before the zfs module is being loaded. This could be integrated into SMF. Or you could always use import -R / create -R for your pool management. Of course, there's no way to set a global default for these, so you have to remember it each time, making the SMF solution more attractive DD Perfect. (although I have to try it). In a cluster framework, the DD cluster can remember to do it each time, so that shouldn't be an issue. And that's exactly what SC32 does. -- Best regards, Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Comments on a ZFS multiple use of a pool, RFE.
Hello James, I belive that storing hostid, etc. in a label and checking if it matches on auto-import is the right solution. Before it's implemented you can use -R right now with home-clusters and don't worry about auto-import. However maybe doing (optional) SCSI reservation on a pool would be a good idea? Of course as an extra switch during/after import. I know not all devices supports it but still. ZFS would allow either reserve all disks in a pool or none. -- Best regards, Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Re: low disk performance
Other test, same setup. SOLARIS10: zpool/a filesystem containing over 10Millions subdirs each containing 10 files of about 1k zpool/b empty filesystem rsync -avx /zpool/a/* /zpool/b time: 14 hours (iostat showing %b = 100 for each lun in the zpool) FreeBSD: /vol1/a dir containing over 10Millions subdirs each containing 10 files of about 1k /vol1/b empty dir rsync -avx /vol1/a/* /vol1/b time: 1h 40m !! Also a zone running on zpool/zone1 was almost completely unusable because of i/o load. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zpool df mypool
in man page it does say zpool df home dows work, when I do type it it does not work and I get the following error: zpool df mypool unrecognized command 'df' usage: zpool command args ... where 'command' is one of the following: create [-fn] [-R root] [-m mountpoint] pool vdev ... destroy [-f] pool add [-fn] pool vdev ... list [-H] [-o field[,field]*] [pool] ... iostat [-v] [pool] ... [interval [count]] status [-vx] [pool] ... online pool device ... offline [-t] pool device ... clear pool [device] attach [-f] pool device new_device detach pool device replace [-f] pool device [new_device] scrub [-s] pool ... import [-d dir] [-D] import [-d dir] [-D] [-f] [-o opts] [-R root] -a import [-d dir] [-D] [-f] [-o opts] [-R root ] pool | id [newpool] export [-f] pool ... upgrade upgrade -v upgrade -a | pool I am running Solaris 10 Update 2. Is my man page out of date or is my zfs not up to date? Thanks. Chris ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: low disk performance
That is bad such a big time difference... 14rs vs less than 2 hrs... did you have the same hardware setup? I did not follow up the thread... Chris On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Gino Ruopolo wrote: Other test, same setup. SOLARIS10: zpool/a filesystem containing over 10Millions subdirs each containing 10 files of about 1k zpool/b empty filesystem rsync -avx /zpool/a/* /zpool/b time: 14 hours (iostat showing %b = 100 for each lun in the zpool) FreeBSD: /vol1/a dir containing over 10Millions subdirs each containing 10 files of about 1k /vol1/b empty dir rsync -avx /vol1/a/* /vol1/b time: 1h 40m !! Also a zone running on zpool/zone1 was almost completely unusable because of i/o load. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss !DSPAM:122,450da906299689287932! ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
