Re: [zfs-discuss] Compatibility of Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 HDS723030ALA640 with ZFS
> -Original Message- > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Brandon High > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:28 PM > To: Koopmann, Jan-Peter > Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; luis Johnstone > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Compatibility of Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 > HDS723030ALA640 with ZFS > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Koopmann, Jan-Peter pe...@koopmann.eu> wrote: > > Do you or anyone else have experience with the 3TB 5K3000 drives > > (namely HDS5C3030ALA630)? I am thinking of replacing my current 4*1TB > > drives with 4*3TB drives (home server). Any issues with TER or alike? > > I have been using 8 x 3TB 5k3000 in a raidz2 for about a year without issue. > > The Deskstar 3TB come off the same production line as the Ultrastar 5k3000. I > would avoid the 2TB and smaler 5k3000 - They come off a separate > production line. > > -B > > -- > Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com > ___ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss We have been using around 24 of these on our backup targets for approximately 9 months without issue. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device
> -Original Message- > From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [mailto:r...@karlsbakk.net] > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 1:41 PM > To: Jordan McQuown > Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device > > > zpool remove storage c4t11d0 > > Can you pastebin 'zpool status' as well? > > PS: Get a decent email client - your quoting is severely broken :P > > Vennlige hilsener / Best regards > > roy > -- > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > (+47) 97542685 > r...@karlsbakk.net > http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ > -- > I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er > et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av > idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate > og relevante synonymer på norsk. http://pastebin.com/nD2r2qmh Here is zpool status and zpool version Thanks, Jordan ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device
-Original Message- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [mailto:r...@karlsbakk.net] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 1:14 PM To: Jordan McQuown Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Phillip Steinbachs Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device > I have a pool that is experiencing the same problem (currently at > version 26). I've been able to remove zil devices from it before but > at some point they become "stuck". The zpool remove command completes > with no error, but the device is never really removed and remains in > the pool. > zpool iostat will show no activity to the device however, and the > alloc column shows 16.0E. It is possible to do a zpool replace on the > device, but the replacing device will end up in the same state > (unusable and unable to be removed). I had a similar problem that turned out to be a PEBKAC - I tried to remove devices in a mirror, not the mirror with the devices... Can you paste the command(s) you're using for this? Btw, log device removal is in from zpool v19, so the one you're using should work. Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk. zpool remove storage c4t11d0 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device
-Original Message- From: Phillip Steinbachs [mailto:p...@steinbachs.org] Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 4:01 PM To: Jordan McQuown Cc: 'zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org' Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Jordan McQuown wrote: > The pool was originally created on 2008.11 then upgraded to 2009.06 and again > upgraded to snv-134. Originally I was using Intel x25e's as the zil but > recently purchased a zeusRAM and when trying to remove the Intel I issue the > zpool remove command and it appears to work. Yet when I do a zpool status the > Intel device is still a pool member. Any thoughts? > I have a pool that is experiencing the same problem (currently at version 26). I've been able to remove zil devices from it before but at some point they become "stuck". The zpool remove command completes with no error, but the device is never really removed and remains in the pool. zpool iostat will show no activity to the device however, and the alloc column shows 16.0E. It is possible to do a zpool replace on the device, but the replacing device will end up in the same state (unusable and unable to be removed). -phillip I've also tried replacing and removing the replacing device with no luck. I'm able to remove the zeusRAM without issue which seems rather puzzling. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device
From: Erik Trimble [mailto:erik.trim...@oracle.com] Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 12:53 PM To: Jordan McQuown Cc: 'zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org' Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device On 3/27/2011 7:48 AM, Jordan McQuown wrote: The pool was originally created on 2008.11 then upgraded to 2009.06 and again upgraded to snv-134. Originally I was using Intel x25e's as the zil but recently purchased a zeusRAM and when trying to remove the Intel I issue the zpool remove command and it appears to work. Yet when I do a zpool status the Intel device is still a pool member. Any thoughts? ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org<mailto:zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss Did you remember to upgrade the pool itself? Not just the OS, but the pool, too, need to be upgraded. You'll need to run a 'zpool upgrade' on the pool with the log device. Only later versions of ZFS supported removal of the ZIL. IIRC, the zpool version supported by 2008.11 definitely didn't, and I'm pretty sure the 2009.06 version didn't either, but b134 definitely does. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA I've tried on pool version 22 and 26 at this point under openindiana. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Cannot remove zil device
The pool was originally created on 2008.11 then upgraded to 2009.06 and again upgraded to snv-134. Originally I was using Intel x25e's as the zil but recently purchased a zeusRAM and when trying to remove the Intel I issue the zpool remove command and it appears to work. Yet when I do a zpool status the Intel device is still a pool member. Any thoughts? ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Looking for 3.5" SSD for ZIL
Does anyone have a contact from whom I could purchase an STEC SSD? Thank you, Jordan From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] on behalf of Saxon, Will [will.sa...@sage.com] Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 7:16 PM To: Stephan Budach; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Looking for 3.5" SSD for ZIL > -Original Message- > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Stephan Budach > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:37 AM > To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: [zfs-discuss] Looking for 3.5" SSD for ZIL > > Hello all, > > I am shopping around for 3.5" SSDs that I can mount into my storage and use > as ZIL drives. > As of yet, I have only found 3.5" models with the Sandforce 1200, which was > not recommended on this list. > Does anyone maybe know of a model that has the Sandforce 1500 and is > 3.5"? Or any other 3.5" SSD that he/she can recommend? I have not personally used one, but I have received recommendations for the STEC ZeusRAM. It is a 3.5" SAS RAM-based, flash-backed SSD. I was quoted a shade under $3K USD for an 8GB unit. My understanding is that these have to be ordered through an integrator and there is a significant lead time. There are 2.5->3.5 adapter shells that you should be able to use for any/all of the 2.5" SSDs on the market. -Will ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] 1tb SATA drives
I'm curious to know what other people are running for HD's in white box systems? I'm currently looking at Seagate Barracuda's and Hitachi Deskstars. I'm looking at the 1tb models. These will be attached to an LSI expander in a sc847e2 chassis driven by an LSI 9211-8i HBA. This system will be used as a large storage array for backups and archiving. Thanks, Jordan ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
