Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-04 Thread Bohdan Tashchuk
 Where can I find a list of these?

This leads to the more generic question of: where are *any* release notes?

I saw on Genunix that Community Edition 3.0.3 was replaced by 3.0.3-1. What 
changed? I  went to nexenta.org and looked around. But it wasn't immediately 
obvious where to find release notes. Also, as Tim Cook noted, the Nexenta 
forums aren't exactly lively.

For a simple, easily understood and easily navigated web site, you can't beat 
www.openbsd.org. Both Sun/Oracle and Nexenta could learn a lot from it. And I 
can also follow very clean, simple instructions for running the stable 
OpenBSD branch (which is mostly security fixes).
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Case study/recommended ZFS setup for home file

2008-07-09 Thread Bohdan Tashchuk
Thank you for starting this thread. I hope you get some good feedback.

Your questions are quite frequently asked in this forum, but I'm very
interested in the topic. Anway, the best answer varies from month
to month. So I hope you get some good feedback.

 I cannot use OpenSolaris 2008.05 since it does not
 recognize the SATA disks attached to the southbridge.
 A fix for this problem went into build 93.

Which forum/mailing list discusses SATA issues like the above?

Thanks
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] confusion and frustration with zpool

2008-07-07 Thread Bohdan Tashchuk
 However, my pool is not behaving well.  I have had
 insufficient replicas for the pool and corrupted
 data for the mirror piece that is on both the USB
 drives.

I'm learining about ZFS for the same reason, I want a reliable home server. So 
I've been reading the archives. In March 2007 there was a thread titled

 ZFS and Firewire/USB enclosures

the conclusion was that USB had problems because of the following open bug

 6424510 usb ignores DKIOCFLUSHWRITECACHE

From what I can tell this bug is still not fixed

 http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6424510

So, help me out here. Can USB be relied on in Solaris? Maybe the original 
poster is hitting this bug?
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss