[Zope-dev] Re: ZPT: defer expression fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Heimes wrote: > Dieter Maurer wrote: > >> Maybe, the feature could get documented as well... >> >> An undocumented feature is only half valuable... > > > +1 > > Is there anybody out there who can help me with the docs? I need someone > to translate my english into real and nice english and someone with the > permissions to update the ZPT docs at zope.org. I'd be glad to help with that, Christian. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver[EMAIL PROTECTED] Zope Corporation "Zope Dealers" http://www.zope.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCTxsxGqWXf00rNCgRAlBWAJ0bRNxSl988o6bADBS26kiNfdcRfwCbBSZU O211nz1gkQeJA6W/99vPhmM= =UYLo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope2.8a2] ...to be released by tomorrow....
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: > Hi Tres! > > > Tres Seaver wrote: > >> Please try the patch I just checked in: >> >> http://svn.zope.org/Zope/?rev=29821&sortby=date&view=rev > > > Thanks! This resolves issue #1460. Merged it into the trunk to get it > into the alpha 2 release, hope that's ok. > >> There may be additional issues (e.g., Stuart Bishop's "checked >> __getitem__" use case), but this makes the test script and the CMF work >> for me. > > > I still have a notion that some improvements made on the 2.7 branch are > not merged into the SVN trunk, e.g. > http://cvs.zope.org/Zope/lib/python/AccessControl/Attic/ZopeGuards.py.diff?r1=1.16.2.3&r2=1.16.2.4 There is some debate here whether those changes (which Jim made only relunctantly back in January 2004) should be promulgated to 2.8. We will fold them in after the alpha, if so. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver[EMAIL PROTECTED] Zope Corporation "Zope Dealers" http://www.zope.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCTxjaGqWXf00rNCgRAjKKAKCGXAyHBngiB+Q2Fw4HGK4/sv1ZcQCdFq9J WGDBkybeCWQ9/GgGW9sj4ck= =HVcX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] OS X 10.3.8 + mount_webdav + Zope all on powerbook
Florent Guillaume wrote: But why oh why are you useing mount_webdav for Zope's files ? In the best case it would still slow down things immensely. Because I am using vim, which in comparison to cadaver, can be configured to recognize extensions in from of *_html *_py and *_sql. Because I can use grep and find and other unix tools to locate stuff that i need. Because I am a power unix user and cadaver strips away everything I know about file manipulation. regards, pavel ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: ZPT: defer expression fix
Evan Simpson wrote: Christian Heimes wrote: * DeferWrapper didn't cache the result of the expression like ordinary vars do. This was intended, though you couldn't know that since I never documented this. Consider the following terrible example: This should evaluate to: x is 0 x is 1 x is 2 Why?? I don't remember why I wanted this behavior; it was an experiment, and I can't find any code of mine that uses it. That's an interessting use case. Do you want me to keep the code and make up a new expression? I'm thinking about "lazy:". Christian ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: ZPT: defer expression fix
Dieter Maurer wrote: Maybe, the feature could get documented as well... An undocumented feature is only half valuable... +1 Is there anybody out there who can help me with the docs? I need someone to translate my english into real and nice english and someone with the permissions to update the ZPT docs at zope.org. Christian ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] OS X 10.3.8 + mount_webdav + Zope all on powerbook
But why oh why are you useing mount_webdav for Zope's files ? In the best case it would still slow down things immensely. Florent Pavel Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good evening(or morning?);-), > I am just wondering if any of you have such installation, I am having > problems with OS X because of Zope behaviour of HTTPRequest and cgi.py > it uses for FieldStorage which in turn uses TemporaryFile. I need > responses only from people that have OS X 10.3.8, zope 2.7+ mounted via > mount_webdav... I wish to cross notes before nuking my installation and > redoing the install, testing for the bug and filing it with apple. > Problem is that when using mount_webdav agains zope, mount_webdav is > much too verbose and requests status for every entity in the directory, > invoking HTTPRequest and thus creating at least one temporary file per > listed. When sporradically browsing the mount point, zope comes in > conflict with some internal locks on the filesystem access that webdav > places... > that is speculation from my experience. Open call never returns, I have > made tracebacks when the system stalls. Zope administrator process kill > the instance that does not respond to however it is being queried being > alive .. but its gone into the kernel and no threads are running, so it > is killed off and new instance of zope satisfies the webdav request > minuetes later ... everything comes back to life... > I think I will modify cgi.py and release a patch so it does not use disk > based files maybe just pseudo memory files. > > So please post if you run zope and os x with webdav mount in tandem > please... > much thanks, > pavel > ___ > Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) > -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope2.8a2] ...to be released by tomorrow....
Hi Tres! Tres Seaver wrote: Please try the patch I just checked in: http://svn.zope.org/Zope/?rev=29821&sortby=date&view=rev Thanks! This resolves issue #1460. Merged it into the trunk to get it into the alpha 2 release, hope that's ok. There may be additional issues (e.g., Stuart Bishop's "checked __getitem__" use case), but this makes the test script and the CMF work for me. I still have a notion that some improvements made on the 2.7 branch are not merged into the SVN trunk, e.g. http://cvs.zope.org/Zope/lib/python/AccessControl/Attic/ZopeGuards.py.diff?r1=1.16.2.3&r2=1.16.2.4 Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )