Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool vs df
This was enlightening! Thanks a lot and sorry for the noise. Lars-Gunnar Persson On 9. mars. 2009, at 14.27, Tim wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Lars-Gunnar Persson > wrote: I've a interesting situation. I've created two pool now and one pool named "Data" and another named "raid5". Check the details here: bash-3.00# zpool list NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT Data 10.7T 9.82T892G91% ONLINE - raid5 10.9T145K 10.9T 0% ONLINE - As you see, the sizes are approximately the same. If I run the df command, it reports: bash-3.00# df -h /Data Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on Data11T 108M 154G 1%/Data bash-3.00# df -h /raid5 Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on raid5 8.9T40K 8.9T 1%/raid5 You see that the Data has 11 TB when zpool reported 10.7 TB and the raid5 has 10.9TB in zpool but only 8.9 TB when using df. Thats a difference of 2 TB. Where did they go? Any explanation would be find. Regards, Lars-Gunnar Persson Parity drives. zpool list shows total size including parity drives. df is showing usable after subtracting parity drives. --Tim ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool vs df
Here is what zpool status reports:
bash-3.00# zpool status
pool: Data
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
Data ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000402001FC442Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
pool: raid5
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ
WRITE CKSUM
raid5 ONLINE 0
0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0
0 0
c7t6000402001FC442C609DCA22d0 ONLINE 0
0 0
c7t6000402001FC442C609DCA4Ad0 ONLINE 0
0 0
c7t6000402001FC442C609DCAA2d0 ONLINE 0
0 0
c7t6000402001FC442C609DCABFd0 ONLINE 0
0 0
c7t6000402001FC442C609DCADBd0 ONLINE 0
0 0
c7t6000402001FC442C609DCAF8d0 ONLINE 0
0 0
errors: No known data errors
On 9. mars. 2009, at 14.29, Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 09 March, 2009 - Lars-Gunnar Persson sent me these 1,1K bytes:
I've a interesting situation. I've created two pool now and one pool
named "Data" and another named "raid5". Check the details here:
bash-3.00# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH
ALTROOT
Data 10.7T 9.82T892G91% ONLINE -
raid5 10.9T145K 10.9T 0% ONLINE -
As you see, the sizes are approximately the same. If I run the df
command, it reports:
bash-3.00# df -h /Data
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
Data11T 108M 154G 1%/Data
bash-3.00# df -h /raid5
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
raid5 8.9T40K 8.9T 1%/raid5
You see that the Data has 11 TB when zpool reported 10.7 TB and the
raid5 has 10.9TB in zpool but only 8.9 TB when using df. Thats a
difference of 2 TB. Where did they go?
To your raid5 (raidz) parity.
Check 'zpool status' to see how your two pools differ.. zpool list
shows
the disk space you have.. zfs/df shows how much you can store there..
/Tomas
--
Tomas Ögren, st...@acc.umu.se, http://www.acc.umu.se/~stric/
|- Student at Computing Science, University of Umeå
`- Sysadmin at {cs,acc}.umu.se
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
.--.
|Lars-Gunnar
Persson |
|IT-
sjef |
|
|
|Nansen senteret for miljø og
fjernmåling |
|Adresse : Thormøhlensgate 47, 5006
Bergen|
|Direkte : 55 20 58 31, sentralbord: 55 20 58 00, fax: 55 20 58
01|
|Internett: http://www.nersc.no, e-post: lars-
gunnar.pers...@nersc.no |
'--'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool vs df
On 09 March, 2009 - Lars-Gunnar Persson sent me these 1,1K bytes:
> I've a interesting situation. I've created two pool now and one pool
> named "Data" and another named "raid5". Check the details here:
>
> bash-3.00# zpool list
> NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
> Data 10.7T 9.82T892G91% ONLINE -
> raid5 10.9T145K 10.9T 0% ONLINE -
>
> As you see, the sizes are approximately the same. If I run the df
> command, it reports:
>
> bash-3.00# df -h /Data
> Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
> Data11T 108M 154G 1%/Data
> bash-3.00# df -h /raid5
> Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
> raid5 8.9T40K 8.9T 1%/raid5
>
> You see that the Data has 11 TB when zpool reported 10.7 TB and the
> raid5 has 10.9TB in zpool but only 8.9 TB when using df. Thats a
> difference of 2 TB. Where did they go?
To your raid5 (raidz) parity.
Check 'zpool status' to see how your two pools differ.. zpool list shows
the disk space you have.. zfs/df shows how much you can store there..
/Tomas
--
Tomas Ögren, st...@acc.umu.se, http://www.acc.umu.se/~stric/
|- Student at Computing Science, University of Umeå
`- Sysadmin at {cs,acc}.umu.se
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zpool vs df
I've a interesting situation. I've created two pool now and one pool named "Data" and another named "raid5". Check the details here: bash-3.00# zpool list NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT Data 10.7T 9.82T892G91% ONLINE - raid5 10.9T145K 10.9T 0% ONLINE - As you see, the sizes are approximately the same. If I run the df command, it reports: bash-3.00# df -h /Data Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on Data11T 108M 154G 1%/Data bash-3.00# df -h /raid5 Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on raid5 8.9T40K 8.9T 1%/raid5 You see that the Data has 11 TB when zpool reported 10.7 TB and the raid5 has 10.9TB in zpool but only 8.9 TB when using df. Thats a difference of 2 TB. Where did they go? Any explanation would be find. Regards, Lars-Gunnar Persson ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
