Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
With 6 +1's (3 PMC) and no -1's the vote passes. I'm working to publish the release and will send announcements as soon as that's done. Patrick On 05/13/2010 10:51 PM, Stack wrote: +1 I installed it under hbase cluster as a 5-node ensemble. Looks like it works like 3.3.0. Did some messing sending nc commands. No prob. St.Ack On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Mahadev Konarmaha...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: +1. Ran ant tests and some manual testing to bring up a cluster and run manual commands on the zookeeper cluster of 1,3, 5 nodes. Thanks Mahadev On 5/11/10 10:32 PM, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: +1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
All the Junit tests work as expected but I've got a failing test on the C client. I have attached the log messages. Is this an expected (accepted) error? I'm now running the tests on zookeeper 3.3.0. I'm testing on: Ubuntu 10.4 LTS Server Edition (64 bit) running inside VMWare Workstation on Windows7 $ java -version java version 1.6.0_20 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode) $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.4 --program-suffix=-4.4 --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-plugin --enable-objc-gc --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i486 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: +1, works for me as well. -Flavio On May 12, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: +1, things check out for me too. ben On 05/11/2010 11:19 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: +1, Java tests pass for me, as do Python ones. Henry On 11 May 2010 22:32, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: +1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick -- Savu Andrei Website: http://www.andreisavu.ro/ [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andrei/release/zookeeper-3.3.1/build/test/test-cppunit' [exec] ./zktest-st [exec] ZooKeeper server startedRunning [exec] Zookeeper_operations::testPing : elapsed 2 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_operations::testTimeoutCausedByWatches1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_operations::testTimeoutCausedByWatches2 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_operations::testOperationsAndDisconnectConcurrently1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_operations::testOperationsAndDisconnectConcurrently2 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_operations::testConcurrentOperations1 : elapsed 202 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testBasic : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testAddressResolution : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testMultipleAddressResolution : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testNullAddressString : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testEmptyAddressString : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testOneSpaceAddressString : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testTwoSpacesAddressString : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testInvalidAddressString1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testInvalidAddressString2 : assertion : elapsed 10012 [exec] Zookeeper_init::testNonexistentHost : elapsed 57 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testOutOfMemory_init : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testOutOfMemory_getaddrs1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testOutOfMemory_getaddrs2 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_init::testPermuteAddrsList : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_close::testCloseUnconnected : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_close::testCloseUnconnected1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_close::testCloseConnected1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_close::testCloseFromWatcher1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_simpleSystem::testAsyncWatcherAutoReset ZooKeeper server started : elapsed 15025 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_simpleSystem::testDeserializeString : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_watchers::testDefaultSessionWatcher1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_watchers::testDefaultSessionWatcher2 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_watchers::testObjectSessionWatcher1 : elapsed 0 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_watchers::testObjectSessionWatcher2 : elapsed 202 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_watchers::testNodeWatcher1 : elapsed 407 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_watchers::testChildWatcher1 : elapsed 302 : OK [exec] Zookeeper_watchers::testChildWatcher2 : elapsed 303 : OK [exec] /home/andrei/release/zookeeper-3.3.1/src/c/tests/TestZookeeperInit.cc:233: Assertion: equality assertion failed [Expected: 2, Actual : 22] [exec] Failures !!! [exec]
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
Looks like some diff in the errno reported in 10.4 (I'm on karmic and it
passes):
void testInvalidAddressString2()
{
const string INVALID_HOST(host1:+host:123);
zh=zookeeper_init(INVALID_HOST.c_str(),0,0,0,0,0);
CPPUNIT_ASSERT(zh==0);
***CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(ENOENT,errno);
}
22 is EINVAL
So this is fine for 3.3.1, but enter a JIRA to address it in the next
release(s).
Thanks!
Patrick
On 05/13/2010 08:19 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
All the Junit tests work as expected but I've got a failing test on
the C client. I have attached the log messages.
Is this an expected (accepted) error? I'm now running the tests on
zookeeper 3.3.0.
I'm testing on: Ubuntu 10.4 LTS Server Edition (64 bit) running inside
VMWare Workstation on Windows7
$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_20
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode)
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu
4.4.3-4ubuntu5'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --enable-multiarch --enable-linker-build-id
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext
--enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.4
--program-suffix=-4.4 --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-plugin --enable-objc-gc
--disable-werror --with-arch-32=i486 --with-tune=generic
--enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5)
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Flavio Junqueiraf...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1, works for me as well.
-Flavio
On May 12, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
+1, things check out for me too.
ben
On 05/11/2010 11:19 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
+1, Java tests pass for me, as do Python ones.
Henry
On 11 May 2010 22:32, Patrick Huntph...@apache.orgwrote:
+1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a
real cluster (4letter word fix).
Patrick
On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix
release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release
notes for details.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.***
http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
+1. Ran ant tests and some manual testing to bring up a cluster and run manual commands on the zookeeper cluster of 1,3, 5 nodes. Thanks Mahadev On 5/11/10 10:32 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: +1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
+1 I installed it under hbase cluster as a 5-node ensemble. Looks like it works like 3.3.0. Did some messing sending nc commands. No prob. St.Ack On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: +1. Ran ant tests and some manual testing to bring up a cluster and run manual commands on the zookeeper cluster of 1,3, 5 nodes. Thanks Mahadev On 5/11/10 10:32 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: +1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
+1, Java tests pass for me, as do Python ones. Henry On 11 May 2010 22:32, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: +1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick -- Henry Robinson Software Engineer Cloudera 415-994-6679
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
+1, things check out for me too. ben On 05/11/2010 11:19 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: +1, Java tests pass for me, as do Python ones. Henry On 11 May 2010 22:32, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: +1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
+1, works for me as well. -Flavio On May 12, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: +1, things check out for me too. ben On 05/11/2010 11:19 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: +1, Java tests pass for me, as do Python ones. Henry On 11 May 2010 22:32, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: +1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
+1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a real cluster (4letter word fix). Patrick On 05/07/2010 11:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick
[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.1 (candidate 0)
I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.1. This is a bug fix release addressing seventeen issues (one critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes 11am pacific time, Wednesday, May 12.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick
