Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] new www.zope.org, new dev.zope.org, old www.zope.org

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Withers
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> There really should be not problem to integrate current
> www.zope.org/Products and www.zope.org/Members including the LDAP
> authentication service into an new www.zope.org.

I really don't think we need to implement this if Andreas' redirect plan 
works out. You're more than welcome to maintain old.zope.org ;-)

> No need to break any
> links - we already did similar with moving DevHome wikis out to
> wiki.zope.org. 

Well yeah, but that hasn't made the information there any more 
maintained. Just last week I had to go through and remove a couple of 
references to account.php.

I know the plan here is to replace that with the contents of 
http://docs.zope.org/developer/, and have dev.zope.org go to the same 
place. The sooner that happens the better...

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Withers
Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> 3. Grok moves over either to Zope.pipeline or repose.bfg as publisher in 
>>> Grok 2.
>> Grok is Grok, Repoze is Repoze, lets leave them be and let them choose their 
>> own names...
> 
> Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive.

For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually 
exclusive in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the 
other exists...

>> Bream 4 on top of Framework 4
>> Standard 4(which would include Framework 4)
>> Plone 4 on top of Standard 4
>> Repoze and Grok on top of Framework 4
> 
> Yup. Sounds good to me.
> 
> As usual, I don't think any decisions should be taken. This is just
> what I would like to see. People either do it or do not.

This last paragraph is a bit meaningless. Lack of action is what's got 
us here in the first place. I'd like to see some consensus and then 
action be taken...

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-06 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34, Chris Withers  wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive.
>
> For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually exclusive
> in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the other exists...

I think you confuse Repoze and repoze.bfg. Grok can, and IMO should,
run on top of Repoze.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Withers
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34, Chris Withers  wrote:
>> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive.
>> For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually exclusive
>> in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the other exists...
> 
> I think you confuse Repoze and repoze.bfg. 

...exactly as any newbie would ;-)
(and I *am* a newbie with Repoze as a whole...)

> Grok can, and IMO should,
> run on top of Repoze.

Again, from a newbie perspective I see "Grok", at that level, I don't 
care what it's built on.

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


[Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080

2009-04-06 Thread Bobby

Hi,

I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal to 
http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request 
http://internal:80/internal, the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still 
want http://internal:80/ to stay intact so that the contents from port 80 will 
still be served; just the http://internal:80/internal to point to the Zope 
folder http://internal:8080/internal. Hope that makes sense. Could someone help 
me out with the syntax?  Tried the syntax below but not getting desired 
results. Thanks!


ServerName internal
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^/(.*) 
http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/$1
 [L,P]






  
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080

2009-04-06 Thread Ricardo Newbery

On Apr 6, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Bobby wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal 
>  to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request 
> http://internal:80/internal 
> , the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still want http://internal:80/ 
>  to stay intact so that the contents from port 80 will still be  
> served; just the http://internal:80/internal to point to the Zope  
> folder http://internal:8080/internal. Hope that makes sense. Could  
> someone help me out with the syntax?  Tried the syntax below but not  
> getting desired results. Thanks!
>
> 
> ServerName internal
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteRule ^/(.*) 
> http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/$1
>  
>  [L,P]
> 



http://www.google.com/search?q="Virtual+Host+Monster"+"Inside+Out";

> RewriteRule ^internal/(.*) 
> http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/_vh_internal/$1
>  
>  [P]



Ric



___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080

2009-04-06 Thread robert rottermann
Bobby schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal 
> to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request 
> http://internal:80/internal, the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still 
> want http://internal:80/ to stay intact so that the contents from port 80 
> will still be served; just the http://internal:80/internal to point to the 
> Zope folder http://internal:8080/internal. Hope that makes sense. Could 
> someone help me out with the syntax?  Tried the syntax below but not getting 
> desired results. Thanks!
> 
> 
> ServerName internal
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteRule ^/(.*) 
> http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/$1
>  [L,P]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> ___
> Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists - 
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
> 
> 
go to plone.org
there are step by step examples.
you find them under dokumentation
robert
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )