[zfs-discuss] How to get rid of phantom pool ?
I had a pool on external drive.Recently the drive failed,but pool still shows up when run 'zpoll status' Any attempt to remove/delete/export pool ends up with unresponsiveness(The system is still up/running perfectly,it's just this specific command kind of hangs so I have to open new ssh session) zpool status shows state: UNAVAIL When try zpool clear get "cannot clear errors for backup: I/O error" Please help me out to get rid of this phantom pool. Many,many thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Please help destroy pool.
Thanks Cindy, I just needed to delete all luns before sbdadm delete-lu 600144F00800270514BC4C1E29FB0001 itadm delete-target -f iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:f38e0b34-be30-ca29-dfbd-d1d28cd75502 And then I was able to destroy ZFS system itself. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris startup script location
Thanks.Everything is clear now. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris startup script location
Thanks...Now I think I understand... Let me summarize it andd let me know if I'm wrong. Disabling ZIL converts all synchronous calls to asynchronous which makes ZSF to report data acknowledgment before it actually was written to stable storage which in turn improves performance but might cause data corruption in case of server crash. Is it correct ? In my case I'm having serious performance issues with NFS over ZFS. My NFS Client is ESXi so the major question is there risk of corruption for VMware images if I disable ZIL ? Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris startup script location
Any argumentation why ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Solaris startup script location
Is there any way run start-up script before non-root pool is mounted ? For example I'm trying to use ramdisk as ZIL device (ramdiskadm ) So I need to create ramdisk before actual pool is mounted otherwise it complains that log device is missing :) For sure I can manually remove/and add it by script and put the script in regular rc2.d location...I'm just looking for more elegant way to it. Thanks a lot. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Please help destroy pool.
I have a pool with zvolume (Opensolaris b134) When I try zpool destroy tank I get "pool is busy" # zpool destroy -f tank cannot destroy 'tank': pool is busy When I try destroy zvolume first I get " dataset is busy" # zfs destroy -f tank/macbook0-data cannot destroy 'tank/macbook0-data': dataset is busy zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT tank/fs1134K 16.7T 44.7K /tank/fs1 tank/fs2135K 16.7T 44.7K /tank/fs2 tank/macbook0-data 4.13T 20.3T 522G - tank/fs3 145G 16.7T 145G /tank/fs3 What next should I try ? Please help. Thanks in advance. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Reconfigure zpool
Thank you very much for the answer Yea,that what I was afraid of. There is something I really cannot understand about zpool structuring... What is a role these 4 drives play in that tank pool with current configuration ? If they are not part of raidz3 array what is a point for Solaris to accept that configuration ? I realize that I made mistake by doing 'zpool add' instead of 'zpool attach',but still... Like let's say I write data into the tank pool.How would the data to be distributed on the pool ? Would it go to raidz3 part of it AND to 4 stand alone drives or to raidz3 part only ? If it goes to raidz3 part only why it's not possible to remove these 4 drives from the pool ? Also could you please provide some examples for multiple raidz vdevs ? I'm really new in ZFS world :) Again thank you very much. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Reconfigure zpool
I have zpool like that pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM tankONLINE 0 0 0 raidz3-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___vc7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0ONLINE 0 0 0 In my understanding last 4 drives(c7t4d0,c7t5d0,c7t6d0,c7t7d0) are part of tank zpool but not of raidz3 array. Ho do I move them to be part of raidz3 ? Thanks a lot. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Help identify failed drive
This is a situation: I've got an error on one of the drives in 'zpool status' output: zpool status tank pool: tank state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors using 'zpool clear' or replace the device with 'zpool replace'. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM tankONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 1 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 So I would like to replace 'c2t3d0'. I know for a fact the pool has 7 physical drives : 5 of Seagate and 2 of WD. I want to know if 'c2t3d0' Seagate or WD. If I run 'iostat -En' it shows that all c*t*d0 drives are Seagate and sd11/sd12 are WD. This totally confuses me... Why there are two different types of drives in iostat output : c*t*d0 and sd* ??? How come all c*t*d0 appear as Seagate.I know for sure two of them are WD. Why WD drives appears as sd* and not as c*t*d0 ? Please help. -- # iostat -En c1t1d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 54 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t0d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t1d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t2d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t3d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 9 Transport Errors: 9 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 7 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 2 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t4d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t5d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t6d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t7d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3500320AS Revision: SD15 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 [b]sd11 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: WDC WD5001AALS-0 Revision: 1D05 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 sd12 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: WDC WD5001AALS-0 Revision: 0K05 Serial No: Size: 500.11GB <500107862016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0[/b] Thanks a lot. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Help destroying phantom clone (zfs filesystem)
It looks like I have some leftovers of old clones that I cannot delete: Clone name is tank/WinSrv/Latest I'm trying: zfs destroy -f -R tank/WinSrv/Latest cannot unshare 'tank/WinSrv/Latest': path doesn't exist: unshare(1M) failed Please help me to get rid of this garbage. Thanks a lot. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
