[Zope-CMF] Re: eggification status?
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > yuppie wrote: >> Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>> A related question is: how do we want to eggify CMF? It seems to make >>> sense to create one egg for the whole of CMF and a second egg for >>> GenericSetup. >> >> Why not one egg for each CMF product? Can you please elaborate? > > *Why* one egg for each product? We'll just end up with the same egg > madness that we have with Zope 3 (e.g. zope.app could've just as well > stayed one big egg, IMO). It's not like the different parts of the CMF > need to move at separate speeds... The different parts don't need to move at different speed, but I would see separate eggs as an option to drop some parts out of the bundle again, which don't see any development at all. For example CMFUid has never quite been expected as a first class citizen of CMF, so having a separate egg for it, would allow us to not use or develop it anymore, when there's really no one interested in it. After all we are only talking about 8 eggs here and not a gazillion of them like Zope 3 has. Hanno ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] Re: eggification status?
yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: A related question is: how do we want to eggify CMF? It seems to make sense to create one egg for the whole of CMF and a second egg for GenericSetup. Why not one egg for each CMF product? Can you please elaborate? *Why* one egg for each product? We'll just end up with the same egg madness that we have with Zope 3 (e.g. zope.app could've just as well stayed one big egg, IMO). It's not like the different parts of the CMF need to move at separate speeds... ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] Re: eggification status?
Wichert Akkerman wrote: A related question is: how do we want to eggify CMF? It seems to make sense to create one egg for the whole of CMF and a second egg for GenericSetup. Why not one egg for each CMF product? Can you please elaborate? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 7 OK, 4 Unknown
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Nov 12 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Nov 13 13:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 11 messages: 11 from CMF Unit Tests. Unknown --- Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:34:27 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006955.html Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-2.1 Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:35:57 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006956.html Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-trunk Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:37:27 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006957.html Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:38:57 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006958.html Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:23:56 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006948.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:25:26 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006949.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:26:56 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006950.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:28:26 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006951.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:29:56 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006952.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.0 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:31:26 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006953.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.0 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Nov 12 21:32:56 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-November/006954.html ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] eggification status?
A related question is: how do we want to eggify CMF? It seems to make sense to create one egg for the whole of CMF and a second egg for GenericSetup. At the moment CMFCore is its own egg though. Wichert. Previously yuppie wrote: > Hi! > > > Right now there are two versions of CMFCore and GenericSetup: > > Products.GenericSetup and GenericSetup > Products.CMFCore and CMFCore > > wichert is currently working on GenericSetup/trunk, tseaver stitched > today the 6 weeks old Products.GenericSetup/trunk/Products/GenericSetup > into CMF/trunk/ and > Products.GenericSetup/tags/1.3.2/Products/GenericSetup into > CMF/branches/2.1/ > > Products.CMFCore seems not to be used - changes still go into CMF/*/CMFCore > > Can we please have *one* location for each product? > > > Cheers, > > Yuppie > > ___ > Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf > > See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
