On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:39:37 -0800, Chris Withers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI:
It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope
while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended
"mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection.
Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient.
Show me some evidence proving that fcgi or mod_proxy is the significant
limiting performance factor in a setup involving zope and I'll take this
seriously ;-)
FWIW, we did some rudimentary benchmarking with Zope + Apache using
mod_proxy vs. Zope + FastCGI + lighttpd (a very fast and lightweight web
server). There was no difference in performance since Zope is so slow in
the first place - so it didn't make any difference.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Alexander Limi · Chief Architect · Plone Solutions · Norway
Consulting · Training · Development · http://www.plonesolutions.com
_____________________________________________________________________
Plone Co-Founder · http://plone.org · Connecting Content
Plone Foundation · http://plone.org/foundation · Protecting Plone
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
