Hi,

I've got a 10-disk raidz2 zpool with a dead drive (it's actually been 
physically removed from the server pending replacement).

This is how it looks:

# zpool status space
   pool: space
  state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is 
missing or
         invalid.  Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue
         functioning in a degraded state.
action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'.
    see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-4J
  scrub: resilver completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Tue Apr  1 
15:08:29 2008
config:

         NAME                      STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
         space                     DEGRADED     0     0     0
           raidz2                  DEGRADED     0     0     0
             c2t2d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             c2t3d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             c0t0d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             c0t1d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             c0t2d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             17557252296421049869  FAULTED      0     0     0  was 
/dev/dsk/c2t3d0s0
             c0t4d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             c0t5d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             c0t6d0                ONLINE       0     0     0
             c0t7d0                ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors



When I try and run a scrub it seems that a resilver is run instead of a 
scrub, and the resilver finishes almost immediately (as you can see from 
the "scrub: " line above.

Is this normal behaviour? Or is something somewhat crook with my zpool?

What's going on with that long disk name (formerly c2t3d0s0) ?

When I replace the failed disk (in the same port) will it be added to 
the array automatically, or will I have to add it manually (zpool replace) ?

Thanks,

R.

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to