[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.file/trunk/ Make a good package out of this package.

2007-11-07 Thread Bernd Dorn


On 02.11.2007, at 15:43, Benji York wrote:


Stephan Richter wrote:
zope.file was the *only* package of the 150+ I worked on that did  
not have extras.


I'm surprised.  I thought it was generally agreed upon not to do  
that. Darn.


no - afaik there is no agreement upon this, and imho it is not good  
to put extras in the general deps because one always ends up fetching  
all the zope packages as deps if using any zope.* package


-100 from me for removing extras




--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Checkins mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins


--
Lovely Systems, senior developer

phone: +43 5572 908060, fax: +43 5572 908060-77
Schmelzhütterstraße 26a, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria
skype: bernd.dorn



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Duplicate directive registration allowed

2007-11-07 Thread Malthe Borch
In zope/configuration/config.py:register it seems that it isn't being
asserted that no previous registration of a directive with the same
name has happened.

This might be desirable (not sure why) and currently happens for these
directives:

('http://namespaces.zope.org/meta', u'directive')
('http://namespaces.zope.org/meta', u'groupingDirective')
('http://namespaces.zope.org/meta', u'complexDirective')
('http://namespaces.zope.org/zope', u'securityPolicy')

This is on Zope 2.10.

So for instance, if Five registers the  then there's
nothing to prevent another package from including zope.viewlet's
meta.zcml which will then override that directive, breaking viewlet
support on Zope 2.10.

\malthe
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.3 common criteria derivative

2007-11-07 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2007, 10:03 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s "Sharing" security  
> > policy.
> > I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release  
> > to be
> > evaluated.
> 
> I'm sad to say that, while I still like this security policy, we're  
> no longer using it, which probably means no one is using it.

I already somewhat suspected that but I do think it's still useful and
I'll continue using it for the sake of getting done.


> I apologize for pointing you in that direction. I sadly recommend using  
> the standard security policy. Of course, you're welcome to keep using  
> the sharing security policy. maybe that's easier at this point.

No worries.

I feel the same and except from deriving from the standard back then
nobody could have predicted this. I *was* thinking about switching but
that would make me rewrite large parts. I'll go down that road.

Thanks for the heads-up!

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.3 common criteria derivative

2007-11-07 Thread Jim Fulton


On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Christian Theune wrote:


Hi,

the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s "Sharing" security  
policy.
I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release  
to be

evaluated.


I'm sad to say that, while I still like this security policy, we're  
no longer using it, which probably means no one is using it.  I  
apologize for pointing you in that direction. I sadly recommend using  
the standard security policy. Of course, you're welcome to keep using  
the sharing security policy. maybe that's easier at this point.


Jim

--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2007-11-07 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Nov  6 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Nov  7 13:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Nov  6 20:53:19 EST 2007
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-November/008606.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Nov  6 20:54:49 EST 2007
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-November/008607.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Nov  6 20:56:20 EST 2007
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-November/008608.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Nov  6 20:57:50 EST 2007
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-November/008609.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Nov  6 20:59:20 EST 2007
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-November/008610.html

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.3 common criteria derivative

2007-11-07 Thread Christian Theune
Hey,

Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2007, 06:04 -0500 schrieb Stephan Richter:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> > A name proposal would be "Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition". The question
> > would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
> > start from the version number of Zope 3.3 that it was built on.
> 
> I think it would be okay to start at 1.0; It is a important accomplishment 
> and 
> would confuse people less, I think.
> 
> My question would be, with Zope being split into packages now, would it not 
> be 
> easier to do the security evaluation based on a set of eggs? It would entail 
> less code that needs to be reviewed.

Yes it would be but we're way too far down the road and really just want
to get finished what we started.

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.3 common criteria derivative

2007-11-07 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> A name proposal would be "Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition". The question
> would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
> start from the version number of Zope 3.3 that it was built on.

I think it would be okay to start at 1.0; It is a important accomplishment and 
would confuse people less, I think.

My question would be, with Zope being split into packages now, would it not be 
easier to do the security evaluation based on a set of eggs? It would entail 
less code that needs to be reviewed.

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Location of common criteria documentation

2007-11-07 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> we're (still/again/...) working on the common criteria project. We're in
> a mode to try to finish it up and get done with.

Yipee.

> I feel that Zope3/trunk/doc/security is not the right location for those
> documents. I'd move them to a top level project in svn or something like
> Zope3/common-criteria/.

I would prefer a top level directory, like "common-criteria".

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope 3.3 common criteria derivative

2007-11-07 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s "Sharing" security policy.
I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release to be
evaluated.

The most straight forward thing I can think of is to create a branch
derived from the 3.3 release series that includes zc.sharing and is
configured for using it in the common criteria evaluated way.

A name proposal would be "Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition". The question
would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
start from the version number of Zope 3.3 that it was built on.

Comments?

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Location of common criteria documentation

2007-11-07 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

we're (still/again/...) working on the common criteria project. We're in
a mode to try to finish it up and get done with.

I feel that Zope3/trunk/doc/security is not the right location for those
documents. I'd move them to a top level project in svn or something like
Zope3/common-criteria/.

Oppinions?

Christian

-- 
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )