[Zope-dev] howto move the portal_catalog to a separate zeo-server ?
hi, In a zeo-client, zeo-server-setup is it possible to move the portal_catalog of a cmf/cps-instance, to a separate zeo-server ? If yes, what would be the steps ? Especially how to define the mount-point. -- Mit freundlichen GrüßenJoachim Schmitz .. AixtraWare eK ..Joachim Schmitz ..www.aixtraware.de ..t: +49-2464-8851 Hüsgenstr. 33a .d-52457 Aldenhoven .f: +49-2464-905163 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: howto move the portal_catalog to a separate zeo-server ?
Joachim Schmitz(e)k dio: hi, In a zeo-client, zeo-server-setup is it possible to move the portal_catalog of a cmf/cps-instance, to a separate zeo-server ? If yes, what would be the steps ? Especially how to define the mount-point. It's explained in this How-To: http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/mount-portal_catalog-in-separate-zodb/ Mikel -- Mikel Larreategi [EMAIL PROTECTED] CodeSyntax Azitaingo Industrialdea 3 K E-20600 Eibar Tel: (+34) 943 82 17 80 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Jun 25 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Jun 26 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Jun 25 20:51:04 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-June/007939.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Jun 25 20:52:35 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-June/007940.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Jun 25 20:54:06 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-June/007941.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Jun 25 20:55:36 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-June/007942.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Jun 25 20:57:07 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-June/007943.html ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: On 25 Jun 2007, at 12:09 , Andreas Jung wrote: --On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :) That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10. when are they due? unfortunately i won't be able to do the backporting before thursday, since we've got a project release on wednesday... I defer the 2.9/2.10 for some days until I know how we should deal with the current state of the Zope 3.2/3.3 branches. I realize you're waiting for a release of the Zope 3.2 branch to make another Zope 2.9.x release. I meant to respond earlier, apologies for the delay. I have no intentions of making another Zope 3.2 release (unless somebody really wants me to, in which case I'll do it). So for all I care, you can just tag Zope 3.2.3, put that in the external of Zope 2.9 and be done with it. Please do the rest of the release managment before making that tag: - Update the changelog to indicate the release date, SVN tag, etc. (on the branch before copying!) - Update any version ID in the configure script. Then make the tag. What's the matter with the Zope 3.3 branch then? Don't we need a released 3.3.x? Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGgQzy+gerLs4ltQ4RAtOxAKCW0G62p+AKqM+5ixUvPJABaAaqVgCghg+Y 0U5Ns+Sx9MpFxlpsvsTc5Ng= =+O+G -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch
On 26 Jun 2007, at 14:56 , Tres Seaver wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: On 25 Jun 2007, at 12:09 , Andreas Jung wrote: --On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :) That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10. when are they due? unfortunately i won't be able to do the backporting before thursday, since we've got a project release on wednesday... I defer the 2.9/2.10 for some days until I know how we should deal with the current state of the Zope 3.2/3.3 branches. I realize you're waiting for a release of the Zope 3.2 branch to make another Zope 2.9.x release. I meant to respond earlier, apologies for the delay. I have no intentions of making another Zope 3.2 release (unless somebody really wants me to, in which case I'll do it). So for all I care, you can just tag Zope 3.2.3, put that in the external of Zope 2.9 and be done with it. Please do the rest of the release managment before making that tag: - Update the changelog to indicate the release date, SVN tag, etc. (on the branch before copying!) - Update any version ID in the configure script. Then make the tag. Yeah, thanks for the reminder. What's the matter with the Zope 3.3 branch then? Don't we need a released 3.3.x? Right, right. I meant to say: What's the matter with the latest Zope 3.3.x release? Are there any bugfixes in the Zope 3.3 branch that Zope 2 is waiting for? Otherwise we can just release with the latest Zope 3.3.x... ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: SVN problems merging the Zope 2.11 integration branch
Andreas Jung wrote: Cdoc/CHANGES.txt Ulib/python/Products/Five/i18n.zcml Ulib/python/Products/Five/event.zcml Ulib/python/Products/Five/meta.zcml Ulib/python/Products/Five/form/tests/forms.txt Dlib/python/Products/Transience/tests/testCounters.py Ulib/python/Products/PageTemplates/www/ptEdit.zpt Ulib/python/ZPublisher/HTTPRequest.py Ulib/python/ZPublisher/tests/testHTTPRequest.py Ulib/python/tempstorage/tests/testTemporaryStorage.py U lib/python/zope/app U lib/python/zope C lib/python You're getting a conflict here on the externals because you recently stitched RestrictedPython 3.4.1 into the trunk. I suggest resolving this manually. Usetup.py U utilities updates only some files. Well, perhaps only those few files were changed in the branch? No svn:externals are being updated. That is hard to believe. The 'zope' and 'zope/app' externals should be ok. -- http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch
--On 26. Juni 2007 15:00:23 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't we need a released 3.3.x? Right, right. I meant to say: What's the matter with the latest Zope 3.3.x release? Are there any bugfixes in the Zope 3.3 branch that Zope 2 is waiting for? Otherwise we can just release with the latest Zope 3.3.x... There is basically nothing with the 3.2 and 3.3 branches. I just don't know about all details of the current 3.X development in order to feel comfortable enough to create a Zope 2 release from the current branches without having the OK from the related release masters. I could make (internal) tags on my own but this should be done in general by the responsible release manager (just for release safety) :-) Andreas pgpx9X1eIFW7p.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] [SVN] Zope trunk - merged stuff for Zope 2.11 released
The Zope trunk has been updated in preparation for the next Zope 2.11 release. It contains now the Zope 3.4 codebase and uses ZODB 3.8 with BLOB support. We will start with the Zope 2.11 beta cycle shortly after Zope 3.4 goes beta. Are any major developments pending for Zope 2.11? I only know of some Five exception work (Martijn Faasen). Andreas pgpDpVCUzFMep.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope] how to restore a copied instance.
hi, i needed to reinstall my zope site on another computer so i installed (in debian) plone-site using aptitude ... it automatically makes a new instance and starts the server. Is this the same Zope version that you have on another computer? after that i stopped the server ... and copied my site (instance folder) from the other computer over this one. when i start /etc/init.d/zope2.9 start ... it doesn't complain , but i can't open the site. (same instance names, same port number ) What does this mean that you can't open the site? Errors? i tryied another aproach ... copied back the default installed instance ... and only overwritten the var folder with the data from the original site. You also need Products/ from previous instance and files from Extensions/ folder this way i hoped that Data.fs which contained all my objects ... will automatically become visible. it doesn't work this way either, it only sees the default objects, i can access the site ... but all my objects are not visible. Check ControlPanel-Product Management if your products are installed correctly -- Maciej Wisniowski ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] New class, no access to manage_propertiesForm etc.
Hi,
I have created a new class in my product, but I can't access the
PropertyManager pages for it:
import Persistence
from OFS.PropertyManager import PropertyManager
# Zope security infrastructure
from Globals import InitializeClass
from AccessControl import ClassSecurityInfo
class MyClass(Persistence.Persistent,PropertyManager):
L'objet d'interfacage
# Properties are default are persistent typed attributes with
builtin form
# management in the ZMI
_properties = (
{'id':'remote_email', 'type':'string', 'mode': 'w'},
{'id':'local_email', 'type':'string', 'mode': 'w'},
)
# default values
remote_email = ''
local_email = ''
# Tabs that are displayed in the ZMI (inherited from the base
classes)
manage_options = (PropertyManager.manage_options)
# Let me see those pages
__ac_permissions__=(('Manage properties', ('manage_addProperty',
'manage_editProperties',
'manage_delProperties',
'manage_changeProperties',
'manage_propertiesForm',
'manage_propertyTypeForm',
'manage_changePropertyTypes',
)
))
def __init__(self):
pass
security = ClassSecurityInfo()
security.declarePublic('show')
def show(self):
return str(self)
InitializeClass(MyClass)
An instance of this class is held as an attribute of a tool in the
product.
class DBRTool(UniqueObject, SimpleItem, ActionProviderBase,
PropertyManager):
Tool for some logic of the DBR site
def __init__(self):
# interfacage
self.myInstance = MyClass()
Accessing http://.../portal_dbrtool/myInstance shows str(myInstance),
but http://.../portal_dbrtool/myInstance/manage_propertiesForm
http://.../portal_dbrtool/myInstance/manage_propertiesForm shows You
are not authorized to access this resource. After a login that cannot
be satisfied.
The manage_options and __ac_permissions__ are set according to the
instructions in PropertyManager.
Where am I going wrong? How can I access these pages?
TIA,
Jonathan
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or
any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Zope products that allows people to Add Comments to publications
I have been wanting to try a SquishDot site also and get the very same error. Traceback (innermost last): Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in publish Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in mapply Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 42, in call_object Module App.special_dtml, line 65, in __call__ Module DocumentTemplate.DT_String, line 476, in __call__ TypeError: unbound method mailhost_list() must be called with SquishSite instance as first argument (got nothing instead) Zope Version(Zope 2.10.3-final, python 2.4.3, linux2) Python Version 2.4.3 (#1, Mar 14 2007, 18:51:08) [GCC 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-52)] System Platform linux2 SOFTWARE_HOME /var/zope/lib/python ZOPE_HOME /var/zope INSTANCE_HOME /var/zope CLIENT_HOME /var/zope/var Network ServicesZServer.HTTPServer.zhttp_server (Port: 8082) ZServer.HTTPServer.zwebdav_server (Port: 9800) Thomas On Monday 25 June 2007 19:03, kamal hamzat wrote: hi Tom, I have this error when add squishdot from ZMI Error Type: TypeError Error Value: unbound method mailhost_list() must be called with SquishSite instance as first argument (got nothing instead) Traceback (innermost last): a.. Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in publish b.. Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in mapply c.. Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 42, in call_object d.. Module App.special_dtml, line 65, in __call__ e.. Module DocumentTemplate.DT_String, line 476, in __call__ Thanks - Original Message - From: Tom Von Lahndorff To: kamal hamzat Cc: zope@zope.org Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:14 PM Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope products that allows people to Add Comments to publications check out http://www.squishdot.org On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:00 PM, kamal hamzat wrote: Hello, Is there any zope product that allows visitors to Add Comments to the news / articles, just like the one in plone. Thanks ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) -- Thomas McMillan Grant Bennett Appalachian State University Operations Systems AnalystP O Box 32026 University Library Boone, North Carolina 28608 (828) 262 6587 They say a picture is worth a thousand words. As videos could be 25 pictures per second and might last several minutes, how many words is that? - Linux Journal, July 2007 Library Systems Help Desk: http://www.library.appstate.edu/help/ ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: how to restore a copied instance.
Tudor Gabriel wrote: hi, i needed to reinstall my zope site on another computer so i installed (in debian) plone-site using aptitude ... it automatically makes a new instance and starts the server. after that i stopped the server ... and copied my site (instance folder) from the other computer over this one. when i start /etc/init.d/zope2.9 start ... it doesn't complain , but i can't open the site. (same instance names, same port number ) Use 'zopectl fg' to run it in the foreground and see what errors you get. i tryied another aproach ... copied back the default installed instance ... and only overwritten the var folder with the data from the original site. this way i hoped that Data.fs which contained all my objects ... will automatically become visible. it doesn't work this way either, it only sees the default objects, i can access the site ... but all my objects are not visible. It's generally much more helpful if you say exactly what is not visible -- and where. As is, this is pretty much information-free. grep shows that the names of the objects folders are still in Data.fs ... so they exist ... i think i missed one configuration somewhere ... to make the folders added by me visible. do you know how can i achieve that? You may be missing a Product. Visit the Zope Control Panel and look for a broken box. Alternately, are there broken object icons in the ZMI for those objects which are not visible? --jcc -- Connexions http://cnx.org Building Websites with Plone http://plonebook.packtpub.com ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] temp_folder not MountTemporaryFolder?
Thanks to all... The problem was else where... I ran the bench and observed that /temp_folder/session_data reported no objects. So something else was causing the bunch of conflicts. I have found that the problem was Plone set the last login time in logged_in.cpy, commenting this line no more conflicts were issued, with this bench. Again, thanks to all. I'll keep reading and digging Plone and Zope. Currently my next move is to make improvements to CacheFu, in order to cache Five Views. Best regards, Manuel. On 6/24/07, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 24, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Manuel Vázquez Acosta wrote: Let me see if I got this right: According to ZODB.Mount.MountPoint: mount points are Zope objects that, when traversed, accesses a different database. You got it. Do they report themselves as the container-class defined in zope.conf? I mean, when I traverse to /temp_folder what do I get? Is it the MountPoint instance or the container-class instance? Where should I look for this code? It's the container-class instance (or at least it looks like it when you get there, it does a bunch of trickery under the hood). The default container class is Products.TemporaryFolder.TemporaryContainer. You can influence it within zope.conf though. One of the container class instances (mounted at the /temp_folder mount point) is created within the OFS.Application.install_tempfolder_and_sdc method during Zope startup. I have tried faster but without any luck. I modified OFS.Application and replaced TransientObjectContainer with faster.SessionDataContainer, but still I had too many ConflictErrors (didn't make any measure to compare with TransientObjectContainer). Have you tried putting the session data container *not* in temp_folder? In other words, create a session data container in the root of your zodb, then cause the session_data_manager object to point at that? You may observe better performance (with the penalty of more storage growth) because FileStorage is typically better at resolving conflicts nowadays than TemporaryStorage is. Note that if you're using ZEO, don't put the data container in the root, you will only get more conflicts. Instead, mount a FileStorage somewhere. See http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/multiple-plone-sites-per- zope-instance-using-separate-data-fs-files-for-each-one for a reasonable explanation of how to create new mount points (ignore the Ploney bits, only pay attention to steps 1 and 2). - C ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Several questions on Z3 Views backported thru Five
The Plone App is an Intranet for a customer of my employer that builds upon CMFPlone, but most of its interface is based on Five Views. So we need caching those. Thanks for the tip. I will try ZopeProfiler right away. Best regards, Manuel. Dieter Maurer wrote: Manuel Vázquez Acosta wrote at 2007-6-21 14:16 +: ... I have tested a fresh Plone 2.5.3 with Zope 2.9.7, plus Squid + CacheFu and everything went just fine. The laptop didn't even notice such a load. But, when I installed the Plone App, even much smaller load didn't pass the test. What is the Plone App? Use a profiler (e.g. ZopeProfiler) to obtain a timing profile. It will tell you where time is spent for. -- Dieter ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Several-questions-on-Z3-Views-backported-thru-Five-tf3962154.html#a11308846 Sent from the Zope - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Several questions on Z3 Views backported thru Five
I'm heading that way... I have been reading CacheFu does not support yet Five Views, but there's a roadmap (http://plone.org/products/cachefu/roadmap/6). I'm willing to help with that, but I have talked yet to the rest of the participants. However, I have a deadline for this App, I have proposed several in-house caching mechanisms, just for now... Thanks and best regards, Manuel. J Cameron Cooper-8 wrote: Manuel Vázquez Acosta wrote: Hi all, I've been asked to deploy a Plone App which must satisfy a load of at least 1200 users over 8 min. I have tested a fresh Plone 2.5.3 with Zope 2.9.7, plus Squid + CacheFu and everything went just fine. The laptop didn't even notice such a load. But, when I installed the Plone App, even much smaller load didn't pass the test. My first guess would be that the cache setup need to be configured to work with your application. CacheFu knows about the default setup, but not about a custom application. It may therefore not be caching, or be caching inappropriately. I think examining the response headers is the best way to determine this. --jcc -- Connexions http://cnx.org Building Websites with Plone http://plonebook.packtpub.com ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Several-questions-on-Z3-Views-backported-thru-Five-tf3962154.html#a11308959 Sent from the Zope - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Several questions on Z3 Views backported thru Five
Thanks for your response... I will try that. I have already started to clean up the views and creating a very simple custom caching mechanism to achieve better perfomance. We have made some success, but we're still working. Best regards, Manuel. Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manuel Vázquez Acosta wrote: Hi all, I've been asked to deploy a Plone App which must satisfy a load of at least 1200 users over 8 min. I have tested a fresh Plone 2.5.3 with Zope 2.9.7, plus Squid + CacheFu and everything went just fine. The laptop didn't even notice such a load. But, when I installed the Plone App, even much smaller load didn't pass the test. Thus, I have to dig into the source code of the app to find the source of the problems. I have found that the app uses Z3 concepts, specially Views. This question poped into my mind: 1. Does Zope2+Five creates Views everytime they are used, and discard them afterwards? If this is the case, then maybe I should code a ViewFactory which caches frequently used views. This may help. Nope, that won't help, because views are bindings between context objects and requests. The time required to create views / adapters is completely negligible compared to the time required to *render* the Plone main template. You need to focus on stripping out features you don't need in that template, and / or caching fragments of it. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGe92C+gerLs4ltQ4RAmVvAJ9+BXTwKTe9HqIq12XMYfu8CYtJkQCgpuce rRbBU2hqJKAQWXi3zFmS4V4= =zhVX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Several-questions-on-Z3-Views-backported-thru-Five-tf3962154.html#a11309004 Sent from the Zope - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] A question on pool-size
Hi all, I'm having a rather weird behavior configuring pool-size. I put a pool-size of 20 on two zeo-clients, but monitoring one of them I saw this on logs: 2007-06-26T16:47:02 WARNING ZODB.DB DB.open() has 19 open connections with a pool_size of 10 -- 2007-06-26T16:47:02 WARNING ZODB.DB DB.open() has 20 open connections with a pool_size of 10 -- 2007-06-26T16:47:02 CRITICAL ZODB.DB DB.open() has 90 open connections with a pool_size of 7 Sometimes it reported pool-size of 10, and sometimes it reported 7! What could this be? Another question: My expect a load of 50 concurrent requests, so I set zserver-threads to 25 on both zeo-clients, and a pool-size of 20 (but behaving as explained above). Do this conf make any sense? Where should I read to get more info about this matter? Best regards, Manuel. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-question-on-pool-size-tf3984717.html#a11313581 Sent from the Zope - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] A question on pool-size
Hello First, which Zope version do you have? Sometimes it reported pool-size of 10, and sometimes it reported 7! What could this be? Maybe you're seeing warnings from few storages? but I'm not sure how this works an I have no idea why you're seeing pool sizes as 7 and 10 if you set this to 20 Another question: My expect a load of 50 concurrent requests, so I set zserver-threads to 25 on both zeo-clients, and a pool-size of 20 (but behaving as explained above). Do this conf make any sense? Where should I read to get more info about this matter? I think it is better to use more Zeo clients than bump number of threads. There were some benchmarks (or sth like that) showing that bigger number of threads doesn't help too much to performance, and it may be even worse. In your setup, if you have 25 threads you should have pool size bigger than 25 - every thread will possibly use ZODB so it should have connection to use. In fact connection is created as needed, even if pool_size is too small. That is why number of connections in your logs is bigger than pool_size. -- Maciej Wisniowski ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] A question on pool-size
Maciej, Zope is Zope 2.9.6 (2.9.6-4etch1 from Debian repo). I will try more zeo clients. Thanks for the tip. The thing that is bugging me is that it seems my configuration is not being taken into account. Is there an absolute limit for pool_size? Best regards, Manuel. Maciej Wisniowski wrote: Hello First, which Zope version do you have? Sometimes it reported pool-size of 10, and sometimes it reported 7! What could this be? Maybe you're seeing warnings from few storages? but I'm not sure how this works an I have no idea why you're seeing pool sizes as 7 and 10 if you set this to 20 Another question: My expect a load of 50 concurrent requests, so I set zserver-threads to 25 on both zeo-clients, and a pool-size of 20 (but behaving as explained above). Do this conf make any sense? Where should I read to get more info about this matter? I think it is better to use more Zeo clients than bump number of threads. There were some benchmarks (or sth like that) showing that bigger number of threads doesn't help too much to performance, and it may be even worse. In your setup, if you have 25 threads you should have pool size bigger than 25 - every thread will possibly use ZODB so it should have connection to use. In fact connection is created as needed, even if pool_size is too small. That is why number of connections in your logs is bigger than pool_size. -- Maciej Wisniowski ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-question-on-pool-size-tf3984717.html#a11314557 Sent from the Zope - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
