Re: [zfs-discuss] pkg image-update to snv 121 -> shouldn't ZFS version be upgraded on /rpool

[Per Öberg]

Thanks for all the answers, I've now cleared out the old BEs and upgraded the 
pools and everything just works as expected.

/Per
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] pkg image-update to snv 121 -> shouldn't ZFS version be upgraded on /rpool

[Per Öberg]

When I check 
--
# pfexec zpool status rpool
  pool: rpool
 state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format.  The pool can
still be used, but some features are unavailable.
action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'.  Once this is done, the
pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions.
 scrub: none requested
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool   ONLINE   0 0 0
  c8t0d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors
--
Shouldn't the image-update take care of that ?
And is it safe to do an upgrade ?

/Per
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] Re: Solaris Backup Server

[Per Öberg]

I'm using a ZFS/Solaris Samba share and use "MS SyncToy" to schedule backups. 
Works fine for me.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss