Re: [zfs-discuss] New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-09-08 Thread Diego Righi
ok, for the sake of science (!!!), I've turned upside down 4 disks, and took 
mandatory pics:
http://img465.imageshack.us/my.php?image=zfspr0nserver11nf5.jpg
http://img465.imageshack.us/my.php?image=zfspr0nserver12nw8.jpg
http://img482.imageshack.us/my.php?image=zfspr0nserver13mj8.jpg
http://img465.imageshack.us/my.php?image=zfspr0nserver14sw7.jpg
http://img465.imageshack.us/my.php?image=zfspr0nserver15tu9.jpg
the rerouting of the power cables was a bit of a pain, but all in all it was 
easy and I'm happy it all went well:
[vintage.sick-net]# zpool status
  pool: vintage
 state: ONLINE
 scrub: none requested
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
vintage ONLINE   0 0 0
  raidz2ONLINE   0 0 0
c2d0ONLINE   0 0 0
c3d0ONLINE   0 0 0
c4d0ONLINE   0 0 0
c5d0ONLINE   0 0 0
c6d0ONLINE   0 0 0
c6d1ONLINE   0 0 0
c7d0ONLINE   0 0 0
c7d1ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

anyway, I don't know if the little recurring armonic noise it produced 
lowered, too much ambient noise now, I'll post again after having heard it at 
night ;P
bye
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-09-07 Thread Diego Righi
I've seen the page with the pics of that server, and I agree with this issue.
So I'd like to try to reverse half of the disks too, how would you advice to do 
this?
My current setup is as follows, where up is normal disk upside paced, and down 
is with upside plate down and electronics side up:
up
up
up
up
up
up
up
up

would it be better to do this:
up
down
up
down
up
down
up
down

or this:
up
up
up
up
down
down
down
down

or maybe this?
up
up
down
down
up
up
down
down

(about the spinning/moving thing: the blue wires are *tight*, and the disk 
doesn't spin like a washing machine anyway... I understand this issue, but I 
prefer silence and slightly moving/pronetobreaking disks than noise, with a 
raidz2 setup, I just hope they don't fail on me more than 2 at a time =)
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-09-06 Thread Diego Righi
Unfortunately it only comes with 4 adapters, bare metal adapters without any 
dampering /silencing and so on...
...anyway I wanted to make it the most silent I could, so I suspeded all the 10 
disks (8 sata 320gb and a little 2,5 pata root disk) with a flexible wire, 
like I posted in this italian forum, the page is in italian, but the pictures 
show the concept well enough:
http://www.pcsilenzioso.it/forum/showthread.php?t=2397
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-09-05 Thread Diego Righi
The case is a Sharkoon Rebel9 (Economy edition, has no integrated fans), I 
bought it from an italian online store, and I think it's commercialized in 
Germany, it has 9 51/4 frontal slots
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Re: While we're sharing server info...

2007-05-22 Thread Diego Righi
So, since you are using the ahci driver, does your cfgadm output show sata 
devices too? =)
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-05-21 Thread Diego Righi
It's not easy to retry now because the 4 disks attached to the sil3114 
controller are half of the raidz2 mirror... but in the previous home server 
that I had, this controller had 3 * 320gb disks attached to it where I had a 
raidz1 pool.
With dclarke's test it easily got 50MB/s in the first (mad :) writing test.
So I think it's pretty fast for the price and for the fact that's sata 1.0 and 
pci33 (those little no-brand cards are the cheapest you can find online or at 
local computer fairs)
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Re: New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-05-20 Thread Diego Righi
The onboard one is the controller that's in the nVidia 430 south bridge:
pci bus 0x cardnum 0x0e function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0266
 nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller

pci bus 0x cardnum 0x0f function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0267
 nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller

The other one is a no-brand 4 port sil3114 pci sata 1.0 controller that I 
bought at a local computer fair last september:
pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x07 function 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3114
 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3114 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller

Notice that I had to flash it to make it work like a regular plain ide 
controller, otherwise it always kept the disks for himself presenting to me 
only the logical raid created drive...
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-05-19 Thread Diego Righi
Hi all, I just built a new zfs server for home and, being a long time and avid 
reader of this forum, I'm going to post my config specs and my benchmarks 
hoping this could be of some help for others :)

http://www.sickness.it/zfspr0nserver.jpg
http://www.sickness.it/zfspr0nserver.txt
http://www.sickness.it/zfspr0nserver.png
http://www.sickness.it/zfspr0nserver.pdf

Correct me if I'm wrong: from the benchmark results, I understand that this 
setup is slow at writing, but fast at reading (and this is perfect for my 
usage, copying large files once and then accessing only to read them). It also 
seems that at 128kb it gives the best performances, iirc due to the zfs stripe 
size (again, correct me if I'm wrong :).

I'd happily try any other test, but if you suggest bonnie++ please tell me 
what's the right version to use, too much of them I really can't understand 
which to try!

tnx :)
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss