[Zope-PAS] Re: Test layers for pastc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ross Patterson wrote: > Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Ross Patterson wrote: >> >>> I'd love to convert PAS's tests to layers for test setUp and tearDown. >>> Any objections? >> Layers are all about sharing setup across a set of tests, which means >> they risk breaking test isolation. I normally don't use layers for >> anything which is a pure "unit test," but can see the point for >> "function" or "integration" tests. >> >> Are there a specific set of tests you have in mind which have >> significant setup / teardown costs? > > Well I also find that layers make factoring and re-using setup much > easier, so that was my motivation. If that's an abuse of the intentions > of layers, then nevermind. :) Hmm, I guess I would need to see the specific changes you have in mind. If the "shared setup" in the layer creates state which coould potentially be "scribbled on" by one or more tests, then I "agin'it", at least for unit testing. I'd rather rewrite tests to *remove* code from setup (creating fixtures by calling helper methods / functions in the test case), than try to make shared fixtures more efficient to create. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQggW+gerLs4ltQ4RAmq2AJ9kC9t1eBTmfXqzbIWtClDIRiekLQCeOgDM kvxXDq08ULB5GargRRQceB4= =0KTf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-PAS mailing list Zope-PAS@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-pas
[Zope-PAS] Re: Test layers for pastc
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ross Patterson wrote: > >> I'd love to convert PAS's tests to layers for test setUp and tearDown. >> Any objections? > > Layers are all about sharing setup across a set of tests, which means > they risk breaking test isolation. I normally don't use layers for > anything which is a pure "unit test," but can see the point for > "function" or "integration" tests. > > Are there a specific set of tests you have in mind which have > significant setup / teardown costs? Well I also find that layers make factoring and re-using setup much easier, so that was my motivation. If that's an abuse of the intentions of layers, then nevermind. :) Ross ___ Zope-PAS mailing list Zope-PAS@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-pas
[Zope-PAS] Re: Test layers for pastc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ross Patterson wrote: > I'd love to convert PAS's tests to layers for test setUp and tearDown. > Any objections? Layers are all about sharing setup across a set of tests, which means they risk breaking test isolation. I normally don't use layers for anything which is a pure "unit test," but can see the point for "function" or "integration" tests. Are there a specific set of tests you have in mind which have significant setup / teardown costs? Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQfr/+gerLs4ltQ4RAlOiAJ9b0oLr3bQ6kzQ7uIEZrVCCCYw65wCdG9/4 lt+xV0R1dR0axvqorh6ls64= =AFQu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-PAS mailing list Zope-PAS@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-pas
