Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool list vs zfs list, size differs...
Tomas Ögren wrote: On 07 February, 2009 - Johan Andersson sent me these 1,5K bytes: Hi, New to OpenSolaris and ZFS... Wondering about a size difference I see on my newly installed OpenSolaris system, Homebuilt AMD Phenom system with SATA3 disks... [code] jo...@krynn:~$ zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT rpool 696G 7.67G 688G 1% ONLINE - zpool 2.72T 135K 2.72T 0% ONLINE - The pool has disks that can hold ... 4*7500/1024/1024/1024/1024 =~ 2.72TB jo...@krynn:~$ zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool 11.5G 674G 72K /rpool rpool/ROOT 3.78G 674G 18K legacy rpool/ROOT/opensolaris 3.78G 674G 3.65G / rpool/dump 3.87G 674G 3.87G - rpool/export 18.7M 674G 19K /export rpool/export/home 18.7M 674G 50K /export/home rpool/export/home/admin 18.6M 674G 18.6M /export/home/admin rpool/swap 3.87G 677G 16K - zpool 94.3K 2.00T 26.9K /zpool In that pool, due to raidz, you can store about ... 3*7500/1024/1024/1024/1024 =~ 2TB The disks are all 750GB SATA3 disks, why is zpool listing the raidz zpool as 2.74TB but zfs list the /zpool filesys as 2.0TB? Is this a limit of my server in some way or something I can "tune" up? Space worth about 1x750GB is lost to parity with raidz.. /Tomas Thanks, I didnt realize that the pool counted in the parity data... I should have though... if I had bothered to calc it *duh* /Johan A ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zpool list vs zfs list, size differs...
Hi, New to OpenSolaris and ZFS... Wondering about a size difference I see on my newly installed OpenSolaris system, Homebuilt AMD Phenom system with SATA3 disks... [code] jo...@krynn:~$ zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT rpool 696G 7.67G 688G 1% ONLINE - zpool 2.72T 135K 2.72T 0% ONLINE - jo...@krynn:~$ zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool 11.5G 674G 72K /rpool rpool/ROOT 3.78G 674G 18K legacy rpool/ROOT/opensolaris 3.78G 674G 3.65G / rpool/dump 3.87G 674G 3.87G - rpool/export 18.7M 674G 19K /export rpool/export/home 18.7M 674G 50K /export/home rpool/export/home/admin 18.6M 674G 18.6M /export/home/admin rpool/swap 3.87G 677G 16K - zpool 94.3K 2.00T 26.9K /zpool jo...@krynn:~$ zpool status pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c3d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: zpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zpool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors [/code] The disks are all 750GB SATA3 disks, why is zpool listing the raidz zpool as 2.74TB but zfs list the /zpool filesys as 2.0TB? Is this a limit of my server in some way or something I can "tune" up? /Johan A ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
