[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 78 OK, 15 Failed, 1 Unknown
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Feb 5 12:00:00 2011 UTC to Sun Feb 6 12:00:00 2011 UTC. There were 94 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 21 from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 5 from ct at gocept.com, 45 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com. Test failures - Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 15:06:37 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031059.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13_win-py2.7 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 15:08:11 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031061.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0_win-py2.4 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 15:31:20 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031065.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / ztk_10 py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sat Feb 5 16:02:54 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031071.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 16:12:25 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031074.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 16:27:32 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031077.html Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sat Feb 5 19:47:34 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031109.html Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 2 From: ct at gocept.com Date: Sat Feb 5 20:30:21 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031113.html Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs for zopetoolkit: 196 From: ct at gocept.com Date: Sat Feb 5 20:37:33 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031115.html Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs for zope: 50 From: ct at gocept.com Date: Sat Feb 5 20:40:37 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031116.html Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs for zope2: 1 From: ct at gocept.com Date: Sat Feb 5 20:45:07 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031117.html Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 317 projects From: ct at gocept.com Date: Sat Feb 5 21:12:36 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031120.html Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Sat Feb 5 21:39:55 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031121.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.rml_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sat Feb 5 22:53:28 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031130.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.coverage_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Sat Feb 5 23:40:29 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031132.html Unknown --- Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 15:31:19 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031064.html Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 14:19:18 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031049.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 14:20:45 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031050.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 14:22:08 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031051.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 14:33:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031052.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 14:35:25 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031053.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.4 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 14:41:06 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/031054.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.5 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sat Feb 5 14:47:11 EST 2011 URL:
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 51 OK, 5 Failed
Hi. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Gediminas Paulauskas mene...@pov.lt wrote: But then I see that some other modules (most notably, zope.traversing 3.13.1) that have trunk in ztk 1.0 require zope.security[zcml]=3.8 but we only have 3.7.4. It looks like a harmless change, can zope.security be upgraded in the stable branch? The ZTK release team discussed the issue of upgrading versions in one of their last meetings. I haven't had time to write down a polished policy document about this. So here's the short version: - In general we only want bugfixes in bugfix ZTK releases (for example ZTK 1.0.1 to 1.0.2). - If a package has had feature update (like zope.security 3.7 to 3.8) anyone can suggest to update to the new version. - Such suggestion should be posted to zope-dev before checking in the actual version update into Subversion. - The suggestion should come with a short rationale as to why this upgrade is considered safe and a link to the changelog (like http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.security#changes). - You can make the change in Subversion right after posting the suggestion, but the release team reserves itself the right to revert it - if we don't agree with the rationale. I hope this is clear enough and has little enough stop energy in it, while allowing the release team to guarantee the stability of the ZTK releases. In case of zope.security 3.8.0 I don't see any problem upgrading to it for ZTK 1.0.x. Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
