[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope2] ZODB load optimization ineffective due to ExtensionClass flaw

2006-03-08 Thread Jim Fulton

Dieter Maurer wrote:

The ZODB allows to include the class (a reference to it)
into persistent references in order to avoid loading the object
state when a ghost object needs
to be created for the persistent reference.

For this to work, the class must not require arguments to "__new__".
The ZODB checks whether the class defines a "__getnewargs__" method.
It it does, the ZODB concludes that its "__new__" might need arguments
and does not try to optimize.

Unfortunately, "ExtensionClass.Base" defines "__getnewargs__".
It is the base class for all Zope2 classes. Zope2 persistent
references are not optimized...


An analysis of our application revealed that the missed
optimization opportunity increases the amount of storage loads
by a factor of 4 to 5. Storage loads are often the dominating
factor -- especially for searches.


@Jim:
Is the "__getnewargs__" definition in "ExtensionClass.Base" vital?
It returns the empty tuple. Thus, there seems to be a chance to
get rid of it.

I know that some code (especially in "ExtensionClass/picke/pickle.c")
needs to be changed as it depends on the existence of "__getnewargs__".

If you think, there is a chance to get rid of "__getnewargs__",
I can do the work and put the changes into the collector.

Zope2 might become a bit faster...


I'd have to review this, but I'm pretty sure that we dealt with this
issue, but I could be mistaken.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Re: http access to svn repos?

2006-03-08 Thread Jim Fulton

Mark Hammond wrote:

Chris quoting Jim:


...

whether SVN or not, I'm guessing any use of HTTP basic authentication
mechanism qualifies as "extremely lame"!  I've no idea if this is what Jim
meant though :)


OK, for those not familiar with svn/HTTP authentication, as I understand it
you have to authenticate for each session and your credentials are cached in
clear text in your home directory.  The storage of clear-text credentials
is obviously lame, as is the necessity to provide then for each svn session.

With the current ssh-based mechanism, I authenicate once when I log into
my machine and don't have to authenticate again for the remainder of that
OS session, during which I can log into many remote machines and access many
different Subversion and CVS repositories without having to reenter
credentials.  I find this to be a major convenience.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] [Zope2] ZODB load optimization ineffective due to ExtensionClass flaw

2006-03-08 Thread Dieter Maurer
The ZODB allows to include the class (a reference to it)
into persistent references in order to avoid loading the object
state when a ghost object needs
to be created for the persistent reference.

For this to work, the class must not require arguments to "__new__".
The ZODB checks whether the class defines a "__getnewargs__" method.
It it does, the ZODB concludes that its "__new__" might need arguments
and does not try to optimize.

Unfortunately, "ExtensionClass.Base" defines "__getnewargs__".
It is the base class for all Zope2 classes. Zope2 persistent
references are not optimized...


An analysis of our application revealed that the missed
optimization opportunity increases the amount of storage loads
by a factor of 4 to 5. Storage loads are often the dominating
factor -- especially for searches.


@Jim:
Is the "__getnewargs__" definition in "ExtensionClass.Base" vital?
It returns the empty tuple. Thus, there seems to be a chance to
get rid of it.

I know that some code (especially in "ExtensionClass/picke/pickle.c")
needs to be changed as it depends on the existence of "__getnewargs__".

If you think, there is a chance to get rid of "__getnewargs__",
I can do the work and put the changes into the collector.

Zope2 might become a bit faster...


-- 
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Re: http access to svn repos?

2006-03-08 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Mark Hammond schrieb:

Chris quoting Jim:



...



I would support HTTP anonymous checkouts.  I'm really against
writable HTTP checkouts because I consider the credentials
mechanism for HTTP access to be extremely lame.



whether SVN or not, I'm guessing any use of HTTP basic authentication
mechanism qualifies as "extremely lame"!  I've no idea if this is what Jim
meant though :)


Well, I hope ;) he meant client certificates. This is doable but a bit
of work for the certificate people to issue one to the user in addition
to the ssh-pubkey stuff. Not actually quite in line w/ what you should
do as a CA but possible and not more insecure then current ssh-pubkey
auth would be a script which can be run with the ssh-useraccount
and produces/registeres a given client certificate for that user.

Something like: ssh cert.zope.org generate >mycert.csr
when your ssh-pubkey is set up.

And likewise ssh cert.zope.org retract http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


RE: [Zope-dev] Re: http access to svn repos?

2006-03-08 Thread Mark Hammond
Chris quoting Jim:

> > lame program for uploading keys, I find the ssh-based access
> > mechanism to be far more usable and secure.
>
> Secure, maybe, but is it really worth it?
>
> Usable? Don't agree, especially if you're trying to develop on Windows...

As a data-point, for the last year or 2, I've had good success with putty's
ssh2 keys on Windows.

And quoting out-of-order, Jim wrote:

> I would support HTTP anonymous checkouts.  I'm really against
> writable HTTP checkouts because I consider the credentials
> mechanism for HTTP access to be extremely lame.

whether SVN or not, I'm guessing any use of HTTP basic authentication
mechanism qualifies as "extremely lame"!  I've no idea if this is what Jim
meant though :)

Cheers,

Mark

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Re: http access to svn repos?

2006-03-08 Thread Chris Withers

Jim Fulton wrote:

At one point, enabling the 'http:' checkout gateway was a sure-fire
recipe for getting SVN's knickers in a twist, which is why we disabled
it.  Or maybe that was ViewCSV.


Actually, it was BekeleyDB. :)


And Jens has fixed that now, iirc?


The main obstical was that it required apache 2 and, at the time
we were running apache 1 and I didn't want to spend the time
figuring out the apache access.


Is cvs.zope.org still running Apache 1?


I would support HTTP anonymous checkouts.  I'm really against
writable HTTP checkouts because I consider the credentials
mechanism for HTTP access to be extremely lame. 


Can you elaborate a little? I'm guessing you may mean that the 
subversion client has a propensity for storing cleartext passwords but 
is there anything else?



lame program for uploading keys, I find the ssh-based access
mechanism to be far more usable and secure.


Secure, maybe, but is it really worth it?

Usable? Don't agree, especially if you're trying to develop on Windows...

cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] http access to svn repos?

2006-03-08 Thread Chris Withers

Jim Fulton wrote:


Not in principle. In fact, I would find it convenient for a particular
project. I doubt that anyone with access to that machine has time, \
although I can only speak for myself.


If I could get access, I'd make time ;-)

I think I used to have it, and I may well still do, but I've forgotten 
what user I should "sudo su -" to in order to be able to do stuff with 
Apache...


What should I be trying?

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )