Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 1

2013-02-27 Thread Patrick Gerken
Hi,

Both the daily zope app tests and the zope app tests that run with each
commits have been deactivated.

And Marius, thanks for dedication to look into the errors each day!

Best regards,

   Patrick


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:

 On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
   [3]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 167
 
  Build #168:
 
/tmp/hudson2996479762744665535.sh: 1: ./bin/test-zopeapp: not found

 Given http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/129871/zopetoolkit (aka remove
 all traces of zopeapp including test-zopeapp) this job should be disabled.

   [5]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
   [12]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
   [13]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
   [18]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
   [19]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
 
  Moved to github.

 These are already corrected in SVN.

 Marius Gedminas
 --
 http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development

 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists -
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 1

2013-02-27 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:52:56AM +0100, Patrick Gerken wrote:
 Both the daily zope app tests and the zope app tests that run with each
 commits have been deactivated.
 
 And Marius, thanks for dedication to look into the errors each day!

I tricked myself into looking at this task as a way to play with my new toy
https://gist.github.com/mgedmin/4995950

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-27 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi everyone,

 We are about 5-6 packages away from porting ZTK to Python 3

That's awesome!

//Lennart
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-27 Thread Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
Hi,

On 2/26/13 5:04 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 Hi.
 
 The process for a ZTK 2.0 release isn't really well defined. I'm not
 sure if Jan-Wijbrand and Christophe are still interested in working on
 ZTK releases.

I'm personally and from a business-perspective still interested in the
ZTK and to have Grok to be a relevant (to the ZTK process) consumer of
the ZTK.

That said, I've been off of the radar for a while concerning the ZTK
because: 1) busy and 2) Grok's proven to be fairly stable and thus did
not need much maintenance for quite a while.

So:

* Thanks Stephan and Hanno to get this ball rolling again

* Thanks to whoever ported so many of the ZTK packages to Python 3 already!

* I'll need to blow of some dust from my ZTK-knowledge and how Grok is
using it to give you useful input to your questions.

regards, jw

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-27 Thread Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
Hi,

On 2/26/13 7:26 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
snip
 Our rule for inclusion in the ZTK is: Whatever library is used by at
 least two out of the three frameworks (BlueBream, Grok, Zope).
 
 Given that BlueBream hasn't seen any release beyond a 1.0 about two
 years back, I'm not sure it's active or relevant anymore. Grok isn't
 seeing frequent releases, but there was a 1.5.5 mid last year.
 
 If you compare the version list from the last ZTK 1.1.5
 (http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/1.1.5/zopeapp-versions.cfg)
 and Grok 1.5.5 (http://grok.zope.org/releaseinfo/1.5.5/versions.cfg),
 you'll notice that Grok already overwrites the version requirement for
 half of the non-deprecated packages with its own versions. And as I
 said, Zope isn't using any of them anymore for a long time.
 
 So I don't see any value in testing and promising stability for those
 zope.app packages, when there aren't any shared consumers for the
 specific versions.
 
 And the actually used versions by Grok are:
 zope.app.applicationcontrol, zope.app.appsetup, zope.app.debug -
 renaming those to a non zope.app prefix doesn't make a lot of sense
 for me either - as they are all about a specific app server
 configuration and not generally reusable libraries.

Agreed, from a Grok perspective: if there is no shared interested
anymore in the zope.app.* packages, Grok will need to take up
maintainership for those itself. In a way we already did by upping the
versions of several of those package already.

The zope.app.* packages that really are in use for a vanilla Grok-based
application are zope.app.applicationcontrol, zope.app.appsetup and
zope.app.debug and zope.app.wsgi.

If there would be a strong drive from the Grok community to have Python
3 compatibility, they (and that includes me :) ) should port those
zope.app.* packages or build the equivalents.

I'll make note of this on the Grok dev list as well.

regards, jw





___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-27 Thread Sebastien Douche
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is anyone here willing to start a buildbot using Python 3.3 to test the ZTK?

I created a buildbot (the 1.1 branch) two months ago[1]:
http://buildbot.afpy.org/ztk1.1dev/builders/Python3.3.0%20Linux%2064bit

Ready to launch a new one with ZTK 1.2 / 2.0 / whatever. In the same
time, i test regularly the Zope3 packages in my own way[2] (testing
with mr.developer is cool but I want to test official packages on
the PyPI) . A bit hard 'cause:

1. Some essential packages are broken (ZODB, zope.app.wsgi,
zope.index). It's a pain to simulate the missing packages.

2. z3c.recipe.compattest and zc.recipe.testrunner doesn't work with Buildout 2.

 - Add support for Python 3.x (either 3.3 or 3.2 and 3.3)

 Since I was unwilling to change all u'...' to u('...'), most packages
 currently only have Python 3.3 support. By the time ZTK 2.0 will be released,
 I think most people will have switched to Python 3.3.

+1

 - Drop all zope.app packages from the KGS (most were deprecated in ZTK 1.1)

 Some of the zope.app packages (the ones not deprecated) should stay or simply
 be renamed to not being called zope.app.*.

All? In my mind, some zope.app are essentials like zope.app.wsgi,
zope.app.appsetup or zope.app.testing.

 We will also need to add a few packages, such as BTrees, persistent,
 transaction, etc. and deprecate/remove some others like zope.broken,
 zope.untrustedpython, zope.fixers, and zope.apidoc.

Can you tell me what is missing or deprecated in this list ?
https://github.com/sdouche/zopetoolkit-py3.3/blob/master/ztk.cfg




[1] https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2012-December/044964.html
[2] https://github.com/sdouche/zopetoolkit-py3.3

--
Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com
Twitter: @sdouche / G+: +sdouche
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-27 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:04:46AM -0500, Sebastien Douche wrote:
 2. z3c.recipe.compattest and zc.recipe.testrunner doesn't work with Buildout 
 2.

The latter has been fixed in zc.recipe.testrunner 2.0.0.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote:
 2. z3c.recipe.compattest and zc.recipe.testrunner doesn't work with Buildout 
 2.

Both do now. You currently need z3c.recipe.compattest from trunk though.

I updated the ZTK trunk in the last days, and most of it should work
under Python 3.3 now.

To test do:

svn co svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zopetoolkit/trunk ztk-trunk
cd ztk-trunk
python3.3 bootstrap.py
bin/buildout
bin/test-ztk

Locally I get test failures for 10 packages - since not all are ported
yet. But the overall buildout and test infrastructure works. Note that
this is pulling in ZODB, ZEO and the compattest recipe from Git/SVN
via mr.developers auto-checkout option. For everything else it uses
(alpha) releases. If you want to test the master of every package, you
have to run bin/buildout -c development.cfg.

 Can you tell me what is missing or deprecated in this list ?
 https://github.com/sdouche/zopetoolkit-py3.3/blob/master/ztk.cfg

Best check back against the canonical file in SVN as mentioned above.

Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 22, OK: 12, UNKNOWN: 2

2013-02-27 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2013-02-26 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-27 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received


[1]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 186
[2]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 168
[3]UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux
[4]UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
   Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.7.3 : Linux
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[5]winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
[6]winbot / z3c.breadcrumb_py_265_32
[7]winbot / z3c.configurator_py_265_32
[8]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
[9]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
[10]   winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
[11]   winbot / z3c.pagelet_py_265_32
[12]   winbot / z3c.sampledata_py_265_32
[13]   winbot / zc.resourcelibrary_py_265_32
[14]   winbot / zope.app.pagetemplate_py_265_32
[15]   winbot / zope.app.server_py_265_32
[16]   winbot / zope.app.server_py_265_32
[17]   winbot / zope.app.wsgi_py_265_32
[18]   winbot / zope.browserpage_py_265_32
[19]   winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32
[20]   winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
[21]   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
[22]   winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
[23]   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
[24]   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--

[1]FAILED  Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 186
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072879.html


[2]FAILED  Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 168
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072878.html


[3]UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072885.html


[4]UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072886.html


[5]FAILED  winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072901.html


[6]FAILED  winbot / z3c.breadcrumb_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072899.html


[7]FAILED  winbot / z3c.configurator_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072905.html


[8]FAILED  winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072902.html


[9]FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072908.html


[10]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072877.html


[11]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.pagelet_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072904.html


[12]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.sampledata_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072907.html


[13]   FAILED  winbot / zc.resourcelibrary_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072906.html


[14]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.pagetemplate_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072875.html


[15]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.server_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072909.html


[16]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.server_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072874.html


[17]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.wsgi_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072900.html


[18]   FAILED  winbot / zope.browserpage_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072903.html


[19]   FAILED  winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072876.html


[20]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072887.html


[21]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072889.html


[22]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072890.html


[23]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072892.html


[24]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072894.html