Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] 64-bit BTrees

2006-04-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Chris Withers wrote:
 The implicit change to make them all 64-bits which results in some 
 unknown slowdown for all I BTree users seems a bit too scary to bite 
 off...

Has anyone done any benchmarks to prove that 64-bits is slower or
faster? It would be interesting to see benchmarks on modern 32bit
and a 64bit systems. Until then it's all hand-waiving.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/   It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] 64-bit BTrees

2006-04-19 Thread Shane Hathaway

Wichert Akkerman wrote:

Previously Chris Withers wrote:

The implicit change to make them all 64-bits which results in some 
unknown slowdown for all I BTree users seems a bit too scary to bite 
off...



Has anyone done any benchmarks to prove that 64-bits is slower or
faster? It would be interesting to see benchmarks on modern 32bit
and a 64bit systems. Until then it's all hand-waiving.


One data point: on my AMD 64 box, when I run 32 bit Linux, I get about 
30,000 pystones, while 64 bit Linux yields 50,000 pystones.  This 
doesn't mean 64 bit code is necessarily faster, but it does suggest that 
64 bit CPUs prefer 64 bit code.


Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )