[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

2006-09-17 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux 
zc-buildbot.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7698
Blamelist: 
andreasjung,benji_york,chrism,ctheune,dobe,fdrake,flox,jim,jukart,mgedmin,poster,rogerineichen,srichter

BUILD FAILED: failed test

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

2006-09-17 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux 
zc-buildbot.

Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/

Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7699
Blamelist: andreasjung

BUILD FAILED: failed test

sincerely,
 -The Buildbot

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] WebDAV PUT factory tests failing on 2.10 branch

2006-09-17 Thread Andreas Jung
Those two tests are currently failing on the 2.10 branch (updated with the 
Zope 3.3.0rc1 code). Any hints?


Andreas

---


Error in test testSubfolderInsideOutVirtualHosting 
(webdav.tests.testPUT_factory.TestPUTFactory)

Traceback (most recent call last):
 File /opt/python-2.4.3/lib/python2.4/unittest.py, line 260, in run
   testMethod()
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/tests/testPUT_factory.py, 
line 66, in testSubfolderInsideOutVirtualHosting
   put = 
request.traverse('/VirtualHostBase/http/foo.com:80/folder/VirtualHostRoot/_vh_foo/doc')
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 463, in traverse

   subobject = self.traverseName(object, entry_name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 318, in traverseName

   ob2 = adapter.publishTraverse(self, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 77, in publishTraverse

   subobject=object.__bobo_traverse__(request, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/NullResource.py, line 
67, in __bobo_traverse__

   raise Conflict, 'Collection ancestors must already exist.'
Conflict: Collection ancestors must already exist.

.

Error in test testSubfolderVirtualHosting 
(webdav.tests.testPUT_factory.TestPUTFactory)

Traceback (most recent call last):
 File /opt/python-2.4.3/lib/python2.4/unittest.py, line 260, in run
   testMethod()
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/tests/testPUT_factory.py, 
line 54, in testSubfolderVirtualHosting
   put = 
request.traverse('/VirtualHostBase/http/foo.com:80/folder/VirtualHostRoot/doc')
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 463, in traverse

   subobject = self.traverseName(object, entry_name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 318, in traverseName

   ob2 = adapter.publishTraverse(self, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 77, in publishTraverse

   subobject=object.__bobo_traverse__(request, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/NullResource.py, line 
67, in __bobo_traverse__

   raise Conflict, 'Collection ancestors must already exist.'
Conflict: Collection ancestors must already exist.


pgpZh088kZsvm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Re: WebDAV PUT factory tests failing on 2.10 branch

2006-09-17 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
AFAIK, Stefan Hollek checked it in to demonstrate an incompatibility of 
Zope 2.10 vs. 2.9. See http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2187.



Andreas Jung wrote:
Those two tests are currently failing on the 2.10 branch (updated with 
the Zope 3.3.0rc1 code). Any hints?


Andreas

---


Error in test testSubfolderInsideOutVirtualHosting 
(webdav.tests.testPUT_factory.TestPUTFactory)

Traceback (most recent call last):
 File /opt/python-2.4.3/lib/python2.4/unittest.py, line 260, in run
   testMethod()
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/tests/testPUT_factory.py, 
line 66, in testSubfolderInsideOutVirtualHosting
   put = 
request.traverse('/VirtualHostBase/http/foo.com:80/folder/VirtualHostRoot/_vh_foo/doc') 

 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 463, in traverse

   subobject = self.traverseName(object, entry_name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 318, in traverseName

   ob2 = adapter.publishTraverse(self, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 77, in publishTraverse

   subobject=object.__bobo_traverse__(request, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/NullResource.py, 
line 67, in __bobo_traverse__

   raise Conflict, 'Collection ancestors must already exist.'
Conflict: Collection ancestors must already exist.

.

Error in test testSubfolderVirtualHosting 
(webdav.tests.testPUT_factory.TestPUTFactory)

Traceback (most recent call last):
 File /opt/python-2.4.3/lib/python2.4/unittest.py, line 260, in run
   testMethod()
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/tests/testPUT_factory.py, 
line 54, in testSubfolderVirtualHosting
   put = 
request.traverse('/VirtualHostBase/http/foo.com:80/folder/VirtualHostRoot/doc') 

 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 463, in traverse

   subobject = self.traverseName(object, entry_name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 318, in traverseName

   ob2 = adapter.publishTraverse(self, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/BaseRequest.py, 
line 77, in publishTraverse

   subobject=object.__bobo_traverse__(request, name)
 File 
/develop/sandboxes/Zope-2.10/Zope/lib/python/webdav/NullResource.py, 
line 67, in __bobo_traverse__

   raise Conflict, 'Collection ancestors must already exist.'
Conflict: Collection ancestors must already exist.




___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Sidnei da Silva
I remember having a conversation with Jim at some point where he
proposed a strategy for requests that could potentially take a long
time to finish. If I recall correctly, he proposed having a separate
ZODB connection pool.

One thing that is problematic today is serving large files
from the ZODB (ignoring the upcoming blob support).

a) You can't return an iterator that reads from the ZODB, because by
   the time the iterator is consumed the connection has already been
   closed. I believe the iterator is not consumed in the same thread,
   which can cause yet more issues.

b) If you dump the data to a temp file and return that as a file
   iterator, it can potentially take twice the time.

c) If you use RESPONSE.write() you can break other
   applications. ExternalEditor comes to mind.

d) If you just return the file as a string you can potentially run out
   of memory if the file is too big.

I would like to be able to return an iterator that can read from the
ZODB. That would probably benefit the WSGI integration as well. Anyone
has ideas about how to solve this?

-- 
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Sidnei da Silva schrieb:

I remember having a conversation with Jim at some point where he
proposed a strategy for requests that could potentially take a long
time to finish. If I recall correctly, he proposed having a separate
ZODB connection pool.

One thing that is problematic today is serving large files
from the ZODB (ignoring the upcoming blob support).

a) You can't return an iterator that reads from the ZODB, because by
   the time the iterator is consumed the connection has already been
   closed. I believe the iterator is not consumed in the same thread,
   which can cause yet more issues.

...


I would like to be able to return an iterator that can read from the
ZODB. That would probably benefit the WSGI integration as well. Anyone
has ideas about how to solve this?



It should be possible to feed a fifo (at least on unix) and reopen the
connection each time via publisher or something alike (similar to the
retry mechanism on database conflicts) and fill the buffer again.

Regards
Tino
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

Sidnei da Silva wrote:
 I remember having a conversation with Jim at some point where he
 proposed a strategy for requests that could potentially take a long
 time to finish. If I recall correctly, he proposed having a separate
 ZODB connection pool.
 
 One thing that is problematic today is serving large files
 from the ZODB (ignoring the upcoming blob support).
 
 a) You can't return an iterator that reads from the ZODB, because by
the time the iterator is consumed the connection has already been
closed. I believe the iterator is not consumed in the same thread,
which can cause yet more issues.
 
 b) If you dump the data to a temp file and return that as a file
iterator, it can potentially take twice the time.
 
 c) If you use RESPONSE.write() you can break other
applications. ExternalEditor comes to mind.
 
 d) If you just return the file as a string you can potentially run out
of memory if the file is too big.
 
 I would like to be able to return an iterator that can read from the
 ZODB. That would probably benefit the WSGI integration as well. Anyone
 has ideas about how to solve this?

I wonder whether this statement is true:

   Any connection handed out after the connection breaks the ACID
   compliance of the request.

I think this is because:

   When finishing the actual work we have to either commit or abort the
   running transaction.

   In the time until we set up another transaction, there already might
   have been a change to the database by a third transaction, making the
   request neither isolated nor atomic.

My statement is probably only true for all solutions not paying
attention to the statement. ;)

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 09:24:40PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
| I wonder whether this statement is true:
| 
|Any connection handed out after the connection breaks the ACID
|compliance of the request.
| 
| I think this is because:
| 
|When finishing the actual work we have to either commit or abort the
|running transaction.
| 
|In the time until we set up another transaction, there already might
|have been a change to the database by a third transaction, making the
|request neither isolated nor atomic.

Suppose the request finishes with 'tid=X' and that it should be
possible to open a read-only connection which would be a snaphsot of
the database at 'tid=X'?

-- 
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Christian Theune


Sidnei da Silva wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 09:24:40PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
 | I wonder whether this statement is true:
 | 
 |Any connection handed out after the connection breaks the ACID
 |compliance of the request.
 | 
 | I think this is because:
 | 
 |When finishing the actual work we have to either commit or abort the
 |running transaction.
 | 
 |In the time until we set up another transaction, there already might
 |have been a change to the database by a third transaction, making the
 |request neither isolated nor atomic.
 
 Suppose the request finishes with 'tid=X' and that it should be
 possible to open a read-only connection which would be a snaphsot of
 the database at 'tid=X'?

Jup. That's what I was thinking about. But what then. Then you end up
again with application code that needs to do work. (In the iterator.)

The thing about the iterator is that currently (I think) it is assumed
that all resources are cleaned up by GC.

If you do this however, I suspect you have to do work to get rid of the
resources you allocated (a transaction, a connection, ...)

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh  co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )