Re: [Zope] load-balancing recommendations ? (configuration and hardware)

2000-06-10 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton

+[ chas ]-
|
| 
| ps. In the past I've got around this by ensuring that if the
| very first request from a given browser is dealt with by, say, 
| server silo8.domain.com, then all subsequent requests from that
| browser are also dealt with by by that server. But that 
| (a) introduces head-aches with application logic and (b) is
| not good if silo8.domain.com suddenly goes down.

pps. If you use sessions that are not distributed (i.e. in memory), this
is the setup you need. It is a royal pain (thinking IIS + ASP here more than
anything)

-- 
Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet|  P:+61 7 3870 0066   | Andrew Milton
The Internet (Aust) Pty Ltd  |  F:+61 7 3870 4477   | 
ACN: 082 081 472 |  M:+61 416 022 411   | Carpe Daemon
PO Box 837 Indooroopilly QLD 4068|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| 

___
Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )




Re: [Zope] load-balancing recommendations ? (configuration and hardware)

2000-06-10 Thread Anthony Baxter


 chas wrote
 I've often heard about the infinite-scalability that will
 be created by something like ZEO and I've always wondered
 about one thing : how is the load-balancing being done ?

There's a number of approaches you can take here:

1. Buy something - a cisco localdirector, an arrowpoint (also now owned
by cisco), or similar. This is the approach we take - in a past life I've
seen an LD get the absolute crap kicked out of it and it just kept working
(it was in front of some _large_ proxy caches). 
www.cisco.com
www.arrowpoint.com

2. Software - there's linux virtual server, there's eddieware, there's
probably a bunch of commercial packages as well, although I don't know
why you'd bother...
www.linuxvirtualserver.org
www.eddieware.org

Which of these solutions you go for largely depends on your budget - the
first set of options are probably more robust and flexible, but the latter
is definately going to be cheaper :)

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

___
Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )