[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Metadata corrupted
Yeah, good catch. So this means that it seems to be able to read the label off of each device OK, and the labels look good. I'm not sure what else would cause us to be unable to open the pool... Can you try running 'zpool status -v'? The command seems to return the same thing: % zpool status -v pool: tank state: FAULTED status: The pool metadata is corrupted and the pool cannot be opened. action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-CS scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM tankFAULTED 0 0 6 corrupted data raidz ONLINE 0 0 6 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 I can provide you with SSH access if you want. Thanks, Siegfried This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: A versioning FS
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 00:07 -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: Some people are making money on the concept, so I suppose there are those who perceive benefits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_ClearCase (I dimly remember DSEE on the Apollos; ...) I used both fairly extensively. Much of the apollo DSEE team left HP to write ClearCase. Neither are versioning filesystems; instead, both are software configuration management systems which export a limited virtual filesystem interface. With such systems, versioning is not transparent but instead involves interaction with a CLI or GUI around checkout/checkin. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] ZFS file system create/export question
Hi, I am wandering HOW ZFS ensures that a storage pool isn't imported by two machines at one time? Does it stamp the disks the hostID or hostName? Below is a snipplet from the ZFS Admin Guide. It appears that this can be overwritten with import -f. importing a pool that is currently in use by another system over a storage network can result in data corruption and panics as both systems attempt to write to the same storage. ljs This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool import fails
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: While trouble shooting a full-disk scenario I booted from DVD after adding two new disks. Still under DVD boot I created a pool from those two disks and moved iso images I had downloaded to the zfs filesystem. Next I fixed my grub, exported the zpool and rebooted. Now zpool import comes up empty. Have I lost all my data on that ZFS? How can I check? Sorry if I'm stating something too basic here -- no insult intended It sounds like the on-disk Solaris isn't aware of the new drives. Did you do a reconfigure-boot after adding them? Do they show up as configured in a cfgadm -al list? Regards, Marion ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool import fails
On Oct 10, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Marion Hakanson wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: While trouble shooting a full-disk scenario I booted from DVD after addingtwo new disks. Still under DVD boot I created a pool from those two disksand moved iso images I had downloaded to the zfs filesystem. Next I fixedmy grub, exported the zpool and rebooted. Now zpool import comes up empty. Have I lost all my data on that ZFS? Howcan I check? Sorry if I'm stating something too basic here -- no insult intendedno problem :)It sounds like the on-disk Solaris isn't aware of the new drives. Did youdo a reconfigure-boot after adding them? Do they show up as "configured"in a "cfgadm -al" list?I can see and access the disks with prtvtoc. cfgadm returnscfgadm: Configuration administration not supported --Jan Hendrik Mangold Sun Microsystems650-585-5484 (x81371)"idle hands are the developers workshop" ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] ZFS Inexpensive SATA Whitebox
All, So I have started working with Solaris 10 at work a bit (I'm a Linux guy by trade) and I have a dying nfs box at home. So the long and short of it is as follows: I would like to setup a SATAII whitebox that uses ZFS as its filesystem. The box will probably be very lightly used, streaming media to my laptop and workstation would be the bulk of the work. However I do have quite a good deal of data, roughly 400G. So what I would like to know is what hardware solutions work best for this ? I dont need to have 2TB of storage on day one, but I might need it sometime down the road. I would prefer to keep the price low(400 - 600), but I dont buy house brand motherboard, or controllers either. So who makes a native supported board, controller (pci-e ?), gigE card and so on. I have a DVD+_RW made by samsung which I would imagine would work. Any assistance is welcomed and appreciated. Regards. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
