On Wednesday 26 May 2004 08:42 am, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > That works for me too, but please *above* the diff.
Yes; I should have been more clear and said *immediately* following the commit message. > No, the CVS should stay in there to tell them apart, for the very same > reason you stated (patches in both CVS and svn). Without the 'SVN:', it > will still be unique. I would even argue that it would make it visually > easier. Right now, my email client lists a lot of: Ok; like I said, I don't feel very strongly about this. > Sure. I'm not saying that we should convert everything *right* now, but > moving relatively independent stuff makes sense, IMO. I'm not suggesting > to move CMF or something else with a gazillion branches... Cool. zpkg is a good candidate, since it's not shared with other projects, it's a stand-alone tool. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fred at zope.com> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
