Re: [Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks
On 10/12/09 01:22 , Fabio Tranchitella wrote: Hello, * 2009-10-09 15:37, Martijn Faassen wrote: I'm okay with *not* doing the split up and going with your idea, but I think eventually such a split up would simplify things. One advantage would be that someone could examine repoze.zcml and not see distracting ZCML implementations in zope.component *too*. I may be wrong, but I suppose the dependency on zope.security in zope.component is the only reason why repoze.zcml is around. Perhaps it is an idea to make zope.component an extension for repoze.zcml? repoze.zcml already exists and works well, and people who want the extra zope magic can keep using zope.component. I suspect that is less work than trying to split up zope.component. Wichert. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks
* 2009-10-12 08:55, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Perhaps it is an idea to make zope.component an extension for repoze.zcml? repoze.zcml already exists and works well, and people who want the extra zope magic can keep using zope.component. I suspect that is less work than trying to split up zope.component. repoze.zcml uses a different ZCML namespace (bfg), so you cannot replace zope.component.zcml with repoze.zcml without changing your code. Fabio ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] five.localsitemanager and unregisterUtility
Am 09.10.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Hanno Schlichting: Hi Sylvain. I'm including Michael here, who's added the mentioned feature in the first place. On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote: I used to use those features in Silva. It work well with 0.4, but it's broken in 1.x. (I have tests in Silva testing that). This have to do with the wrapping (to remember the acquisition path) of an utility which is done inside the registry by registerUtility, which breaks the unregisterUtility. unregisterUtility is checking that the component you want to unregister is the same than the one which is in the registry, for the same specification, which is not true, because the one in the registry in wrapped with a ComponentPathWrapper (in register). It seems that I overlooked the unregisterUtility functionality when implementing that registerUtility stores the acquisition path. If you do grep unregisterUtility in five.localsitemanager, you have no match, but the site API defines both, so they should both works (and so be tested). I volunteer myself to add test (and fix it) in the SVN, as I need that fix. Does anyone have an objection with that ? No objection, please go ahead. + 1 Does any official maintainer will do a release (1.1.1, as it will be a bug fix) afterwards ? Sure, ping me once you are done and I'll cut a new release. Michael, do you want to test anything, before I do a new release? For me it's enough that the tests inside five.localsitemanager succeed. Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · m...@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] ZODB Competing read/writes: How to find out which attribute?
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote: ... Sadly, the ZODB doesn't track backreferences, so there only way to find out for sure what points to your object is to do a full graph traversal. The zc.zodbdgc package has a database verification scripts that optionally creates a backreference database. Jim -- Jim Fulton ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Oct 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Oct 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 20:47:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012760.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 20:49:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012761.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 20:51:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012762.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 20:53:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012763.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 20:55:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012764.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 20:57:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012765.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 20:59:52 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012766.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 11 21:01:52 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-October/012767.html ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Is it all right to merge for unicodeSpliting at ZCTextIndex?
I would like to merge the following change to the trunk. svn diff -r 104723:104761 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tyam-unicodeSplitterPatch This change is to add a hook for proper text indexing for Ease Asian Languages(CJK). Is it all right to merge this? Thank you in advance. Takeshi Yamamoto ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Is it all right to merge for unicodeSpliting at ZCTextIndex?
Takeshi Yamamoto wrote: I would like to merge the following change to the trunk. svn diff -r 104723:104761 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tyam-unicodeSplitterPatch This change is to add a hook for proper text indexing for Ease Asian Languages(CJK). Is it all right to merge this? Don't you actually want to merge it to the 2.12 branch? David ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Is it all right to merge for unicodeSpliting at ZCTextIndex?
I would like to make this change effective as soon as possible. So, hopefully to the 2.12.1. I thought applying to the trunk is the fastest way to do so. Takeshi On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:19 AM, David Glick wrote: Takeshi Yamamoto wrote: I would like to merge the following change to the trunk. svn diff -r 104723:104761 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tyam-unicodeSplitterPatch This change is to add a hook for proper text indexing for Ease Asian Languages(CJK). Is it all right to merge this? Don't you actually want to merge it to the 2.12 branch? David ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Is it all right to merge for unicodeSpliting at ZCTextIndex?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Takeshi Yamamoto t...@mac.com wrote: I would like to make this change effective as soon as possible. So, hopefully to the 2.12.1. There's both a maintenance branch for 2.12 and trunk (which will become 2.13). I'm +1 on merging. It looks simple enough and I know it makes proper east-asian indexing support possible in Plone. Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks
Fabio Tranchitella wrote: * 2009-10-12 08:55, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Perhaps it is an idea to make zope.component an extension for repoze.zcml? repoze.zcml already exists and works well, and people who want the extra zope magic can keep using zope.component. I suspect that is less work than trying to split up zope.component. repoze.zcml uses a different ZCML namespace (bfg), so you cannot replace zope.component.zcml with repoze.zcml without changing your code. repoze.zcml is stupid simple; its only actual value is 100% test coverage, so cutting and pasting its code will always make sense as necessary. But FTR, using a different ZCML namespace would be fixed by having a different meta-ZCML file for meta configuration in any other package. That meta-ZCML file would just copy the meta.zcml from repoze.zcml and change: meta:directives namespace=http://namespaces.repoze.org/bfg; to: meta:directives namespace=http://namespaces.zope.org/zope; ... leaving everything else exactly as-is. OTOH, I don't know how to both give 100% BW compat and have the zope namespace be the default for the adapter/utility/subscriber directives. - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Is it all right to merge for unicodeSpliting at ZCTextIndex?
Am 12.10.09 18:11, schrieb Takeshi Yamamoto: I would like to merge the following change to the trunk. svn diff -r 104723:104761 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/tyam-unicodeSplitterPatch This change is to add a hook for proper text indexing for Ease Asian Languages(CJK). Is it all right to merge this? go ahead. Andreas attachment: lists.vcf___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
