Re: [Zope-dev] (re)moving browser subpackage from zc.catalog?
Am 05.10.2010 um 20:21 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman: Hi, Today I fixed a small bug in zc.catalog (the ftesting.zcml depended on a permission name that has been removed from zope.dublincore). Actually the permission has been renamed (from zope.app.dublincore to zope.dublincore) to get rid of the app part in its name. This made me realize that zc.catalog contains ZMI code in the browser subpackage. Are people still using this ZMI code from zc.catalog? Would it be an idea to move the ZMI code out of the package (a bit similar to how various zope.app.* package have been refactored)? It would make maintaining this package in respect to the ZTK easier. zc.catalog has only test dependencies on zope.app.* packages. So you do not install these dependencies when using zc.calalog as a library. The zope.app.* dependencies might need a bit polishing. But I do not see a big win moving the browser part into a separate package. Especially as zc.catalog should depend on this new package for backward compatibility reasons (at least for a while). Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · m...@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.recipe.i18n
Hi! Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote: This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make it possible to move grok and the groktoolkit over to zc.buildout-1.5.1. I guess this is also useful in the light of moving the ZTK itself to zc.buildout 1.5.1 at some point. Unless there are objections of course :) +1 But could you please make it more explicit that 0.8.0 drops support for zc.buildout 1.4? Your CHANGES.txt note is not clear about that and maybe install_requires should specify the new requirement explicitly. BTW: I just fixed some failing tests on Windows. Hope that doesn't mask any real issues. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.recipe.i18n
On 10/6/10 09:53 , yuppie wrote: Hi! Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote: This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make it possible to move grok and the groktoolkit over to zc.buildout-1.5.1. I guess this is also useful in the light of moving the ZTK itself to zc.buildout 1.5.1 at some point. Unless there are objections of course :) +1 But could you please make it more explicit that 0.8.0 drops support for zc.buildout 1.4? Your CHANGES.txt note is not clear about that and maybe install_requires should specify the new requirement explicitly. I'ld even go so far as to say install_requires must specify such a requirement. Wichert. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.recipe.i18n
On 10/6/10 9:53 AM, yuppie wrote: Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote: This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make it possible to move grok and the groktoolkit over to zc.buildout-1.5.1. I guess this is also useful in the light of moving the ZTK itself to zc.buildout 1.5.1 at some point. Unless there are objections of course :) +1 But could you please make it more explicit that 0.8.0 drops support for zc.buildout 1.4? Your CHANGES.txt note is not clear about that and maybe install_requires should specify the new requirement explicitly. Yes, agreed. regards, jw ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.recipe.compattest buildout 1.5/1.4 compatibility
* Jan-Jaap Driessen jdries...@thehealthagency.com [2010-10-05 18:09]: Version 0.12.2 of z3c.recipe.compattest is not compatible with recent versions of it's dependencies zc.buildout (v1.5.1), zc.recipe.egg (v1.3.2) and z3c.recipe.scripts. I fixed this in revision 117253. Is it OK with you to drop compatibility with zc.buildout versions 1.5 in the next release of z3c.recipe.compattest? I'm a little confused what's going on here. Could you explain this with a bit more details? I think my main questions are - Where and when, exactly, did which API change (it's related to recipe options AFAICT from the diff) - What does this have to do with buildout 1.5? - Is it a) really the case and b) intentional that buildout 1.5 breaks compatibility with 1.4? (Thus, can't this be avoided, possibly by fixing buildout 1.5?) I'm all for moving forward, but I don't really understand why the 1.5-update should cause such compatibility breakage. Wolfgang ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.recipe.compattest buildout 1.5/1.4 compatibility
On 10/6/10 12:49 PM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: * Jan-Jaap Driessenjdries...@thehealthagency.com [2010-10-05 18:09]: Version 0.12.2 of z3c.recipe.compattest is not compatible with recent versions of it's dependencies zc.buildout (v1.5.1), zc.recipe.egg (v1.3.2) and z3c.recipe.scripts. I fixed this in revision 117253. Is it OK with you to drop compatibility with zc.buildout versions 1.5 in the next release of z3c.recipe.compattest? I'm a little confused what's going on here. Could you explain this with a bit more details? I think my main questions are - Where and when, exactly, did which API change (it's related to recipe options AFAICT from the diff) - What does this have to do with buildout 1.5? - Is it a) really the case and b) intentional that buildout 1.5 breaks compatibility with 1.4? (Thus, can't this be avoided, possibly by fixing buildout 1.5?) I'm all for moving forward, but I don't really understand why the 1.5-update should cause such compatibility breakage. I think in this particular case z3c.recipe.compattest relied on zc.buildout internals that now have have changed. So, no, I do not think it really is an API change and as such it is not intentional breakage nor something that __should__ be fixed in buildout. Ideally, z3c.recipe.compattest would be fixed in such a way that is does make use of official buildout APIs. Still there's the case that quite some recipes need to be updated to zc.buildout 1.5.x if they want to use its new features (system python support). Grok would really like to (easing beginners-installation for example). That's why we try to fix this recipes. BTW, I discussed updating the z3c.recipe.i18n for similar reasons - to support newer buildout features - in a separate thread. There people seemed to be +1 on releasing a recipe that declares its minimal buildout version requirement to be = 1.5.1. Would you say that that situation is similar to this? Thanks for your feedback. regards, jw ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 42 OK, 8 Failed
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Oct 5 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Oct 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 50 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 20 from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 9 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com. Test failures - Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:19:16 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021120.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:28:02 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021121.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:37:24 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021122.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:46:17 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021123.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:56:23 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021124.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:21:43 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021127.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:43:39 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021136.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Oct 6 05:19:12 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021169.html Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:06:02 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021125.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:14:45 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021126.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:23:08 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021128.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:26:07 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021129.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:28:08 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021130.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:31:49 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021131.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:32:46 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021132.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:33:19 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021133.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:35:26 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021134.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:39:56 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021135.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:53:51 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021137.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 18:04:57 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021138.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 18:16:24 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021139.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 18:28:02 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021140.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 18:39:07 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021141.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 19:35:51 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021142.html Subject:
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 42 OK, 8 Failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The first five failures appear to be related to the same cause. Test failures - Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:19:16 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021120.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:28:02 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021121.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:37:24 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021122.html This appears to be a newline normalization issue in the doctests for zope.testrunner: somebody who can test a fix on both Windows and non-Windows should look at the flags passed to the failing tests. Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:46:17 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021123.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 16:56:23 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021124.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:21:43 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021127.html I couldn't view the test output on this one: the URL yields a 404. Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:43:39 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021136.html This one seems to be a non-Windows-specific zc.buildout test failure: I don't think we run those tests anywhere else. Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Oct 6 05:19:12 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021169.html The link for this one also 404s. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkysg6QACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7+AQCghNWEsha21L2liCrnT57A7qCw iUwAnj1o3kQH0du7P6iDhknlNVI8H6dJ =xvng -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 42 OK, 8 Failed
On 6 October 2010 16:11, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: snip Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Tue Oct 5 17:21:43 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021127.html I couldn't view the test output on this one: the URL yields a 404. My bad. I am upgrading this buildbot (more packages, python2.7). Back online soon. Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:43:39 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021136.html This one seems to be a non-Windows-specific zc.buildout test failure: I don't think we run those tests anywhere else. Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Oct 6 05:19:12 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021169.html The link for this one also 404s. Same same. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Design http://palladion.com ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 42 OK, 8 Failed
Hello Tres, Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Tue Oct 5 17:43:39 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021136.html TS This one seems to be a non-Windows-specific zc.buildout test failure: I TS don't think we run those tests anywhere else. Gary personally said about windows+python 2.4+zc.buildout: Just don't ask me. Either we just ignore this or I drop python 2.4. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZERmailto:agros...@gmail.com -- Quote of the day: As sure as God puts His children in the furnace of affliction, He will be with them in it. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 42 OK, 8 Failed
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote: Gary personally said about windows+python 2.4+zc.buildout: Just don't ask me. Either we just ignore this or I drop python 2.4. At least for zc,buildout 1.5+ I'd be fine to drop Python 2.4 test runs. We don't have zc.buildout in the ZTK 1.0, so it's fine not to support it. Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 42 OK, 8 Failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/06/2010 12:30 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote: Gary personally said about windows+python 2.4+zc.buildout: Just don't ask me. Either we just ignore this or I drop python 2.4. At least for zc,buildout 1.5+ I'd be fine to drop Python 2.4 test runs. We don't have zc.buildout in the ZTK 1.0, so it's fine not to support it. +1 for dropping the test: if we aren't going to try to fix it to pass, then scrap it. Note that I actually feel the same way about *all* the every-day failures: the value of the every-day mail drops sharply when there are any expected failures. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyspOgACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7FTgCfZMJ47mJI0nHpxEHbS02qln3L N0IAoJS3uXkySg+vQmktPS9GHgh441Br =2TH1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] adapter registry in other systems
thanks, i'll check it out! Regards ,jure On 10/05/2010 04:26 PM, Alan Runyan wrote: i've read martin's article http://www.martinaspeli.net/articles/a-java-component-architecture, where he mentions that java doesn't have an equivalent of zca's adapter registry. The article was written in 2007, so I was wondering if this still holds true? What about other platforms, maybe .NET? jure, my understanding is that OSGi comes pretty close to the ZCA in spirit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSGi cheers alan ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
