Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
Thanks for the feedback. Nigel noticed this as well, slated for next release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-241 Patrick Doug Cutting wrote: +1 I note that 'ant clean test' fails, since the build requires an svn checkout, but 'ant test' on a release succeeds. It would be best if the build worked without a subversion checkout. But that's a nit. Doug Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license header to a source file: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
+1. Tests pass fine for me. -Flavio On Nov 25, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license header to a source file: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
+1 I note that 'ant clean test' fails, since the build requires an svn checkout, but 'ant test' on a release succeeds. It would be best if the build worked without a subversion checkout. But that's a nit. Doug Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license header to a source file: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
+1, units, etc.. pass for me. Nigel Daley wrote: +1. Signature and MD5 check out. Unit tests pass. I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-241 but don't think it's a blocker for this release (it's not a regression from 3.0) Nige On 11/24/08 5:50 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: November 24, 2008 5:50:24 PM PST To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1) I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license header to a source file: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 Should we release this? Patrick
RE: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
+1. Signature and MD5 check out. Unit tests pass. I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-241 but don't think it's a blocker for this release (it's not a regression from 3.0) Nige On 11/24/08 5:50 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: November 24, 2008 5:50:24 PM PST To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1) I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license header to a source file: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
+1 .. I ran ant test and some command line testing on a quorum of 3 on a single node. mahadev On 11/24/08 5:50 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. > > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the > *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** > > http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ > > The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license > header to a source file: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 > > Should we release this? > > Patrick >
RE: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
+1 This candidate passes our tests. Thanks again Patrick! Stu -Original Message- From: "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:50pm To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1) I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license header to a source file: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 Should we release this? Patrick
[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candidate-1/ The only change to rc1 from rc0 is adding a missing apache license header to a source file: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-232 Should we release this? Patrick
