[Zope-dev] wiki.zope.org / download.zope.org down?
Hi, As it seems wiki.zope.org is down, as is download.zope.org. But probably this is already known..? Is there anything I can do to help getting the machine(s) back up? regards, jw ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] zc.buildout/buildout.org down - disaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, buildout.org is currently down and any existing buildout is trying to phone home to buildout.org (likely because buildout.org is configured in the package metadata as 'url'). Even releasing zc.buildout 1.5.2 with 'url' set to http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.buildout does not work as a workaround. First: is it setuptools or buildout ignoring the new 'url'? Second: how to fix this finally? There is jarn.setuptoolsfixer claiming to resolve exactly this issue but it does not seem to have any effect (at least not in combination with buildout). Andreas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGUBAEBAgAGBQJMss/ZAAoJEADcfz7u4AZjRD8Lv1RI0vwrvktm1Y5whFB2LcT+ gC4c6rbavXXxtVCCH9nEB9f0Fl3NNVAarO6mR8Td1hr8zCUVn/40d/jDpyqkliqo AVGK8GI9ap4xjIRr6avT6zbKvKWJRS33veBrNUUmEF24If9U/YGCxJHEYI+mgmT/ 3JU1E46ByRoqdHnSxd7iRBZdvGG3YGYgx5NRViTntur7/wWOW/iwtVwzZEUReoAL 90t9Yh377qdEY4CCkRTRNDqXtT4Bq1ENBBzwLXaDLU60cERue2+zb1K9GBZ9FGn+ qWNy3FMqm5DcNuQrd11B47jRTxQON+YGvbLezijCeDCn18agS2cFk9W9Ar8Hwp7i 41h2EvgG4i0R11nzC3xlURvfTHIsCVVNqpxH18TFTjSmZKt7kS322tGyJlZkBKKE yyOhka2QDGbgCNpcwi9umvwiGond38xp3qRVz4mHOoShyoEo4gbubBluohOeTULw rbQ+8Ld6I6iRRXc+QRhxo/fu/sLPMWA= =lMwq -END PGP SIGNATURE- attachment: lists.vcf___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildout.org down/setuptools going mad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, since buildout.org is down right now (at least since the weekend) and since the stupid setuptools is trying blindly to contact buildout.org (because of the 'url' metadata) I uploaded zc.buildout==1.5.2 with a changed 'url' metadata (pointing to PyPI) as a temporary workaround. - -aj -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGUBAEBAgAGBQJMsr+JAAoJEADcfz7u4AZjJmALv2ChrwrnTn5xjZgxWgtxQ31o icCFe0mB5r4IjZxw74fiDgg4dwTMY//BNVw4G/uflj1e1AIGa8N+41T42wmygZIh it0AWY/ljcdxugEaz04DTM6FuvQqdY8hx8AwxNf6u2cmL6I6JzrNQiI3VBLXDfd0 zz7Y9bVAo2e96wIr6Xt+ZFiR67GUjH4zq8nUD4iv6Q8gTQ+LKps3Zt6h8lr9XEPp WQEn5LvmUCfpgsrPN4eKTnYU5qi5lLlOpg5YcTH6OZQk4VZA6cC667D5EISQZpWu WgI9F6LlRW5xvj5vTQFqmMwK0AaSW7e61BoiC3vLYK76MKWrUQj86Qtav0OU3bao wBrqzcB7/vOEllinlNDzhXT/OsA2knecjYKeKvQWcLZ9m1B8FpoQOACU/4zg3G0Q TMLAuDKgUMbgmm0+J3el70VBqLyQE1J0g+2Ww3kyL+Py/6F44djsm4pvcjafAxLT Jyfb5BzHkO6tn4NsRQpztAwMpU8Xt+Y= =U7ho -END PGP SIGNATURE- attachment: lists.vcf___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 24 OK, 15 Failed, 2 Unknown
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Oct 10 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Oct 11 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 41 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 20 from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr. Test failures - Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 16:19:15 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021373.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 16:28:27 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021368.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 16:37:48 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021357.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 16:46:45 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021355.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 16:56:21 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021362.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 17:51:35 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021371.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 18:10:50 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021380.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 18:31:11 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021359.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 18:51:19 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021356.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 19:11:50 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021381.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 19:32:02 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021374.html Subject: FAILED : Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Oct 10 22:03:35 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021384.html Subject: FAILED : Bluebream / Python2.6.5 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Oct 10 22:03:36 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021360.html Subject: FAILED : Bluebream / Python2.4.6 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Oct 10 22:03:37 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021367.html Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Mon Oct 11 00:05:05 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021372.html Unknown --- Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 10 21:53:05 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021344.html Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 10 21:55:05 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021345.html Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 17:06:52 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021382.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 17:15:39 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021353.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 17:23:59 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021364.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 17:32:37 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021378.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Oct 10 19:44:40 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021370.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Oct 10 19:45:06 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021361.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Oct 10 19:45:15 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021383.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sun Oct 10 20:29:38 EDT 2010 URL:
[Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 20% slower than Zope 2.9?!
Hi All, Just finished upgrading a medium sized project from Zope 2.9 to 2.12. One part of that does a batch of static copies of a Zope-served site. I guess I was hoping for a bit of a speed up, so was slightly horrified to see the batch, which used to take 11hrs, now takes 13 hrs. This has been the same for 2 or 3 days since I did the upgrade so I don't think it's a freak occurrence. The site is classic Zope 2: zodb-based python scripts and page templates building the UI from Product-based content objects. Have others shared this experience? cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 20% slower than Zope 2.9?!
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Just finished upgrading a medium sized project from Zope 2.9 to 2.12. One part of that does a batch of static copies of a Zope-served site. I guess I was hoping for a bit of a speed up, so was slightly horrified to see the batch, which used to take 11hrs, now takes 13 hrs. This has been the same for 2 or 3 days since I did the upgrade so I don't think it's a freak occurrence. Without actual profiling data it's hard to tell what time has increased here. Most of the components in Zope have stayed the same. Some of them like the ZODB have improved performance. My only guess here is that you are calling a lot of page templates and those have gotten slower. When we switched to Unicode based templates in Zope 2.10, that move has of course cost some performance. Dealing with Unicode instead of bytes is always slower. If you want to improve rendering times and your analysis shows page templates to be the problem, try Chameleon. Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 20% slower than Zope 2.9?!
On 11/10/2010 13:32, Hanno Schlichting wrote: My only guess here is that you are calling a lot of page templates and those have gotten slower. When we switched to Unicode based templates in Zope 2.10, that move has of course cost some performance. Dealing with Unicode instead of bytes is always slower. If you want to improve rendering times and your analysis shows page templates to be the problem, try Chameleon. Yes, this is my guess too. Are there any docs on how to get Chameleon to work with classic, ZODB-based page templates? Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 24 OK, 15 Failed, 2 Unknown
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Oct 10 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Oct 11 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 41 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 20 from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr. Test failures - Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Mon Oct 11 00:05:05 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-October/021372.html This is a funny one. Bootstrap/buildout was taking incredibly long, due to multiple timeouts, and then a cron script shut down the slave, to save power. Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 20% slower than Zope 2.9?!
On 10/11/10 5:39 AM, Chris Withers wrote: On 11/10/2010 13:32, Hanno Schlichting wrote: My only guess here is that you are calling a lot of page templates and those have gotten slower. When we switched to Unicode based templates in Zope 2.10, that move has of course cost some performance. Dealing with Unicode instead of bytes is always slower. If you want to improve rendering times and your analysis shows page templates to be the problem, try Chameleon. Yes, this is my guess too. Are there any docs on how to get Chameleon to work with classic, ZODB-based page templates? Just use cmf.pt: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/cmf.pt -- David Glick Web Developer davidgl...@groundwire.org 206.286.1235x32 Groundwire: You Are Connected http://groundwire.org We're celebrating 15 years! Come to our big party. http://groundwire.org/events/groundwires-15th-anniversary-party ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 20% slower than Zope 2.9?!
Try with a smaller batch (whatever you are doing) and profile it. I 100% agree with what ajung says. post a profile of your batch run that takes ~30 minutes. I would suspect its probably something inside framework you are using which is constantly querying ZCA. -alan ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 20% slower than Zope 2.9?!
On 11/10/2010 16:53, David Glick wrote: Are there any docs on how to get Chameleon to work with classic, ZODB-based page templates? Just use cmf.pt: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/cmf.pt Ah, okay, well, I'm not using anything CMF, so I opted for just five.pt. Unfortunately, this hits a unicode problem. The unicode problem I solved with an IUnicodeEncodingConflictResolver using the normal page template engine: class Resolver: implements(IUnicodeEncodingConflictResolver) def resolve(self, context, text, expression): return unicode(text,'latin-1') chameleon doesn't appear to use this, so I get: File five.pt-1.3.3-py2.6.egg/five/pt/patches.py, line 90, in call_template_and_wrap return template(self, *args, **kw) File z3c.pt-1.2.1-py2.6.egg/z3c/pt/pagetemplate.py, line 145, in __call__ return bound_pt(*args, **kwargs) File z3c.pt-1.2.1-py2.6.egg/z3c/pt/pagetemplate.py, line 262, in __call__ return self.im_func(**kw) File z3c.pt-1.2.1-py2.6.egg/z3c/pt/pagetemplate.py, line 136, in render return self.render(**context) File Chameleon-1.2.13-py2.6.egg/chameleon/zpt/template.py, line 17, in render return super(PageTemplate, self).render(*args, **kwargs) File Chameleon-1.2.13-py2.6.egg/chameleon/core/template.py, line 221, in render return self.cook_and_render(kwargs, utils.emptydict, None, True) File Chameleon-1.2.13-py2.6.egg/chameleon/core/template.py, line 205, in cook_and_render return func(econtext, rcontext) - __traceback_info__: (BaseTemplate ,) File string, line 79, in render UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xa3 in position 0: unexpected code byte What's the chameleon or z3c.pt way of dealing with this*? Chris *'this' is stacks of ZODB-based page templates whose source may well be latin-1 encoded but, moreover, which are operating on a bunch of content that's *definitely* latin-1 encoded... -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 20% slower than Zope 2.9?!
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: What's the chameleon or z3c.pt way of dealing with this*? *'this' is stacks of ZODB-based page templates whose source may well be latin-1 encoded but, moreover, which are operating on a bunch of content that's *definitely* latin-1 encoded... Eeh, damn, haven't heard of latin-1 users in a decade. With latin-1 you probably won't be able to use Chameleon. It handles both Unicode and utf-8 encoded strings fine on its own. But that support is done deep down in the inner workings and not configurable. Your best bet now is to ignore Chameleon and put the convert to proper Unicode item up higher on the todo list. Hanno P.S. Of course it's all code, so you could subclass the right parts of the machinery and make this stuff configurable. For anyone who's not Malthe that will just be quite a bit of a pain and time consuming. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] PAS CookieAuthHelper and insufficient privileges
I'm currently implementing single sign on across Plone sites but have run into a bit of an issue with the CookieAuthHelper. Unauthorized accesses are redirected to its login_path attribute even when a user is already logged in. Plone works around this with a require_login script that traverses to insufficient_privileges (rather than login_form) when the user is not anonymous. http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/Plone/trunk/Products/CMFPlone/skins/plone_login/require_login.py I'd like to avoid having two redirects (one to require_login and then one to the remote login page). One option (as suggested in require_login.py) would be to have CookieAuthHelper traverse rather than redirect to the login_path so that sites could override the behaviour, though they would then presumably need to duplicate the functionality currently in CookieAuthHelper.unauthorized (which I must admit to only barely understanding...) http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/browser/Products.PluggableAuthService/trunk/Products/PluggableAuthService/plugins/CookieAuthHelper.py Instead, it would seem to make sense to move this functionality login / insufficient privileges functionality into the CookieAuthHelp itself. I could add an insufficient_privs_path and redirect there instead of login_path when a user is already authorized. Yet another option would be to let logged in unauthorized to percolate up and implement that page with an error view. Any opinions? I'm leaning towards adding an insufficient_privs_path as it seems simplest and least invasive. (When not set it would just use login_path as normal). Laurence ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
