Re: [Zope-dev] bugday results.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:23:44PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Bugs squashed: 22
>
> 1105, 1107, 1108, 273, 331, 350, 382, 391, , 1095, 1074, 1110, 1016,
> 616, 682, 822, 582, 445, 799, 923, 426, 1100.
aw crud, I forgot... after giving you a hard time for getting
the date wrong on your blog :-{
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Look! Up in the sky! It's GNARLEY MEGATON CHAP!
(random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
RE: [Zope-dev] Re: bugday results.
HUGE PROPS to everybody today! I got caught in some unplanned things and never got there :( I *promise* we'll get a beta 3 out in the next two weeks - hopefully by this Friday now that I know how to drive the win32 install machinery (thanks Chris!) Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED] V.P. Engineering 540.361.1716 Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Maik Jablonski > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Zope-dev] Re: bugday results. > > > Chris McDonough wrote: > > Bugs squashed: 22 > > > > 1105, 1107, 1108, 273, 331, 350, 382, 391, , 1095, 1074, 1110, 1016, > > 616, 682, 822, 582, 445, 799, 923, 426, 1100. > > > > Not bad for a five-person IRC channel. ;-) > > Hi, > > just as a little post-contribution from me (I was out of office all the > day and couldn't join :( the bug day), all the links to the fixed bugs > for lazy click-and-view-people like me: > > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1105 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1107 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1108 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/273 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/331 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/350 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/382 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/391 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/ > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1095 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1074 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1110 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1016 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/616 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/682 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/822 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/582 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/445 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/799 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/923 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/426 > http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1100 > > Cheers, Maik > > > > ___ > Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) > ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: bugday results.
Chris McDonough wrote: Bugs squashed: 22 1105, 1107, 1108, 273, 331, 350, 382, 391, , 1095, 1074, 1110, 1016, 616, 682, 822, 582, 445, 799, 923, 426, 1100. Not bad for a five-person IRC channel. ;-) Hi, just as a little post-contribution from me (I was out of office all the day and couldn't join :( the bug day), all the links to the fixed bugs for lazy click-and-view-people like me: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1105 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1107 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1108 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/273 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/331 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/350 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/382 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/391 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/ http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1095 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1074 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1110 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1016 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/616 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/682 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/822 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/582 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/445 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/799 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/923 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/426 http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1100 Cheers, Maik ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] bugday results.
Bugs squashed: 22 1105, 1107, 1108, 273, 331, 350, 382, 391, , 1095, 1074, 1110, 1016, 616, 682, 822, 582, 445, 799, 923, 426, 1100. Not bad for a five-person IRC channel. ;-) - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
RE: [Zope-dev] Zope doesn't know enough mime types.
Chris McDonough writes: > I was thinking that too after I did it. ;-) I'll move it to > Zope.Startup. Cool. I'll be so bold as to suggest using a separate ZConfig component instead of sticking the section definition in the main schema. If you define the section type in warningfilter.xml, import it using in the main schema. Any datatype or handler functions can then be in a separate module within Zope.Startup as well, keeping it nicely compartmentalized. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. PythonLabs at Zope Corporation ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
RE: [Zope-dev] Zope doesn't know enough mime types.
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:22, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > Chris McDonough writes: > > Thats where I defined the sectiontype. > > I don't think it belongs there; it really has nothing to do with the > logging. I was thinking that too after I did it. ;-) I'll move it to Zope.Startup. - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
RE: [Zope-dev] Zope doesn't know enough mime types.
Chris McDonough writes: > Thats where I defined the sectiontype. I don't think it belongs there; it really has nothing to do with the logging. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. PythonLabs at Zope Corporation ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
RE: [Zope-dev] Zope doesn't know enough mime types.
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:06, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > > It would be nice to have all the config stuff the same on HEAD as on 2.7 > > so we don't run into merge problems later... If we agree and I promise > > to write a test for the warnfilter, maybe you could just copy the > > Have you written these tests yet? No... > > zconfig schemas and datatype files from the HEAD for the Zope.Startup > > package and the zLOG package and merge that way instead of surgically > > porting the mimetypes stuff to the 2.7 branch. The zope.conf.in file > > needs to be merged as well. > > What was affected in zLOG? Thats where I defined the sectiontype. > I'm glad to port these features to Zope 2.7 if you've got the tests > ready and Brian thinks that makes sense. OK, I'll try to do that today. - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
RE: [Zope-dev] Zope doesn't know enough mime types.
Chris McDonough writes: > Oo, oo, Fred. I just checked in a feature on the HEAD only that lets > you configure Python warning filters using the config file. I think it > passes Brian's criterion for merge save for any tests. The MIME types support now passes Brian's criteria; I finally added a stanza to the zope.conf.in file that describes it. > It would be nice to have all the config stuff the same on HEAD as on 2.7 > so we don't run into merge problems later... If we agree and I promise > to write a test for the warnfilter, maybe you could just copy the Have you written these tests yet? > zconfig schemas and datatype files from the HEAD for the Zope.Startup > package and the zLOG package and merge that way instead of surgically > porting the mimetypes stuff to the 2.7 branch. The zope.conf.in file > needs to be merged as well. What was affected in zLOG? I'm glad to port these features to Zope 2.7 if you've got the tests ready and Brian thinks that makes sense. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. PythonLabs at Zope Corporation ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] ZODB object upgrades
Thanks for the reply, you've raised a couple of points I need clarification upon... Attributes added to product code are not automatically present in the objects defined by that code, only those created by that code. Methods, however, will be present on all instances of a given class. I won't bother to connect the dots for you. These attrubutes whilst not stored in ZODB *are* still available as the persistent data is bound to the class during the setstate call. Is this not so?? Are you sure that you have a product for all those potential orphans out there? Otherwise, the above won't work: you'll need to look for distinct signature somehow, presuming those objects even function: I don't know how true orphans behave. Yes, if I am to believe the Logger in that it's not throwing up any nasty ZODB messages as it's unpickling all the storage. So, has anyone got some ingenious way to upgrade this persistent data into the new object type?? Cheers, Alan _ Gaming galore at http://xtramsn.co.nz/gaming ! ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
