Re: [zfs-discuss] can't import zpool after upgrade to solaris 10u6
There's definately something strange going on as these are the only uberblocks I can find by scanning /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 - nothing to conflict with my theory so far: TXG: 106052 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:12 BLK: 0e29000 (14848000) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 106052 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:12 BLK: 0e69000 (15110144) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 106053 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:42 BLK: 0e29400 (14849024) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 106053 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:42 BLK: 0e69400 (1568) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) skipped 248 blocks... TXG: 114710 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:14:10 BLK: 0e1d800 (14800896) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 114710 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:14:10 BLK: 0e5d800 (15063040) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 114715 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:15:41 BLK: 0e1ec00 (14806016) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 114715 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:15:41 BLK: 0e5ec00 (15068160) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 1830158 TIME: 2008-11-20:08:46:41 BLK: 0023800 (145408) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1830158 TIME: 2008-11-20:08:46:41 BLK: 0063800 (407552) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1830382 TIME: 2008-11-20:09:05:20 BLK: 003b800 (243712) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1830382 TIME: 2008-11-20:09:05:20 BLK: 007b800 (505856) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) skipped 248 blocks... TXG: 1832026 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:18 BLK: 0036800 (223232) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1832026 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:18 BLK: 0076800 (485376) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1832027 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:19 BLK: 0036c00 (224256) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1832027 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:19 BLK: 0076c00 (486400) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) # zdb -l /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 LABEL 0 version=4 name='zpool' state=0 txg=1809157 pool_guid=17419375665629462002 top_guid=12174008987990077602 guid=12174008987990077602 vdev_tree type='disk' id=0 guid=12174008987990077602 path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' whole_disk=0 metaslab_array=14 metaslab_shift=30 ashift=9 asize=129904410624 DTL=24 LABEL 1 version=4 name='zpool' state=0 txg=1809157 pool_guid=17419375665629462002 top_guid=12174008987990077602 guid=12174008987990077602 vdev_tree type='disk' id=0 guid=12174008987990077602 path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' whole_disk=0 metaslab_array=14 metaslab_shift=30 ashift=9 asize=129904410624 DTL=24 LABEL 2 LABEL 3 -Steve After having a think I've come up with the following hypothesis: 1) When I was on Solaris 10u4 things were working fine. 2) When I re-installed with Solaris 10u6 and imported the zpool (with zpool import -f), it created a zpool.cache file and didn't update the on disk data structures for some reason. 3) When I re-installed Solaris 10u6, I lost the zpool.cache file and now zfs looks at the data structures on the disk and they are inconsistent. Could the above have actually happened? It would explain what I'm seeing. -Steve -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] can't import zpool after upgrade to solaris 10u6
Hi Gold, 9987988 sounds factual to me... IMHO, z - Original Message - From: Steve Goldthorpe s...@waistcoat.org.uk To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 6:59 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] can't import zpool after upgrade to solaris 10u6 There's definately something strange going on as these are the only uberblocks I can find by scanning /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 - nothing to conflict with my theory so far: TXG: 106052 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:12 BLK: 0e29000 (14848000) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 106052 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:12 BLK: 0e69000 (15110144) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 106053 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:42 BLK: 0e29400 (14849024) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 106053 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:42 BLK: 0e69400 (1568) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) skipped 248 blocks... TXG: 114710 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:14:10 BLK: 0e1d800 (14800896) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 114710 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:14:10 BLK: 0e5d800 (15063040) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 114715 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:15:41 BLK: 0e1ec00 (14806016) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 114715 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:15:41 BLK: 0e5ec00 (15068160) VER: 10 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) TXG: 1830158 TIME: 2008-11-20:08:46:41 BLK: 0023800 (145408) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1830158 TIME: 2008-11-20:08:46:41 BLK: 0063800 (407552) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1830382 TIME: 2008-11-20:09:05:20 BLK: 003b800 (243712) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1830382 TIME: 2008-11-20:09:05:20 BLK: 007b800 (505856) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) skipped 248 blocks... TXG: 1832026 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:18 BLK: 0036800 (223232) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1832026 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:18 BLK: 0076800 (485376) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1832027 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:19 BLK: 0036c00 (224256) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) TXG: 1832027 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:19 BLK: 0076c00 (486400) VER: 4 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) # zdb -l /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 LABEL 0 version=4 name='zpool' state=0 txg=1809157 pool_guid=17419375665629462002 top_guid=12174008987990077602 guid=12174008987990077602 vdev_tree type='disk' id=0 guid=12174008987990077602 path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' whole_disk=0 metaslab_array=14 metaslab_shift=30 ashift=9 asize=129904410624 DTL=24 LABEL 1 version=4 name='zpool' state=0 txg=1809157 pool_guid=17419375665629462002 top_guid=12174008987990077602 guid=12174008987990077602 vdev_tree type='disk' id=0 guid=12174008987990077602 path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' whole_disk=0 metaslab_array=14 metaslab_shift=30 ashift=9 asize=129904410624 DTL=24 LABEL 2 LABEL 3 -Steve After having a think I've come up with the following hypothesis: 1) When I was on Solaris 10u4 things were working fine. 2) When I re-installed with Solaris 10u6 and imported the zpool (with zpool import -f), it created a zpool.cache file and didn't update the on disk data structures for some reason. 3) When I re-installed Solaris 10u6, I lost the zpool.cache file and now zfs looks at the data structures on the disk and they are inconsistent. Could the above have actually happened? It would explain what I'm seeing. -Steve -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] can't import zpool after upgrade to solaris 10u6
After having a think I've come up with the following hypothesis: 1) When I was on Solaris 10u4 things were working fine. 2) When I re-installed with Solaris 10u6 and imported the zpool (with zpool import -f), it created a zpool.cache file and didn't update the on disk data structures for some reason. 3) When I re-installed Solaris 10u6, I lost the zpool.cache file and now zfs looks at the data structures on the disk and they are inconsistent. Could the above have actually happened? It would explain what I'm seeing. -Steve -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] can't import zpool after upgrade to solaris 10u6
Here's what I did: * had a t1000 with a zpool under /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 on solaris 10u4 * re-installed with solaris 10u6 (disk layout unchanged) * imported zpool with zpool import -f (I'm forever forgetting to export them first) - this was ok * re-installed with solaris 10u6 and more up-to-date patches (again forgetting to export it) When I do zpool import i get the following: # zpool import pool: zpool id: 17419375665629462002 state: FAULTED status: The pool metadata is corrupted. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. The pool may be active on another system, but can be imported using the '-f' flag. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-72 config: zpool FAULTED corrupted data c0t0d0s7 ONLINE So I thought I'd done something wrong, however checked the partition layout and it's not changed. However after doing a bit of poking about, I've found some weird stuff - what zdb -l is showing and what's actually on the disk doesn't seem to tally - I can't find that transaction ID from zdb and there seems to be a mixture of version 4 and version 10 uberblocks on disk (and they all have bigger transaction IDs than zdb is showing). Am I missing something? -Steve # zdb -l /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 LABEL 0 version=4 name='zpool' state=0 txg=1809157 pool_guid=17419375665629462002 top_guid=12174008987990077602 guid=12174008987990077602 vdev_tree type='disk' id=0 guid=12174008987990077602 path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' whole_disk=0 metaslab_array=14 metaslab_shift=30 ashift=9 asize=129904410624 DTL=24 LABEL 1 version=4 name='zpool' state=0 txg=1809157 pool_guid=17419375665629462002 top_guid=12174008987990077602 guid=12174008987990077602 vdev_tree type='disk' id=0 guid=12174008987990077602 path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' whole_disk=0 metaslab_array=14 metaslab_shift=30 ashift=9 asize=129904410624 DTL=24 LABEL 2 LABEL 3 -- (sample output from a little script i knocked up) Uberblock Offset: 002 (131072) Uber version: 4 Transaction group: 1831936 Timestamp: 2008-11-20:11:14:49 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 Uberblock Offset: 0020400 (132096) Uber version: 4 Transaction group: 1831937 Timestamp: 2008-11-20:11:14:54 GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 ... Uber version: 10 Transaction group: 114560 Timestamp: 2009-01-07:09:59:11 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 Uberblock Offset: 0e18400 (14779392) Uber version: 10 Transaction group: 114561 Timestamp: 2009-01-07:09:59:41 GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 ... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
